A striker who doesn't score goals, a keeper who costs us points, and a midfielder who is never fit. Our marquee Summer signings have NOT improved us.

Status
Not open for further replies.

The Oracle

Full Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
1,115
From the club's official website:

"Our first signing of the transfer window was confirmed on 5 July, when England international Mason Mount officially put pen-to-paper after sealing his move from Chelsea.

Goalkeeper Andre Onana joined from Internazionale on 20 July, after being the club's top choice to replace David De Gea.

Denmark striker Rasmus Hojlund was presented to the crowd at Old Trafford on 5 August, minutes before the Reds played Lens in the team's penultimate pre-season friendly."


They haven't improved us! We are worse than we were last season.
Bad recruitment or bad luck?
 

Big Ben Foster

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
12,845
Location
BR -> MI -> TX
Supports
Also support Vasco da Gama
Bad recruitment. Indulging the manager and letting him take the lead on transfers is a suicidal strategy these days.
 

Dec9003

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
9,034
Bad recruitment. Not necessarily bad players but not what we needed at this time.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
But at least we signed them early and for pre-season right? Because apparently if you don't sign the managers targets in time for pre-season you're screwing them over.
 

The Purley King

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
4,274
Onana = single handedly cost us CL qualification

Mount = never fit plus seemingly not trusted by ETH

Hoijlund = decent player in there but is like a great white trying to feed off plankton.

Don’t know where to start but that is a fecking shit effort at getting out of the group stage.
 

IRELANDUNITED

Full Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2014
Messages
2,327
Just in case you don’t know - you don’t need to create a thread for every single thought that pops into your head.
 

The Irish Connection

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,347
Absolutely shocking recruitment. Mount for 55m in the last year of his contract after a poor season was just baffling.

Onana had a history of making howlers but definitely more composed on the ball than De Gea. Doesn’t do the basics though.

And Hojlund is raw, had 9 goals for the season in Serie A.

The Glazers have fecked us financially but the recruitment is genuinely awful.

I hope under Ratcliffe we just write off the bad signings, take a hit but move them on and get proper quality in.
No more number 10s for central midfield.
Could still be hamstrung by FFP though.
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,087
Horrifying decision-making in rebuilding the squad. No one, it seems, was the adult in the room to say no when ten Hag demanded we sign Antony, Mount, Onana and Hojlund.
 

TempusFugit

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 16, 2020
Messages
247
I don't even know how good Højlund is at shooting or even just finishing. He barely gets ONE chance a game where we play the ball into his feet and let him do his job. Zero service for the kid, it's a disgrace. How many times have we had him taking shots in the box? It's always the scrappy chances, balls flashed across the box or him basically making something out of nothing. We don't create clear cut chances as a team, bring in even Kane and he'll look average here.
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,246
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
Denmark striker Rasmus Hojlund was presented to the crowd at Old Trafford on 5 August, minutes before the Reds played Lens in the team's penultimate pre-season friendly."
He’s a 20 year old kid, cut him some slack. He’s had injuries and our team is that disjointed that his service as a striker is basically no existent. Yes he need to impose himself into games more, but if our creative core aren’t finding him with passes then he’s already on a hiding to nothing.
 

Trequarista10

Full Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2020
Messages
2,544
Onana has been the worst. I hadn't seen much of him so had no strong opinion, but the consensus on here seemed to be that he would be transformative.

Mount signing was always strange as we have plenty of mids who excel further up the pitch but we're lacking deeper options. Has spent more time injured than fit, but I'm not confident he will make an impact ir provide what we need even when fit

Hojlund, meh. There's some talent there but ultimately needs to score more. In an ideal world he'd have been eased in as second choice because he's clearly raw. Feel for him. If his lack of goals continues it won't be long until he gets Weghorst like mockery, which could be crushing for the kid.

Amrabat, meh. A bit shite, but no more shite than most of our squad. A reminder for me that a couple televised games and highlight videos can be deceiving, as I was convinced by him.

The best signing, amusingly, has probably been Jonny Evans.

-

Question is, are they better or worse than last season's signings? Martinez, Malacia, Casemiro, Eriksen, Antony? Maybe last years is a touch better (Martinez is class, Casemiro had a good few months and Eriksen a bright spell), but it's close enough I may have a different opinion by the end of the season.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,359
You can criticize Onana and Mount all you want, but please stop being negative towards Hojlund.

He is a 20 years old for feck's sake, playing with wingers who do not pass and playing in a new league. Even with all of that he makes us stronger in every game with his pressing.

Hojlund will be great for us, if we take care of him. It's not ok to mix him up with Onana and Mount just because you are trying to make a point about Ten Hag.

The mistake was putting the pressure of bing United's main striker on Hojlund. Signing Hojlund was not a mistake. We should have also signed a senior striker.
 

Denis79

Full Member
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
7,777
He’s a 20 year old kid, cut him some slack. He’s had injuries and our team is that disjointed that his service as a striker is basically no existent. Yes he need to impose himself into games more, but if our creative core aren’t finding him with passes then he’s already on a hiding to nothing.
I like him but he won't become a top striker, he would have shown some magic by now. I feel sorry for him being put under pressure so young but thats on Ten Hag.
 

paulscholes18

Full Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
20,215
Maybe Weghorst wasn’t as bad as we made him look. We don’t create chances for our strikers.
 

Thom Merrilin

Full Member
Joined
Jan 15, 2022
Messages
785
I'd argue they all improve the squad. I'll take Hojlund over Martial any day. Onana I believe will come good and people forget how poor De Gea was. Mount is better than the player he replaced in the squad which is Fred. Although, I'll admit I rate Mount more than most.

Whether they improve the team enough for the money spent is a different question.
 

SRB87

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 24, 2014
Messages
46
Location
Red Star Belgrade
Supports
ACU
If ETH and management were just a little smarter, everything could have looked differently by now. 400fkn million spent and we got worse. With just a little bit of common sense, i think we could have done so much better.

I am certain that even if we went with a cheap alternatives in some positions, turning them into squad players, we would have been better off. For instance, Mitrovic would have cost much less than Hojlund and is proven in the prem. I know its the Saudi league but hes still got 22 goals in 23 games. As for wingers, there were and are so many good options within the league. For what Antony cost, we could have gotten Diaby and someone like Cunha who i rank highly. The 50mil on Onana we dont even have to talk about and almost deserves a sacking - GK was in no way a priority here.

Guys that were legitimately available and we had demand for:
Diaby,
Mitrovic
James madison for 46M
Doku (we didnt scout)
Brennan Johnson
Pau Torres
Joao Pedro (for half the price, maybe a better and less risky talent to pursue)
Szobozlai
Van de Ven
pedro porro
Cunha
Kudus for 40m
etc. etc. etc.
This list keeps on going and i do understand hindsight is 20/20 but ETH has to take the blame. A huge reason why we are bad is because we essentially had no transfers considering theyre mostly all flops and not even playing. Crazy to think so many still want him here considering the damage.
 
Last edited:

Todd

Full Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
3,446
Location
Indiana, USA
On paper, signing Onana was a smart move. He fit the profile of what we needed at the position, was coming off of a great season, and was available for a not-outrageous fee. I can't fault us for making that signing, and I don't think anyone would've expected he'd turn out to be so unreliable.

The Højlund signing was bad business, we overpaid terribly for a kid.

The Mount signing might go down as one of the stupidest bits of business we've done ever.
 

The_Midfielder

Full Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
3,628
On paper, signing Onana was a smart move. He fit the profile of what we needed at the position, was coming off of a great season, and was available for a not-outrageous fee. I can't fault us for making that signing, and I don't think anyone would've expected he'd turn out to be so unreliable.

The Højlund signing was bad business, we overpaid terribly for a kid.

The Mount signing might go down as one of the stupidest bits of business we've done ever.
If you really think Onana was a better signing .. think again..
He was good but if yiu had looked at. His technique , you would have noticed he was not that good ..
Any top goalkeeper coach/ recruiter would have identified that ..
 

InfiniteBoredom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
13,670
Location
Melbourne
I think of the 3 only Onana can be unfailingly placed at EtH’s feet. We needed to sign homegrown and were planning to flog McTominay and Maguire, and were selling Fred, so Mount fits the profile even though I and many others had reselevation about our shape with him in the team. Hojlund we overpaid but you can’t convince me that EtH passed over the chance of signing someone like Kane or Osimhen over him, there were rumours of getting Taremi to share the load and that fell through as well.

The well known ‘3 signings a summer’ fecked us again, we spent badly but in the best of case we still needed more.
 

mu4c_20le

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
43,931
He’s a 20 year old kid, cut him some slack. He’s had injuries and our team is that disjointed that his service as a striker is basically no existent. Yes he need to impose himself into games more, but if our creative core aren’t finding him with passes then he’s already on a hiding to nothing.
Martial was 20 when he came here and scored 11 goals in the league in a defensive system.
 

frostbite

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
3,296
If you really think Onana was a better signing .. think again..
He was good but if yiu had looked at. His technique , you would have noticed he was not that good ..
Any top goalkeeper coach/ recruiter would have identified that ..
Ten Hag was Onana's manager at Ajax, he worked with him every day, he wanted him again, and that's why he ditched De Gea. If his own manager doesn't know whether he is good or bad, then obviously the main problem is that you have the wrong manager!
 

Plant0x84

Shame we’re aren’t more like Brighton
Joined
Jun 23, 2020
Messages
13,246
Location
Carpark and snack area adjacent to the abyss
I like him but he won't become a top striker, he would have shown some magic by now. I feel sorry for him being put under pressure so young but thats on Ten Hag.
He’s joint top scorer in this season CL, level with Haaland, and better than Kane, Mbappe, Bellingham and Griezmann. He’s got time, he’ll be just fine!
 

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,478
Our two best signings by far from the the £400m were free transfers (Eriksen and Evans).
 

RoadTrip

petitioned for a just cause
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
26,404
Location
Los Pollos Hermanos...
Bad recruitment. Indulging the manager and letting him take the lead on transfers is a suicidal strategy these days.
It’s a failure of the club if ETH is deciding who to sign unilaterally. ETH signs who he feels he should sign if the club give him that power. It’s not how any big club is run and is destined for failure. The problem here is bigger than just ETH signing shit players.
 

Baneofthegame

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2019
Messages
3,018
Not sure what Hojlund is meant to do when he’s not getting any service.

Onana has been okay in the league, terrible in the CL.

Mount can’t get fit and when he’s fit he doesn’t seem to play because as I said in another thread we seem to see DVB was a waste of 40 million because Bruno has unreal fitness and thought, you know what? Let’s spend 60 million on the next one.
 

TrustInJanuzaj

'Liverpool are a proper club'
Joined
Mar 26, 2015
Messages
10,728
Mount is the only poor signing. Just not what we needed at all. But people are downplaying our injuries, we haven’t been able to play a consistent team all season.
 

Spaghetti

Mom's
Joined
Aug 15, 2012
Messages
1,463
Location
Barcelona
Onana = single handedly cost us CL qualification

Mount = never fit plus seemingly not trusted by ETH

Hoijlund = decent player in there but is like a great white trying to feed off plankton.

Don’t know where to start but that is a fecking shit effort at getting out of the group stage.
Not really. He’s missed loads of good chances.
 

JohnnyKills

Full Member
Joined
Jan 8, 2016
Messages
7,099
The problem isn't this year's signings. It's last year's.

We paid Real Madrid 60 million for Casemiro's injuries, and we signed a one-footed winger with no pace for 80 million. Two shocking bits of business even by our standards.

Too early to call any of this summer's signings IMO.
 

Dr. StrangeHate

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2013
Messages
5,507
Striker wise, Hojlund was the best we could have gotten.
99% of the CAF could have told you that Mount would be a failure even considering 99.99% of us are idiots.
Onana is a mystery to me. He single handedly took us out of the CL and he is also responsible for that non-penalty decision in the beginning of the season which has cost us so many points already. How did we get that one so wrong?
 

Ace of Spades

Full Member
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
5,232
The manager wanted these players, and is not even using them to their strengths. Terrible management.
 

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,536
Striker wise, Hojlund was the best we could have gotten.
99% of the CAF could have told you that Mount would be a failure even considering 99.99% of us are idiots.
Onana is a mystery to me. He single handedly took us out of the CL and he is also responsible for that non-penalty decision in the beginning of the season which has cost us so many points already. How did we get that one so wrong?
I refuse to believe there isnt a better striker out there for £72million. Not having a go at Hojlund btw, I just dont think he's ready yet.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,714
Being a United keeper had always been tricky. SAF was a genius but he was only able to find 3 decent keepers one of which was already way past his 30s when signed and the latter wasn't WC anymore as soon as he hit 30. Schmeichel used to call the role as the loneliest role in the world which might explain why he fecked off after the treble. On top of that the defensive department at United is shocking. Martinez is out, Shaw and Varane are injury prone and the rest are quite frankly not good enough. Not to forget that we don't have a DM and our 2 other midfielders (McT and Bruno) think that they are strikers. Hojlund was a mistake. The talent is there but at that price and giving our circumstances we should have gone for a more experienced forward.

The reality is that our team is a mess. You can count the amount of ball playing defenders we've got on one hand, our wingers don't pass the ball and we don't have a DM
 

acnumber9

Full Member
Joined
Jun 21, 2006
Messages
22,292
On paper, signing Onana was a smart move. He fit the profile of what we needed at the position, was coming off of a great season, and was available for a not-outrageous fee. I can't fault us for making that signing, and I don't think anyone would've expected he'd turn out to be so unreliable.
He’s the third most expensive goalkeeper of all time and if the manager who had worked with him before didn’t know then what hope have we got?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.