She's not even that hot.Newcastle is now my second favorite team.
Yeah I don't see it, but maybe it's the fact she's the same age as my mum that puts me off.She's not even that hot.
Don't bother, your good intentions will fall on deaf ears here.You guys realise that the internet is full of good smut right, and therefore it is no longer necessary for you primates to sexualise any woman you find attractive in every conversation?
she has also fronted deals for the quatari investment authority so who knows - perhaps links to PSG would be more likley as they are not direct competitorsStaveley has close links with Sheik Mansour having worked with him during his takeover in City in 2008. It'll be interesting to see if there is increased cooperation between the clubs should the deal go through.
If it takes a football thread off-topic - yes.Is it always necessary to take offense if someone appreciates a woman's attractive quotient?
Yes don't get me wrong this isn't a moan against big bad City (perish the very thought ), merely a recognition of potential connections between the boardrooms.she has also fronted deals for the quatari investment authority so who knows - perhaps links to PSG would be more likley as they are not direct competitors
indeed she has connections in the region - i just think it may be easier to push those minks with the quataris (especially as they have a world cup to market)Yes don't get me wrong this isn't a moan against big bad City (perish the very thought ), merely a recognition of potential connections between the boardrooms.
Fair enough. It was a slightly jokey comment based upon preferring to look at an attractive club owner than, for example Mike Ashley, followed by a daft gag about the fit and proper person test, but as it seems to have caused offence, please just delete the thread. I'm not looking to cause an issue.If it takes a football thread off-topic - yes.
My biggest worry is the source of her and her associates wealth. The Middle East is extremely corrupt. People who make money there aren't exactly doing it by selling Adidas. It is suspicious that so much foreign money is being invested in European football.For all Mike Ashley's faults, which there are many, he isn't an asset stripper. Newcastle fans be careful what you wish for.
Thank feckFor all Mike Ashley's faults, which there are many, he isn't a stripper. Newcastle fans be careful what you wish for.
I disagree. Women with money and in positions of power have an automatic degree of hotness to them..She's not even that hot.
So i'm guessing you find Theresa May and Angela Merkel hot?I disagree. Women with money and in positions of power have an automatic degree of hotness to them..
You bet.So i'm guessing you find Theresa May and Angela Merkel hot?
If the only thing you can do when a woman is brought up in a conversation, is sexually objectify her, then I wouldn't count that as harmless but more predatory.So on a football forum with 95% men, apparently you can't comment on a woman's looks in a harmless, joking manner.
That's why I said a degree of hotness..So i'm guessing you find Theresa May and Angela Merkel hot?
You guys realise that the internet is full of good smut right, and therefore it is no longer necessary for you primates to sexualise any woman you find attractive in every conversation?
"Primates."Don't bother, your good intentions will fall on deaf ears here.
I'm a girl, and surely there's nothing wrong with pointing out objectification?"Primates."
"Good intentions."
Christ above. I'm sure she's a very accomplished business woman. Anyway, I'd ride the hole off her.
Hope that doesn't make you two lads faint.
you're completely overblowing it.If the only thing you can do when a woman is brought up in a conversation, is sexually objectify her, then I wouldn't count that as harmless but more predatory.
Regardless of the percentage of men in one space there is.
Besides, it looks like the posts have been deleted, probably by a mod due to their crassness.
Those two old bats are a bit much even for a gold-digger.You bet.
A female dominated forum, and a middle-aged man is on the verge of completing a very complicated business move that could potentially benefit both parties.you're completely overblowing it.
i'm sure if this was a female dominated forum and a really good looking guy was in the op that there wouldn't be comments about his looks.
Not many, probably a few. Just like here.A female dominated forum, and a middle-aged man is on the verge of completing a very complicated business move that could potentially benefit both parties.
I don't see many girls talking about how they would ride his penis off.
If it was an article about Chris Evans' workout regime and there were multiple supporting photos of him topless & sweaty, then yes of course there he will be subjected to being a sex object. I'm part of a few mostly-female forums, and the casual objectification is pretty non-existent frankly - also it isn't limited to just men.
We're on a football forum, discussing a business move that's going to affect one of the biggest clubs in the country (and is long overdue) and the only thing you can say is how the prospective owner looks?
That's not even remaining on topic with the thread, which is one of the forum rules on here.
It's a crazy world, we get plenty of that talk from men in Guardiola threads.A female dominated forum, and a middle-aged man is on the verge of completing a very complicated business move that could potentially benefit both parties.
I don't see many girls talking about how they would ride his penis off.
It's a crazy world, we get plenty of that talk from men in Guardiola threads.
No offence, just calling a spade a spade.Not many, probably a few. Just like here.
But yes, it's off topic, personally I thought the op was a funny, harmless joke, and only really went off topic when people started taking offense to it (typically). but then, it's the internet, people are easily offended.
It's a crazy world, we get plenty of that talk from men in Guardiola threads.
See now you're making stuff up.No offence, just calling a spade a spade.
If you see nothing wrong in judging a woman based on her looks, surely others should be able to judge the posts based on their crudeness?