Ok maybe I got the wrong end of the stick.
Yes, that's what he claimed but as I said how does it add up that before the movie they had good chemistry in tests. After the movie, they tested with sample audiences and they had good chemistry. And there was no "bad chemistry" documented only good.
Chemistry would be if steak and ice cream go well together. That's the whole point which was tested before after and during the movie.
Sure but the statement in court wasn't that "You and Jason tested well together" it was that "You tested well" as far as I could tell the word "chemistry" wasn't used when she was receiving praise from the director.
You'd have to show me that because from my memory I clearly remember that they were part of a chemistry test before production and tested well, then their scenes were shown to a sampled audience and tested well.
I mean, we see movies with bad chemistry all the time. Chemistry tests can only do so much.
I'm only gonna comment on the chemistry part because I missed the rest of the testimony. If it's just him "saying" it that can be countered with Heards witnesses "saying" she was cut. Who do you believe then? But again, I haven't seen it and if he had substantial proof (more so than Heard's witnesses) then it's a different case.
F W I W Amber Heard was the only reason watching Aquaman on an Imax was worth it, but it had nothing to do with her acting.
He testified to JD's damages during JD's case too.
Don't think anyone ever really "looked" closely at her acting. I only realised she sucked now that I watched her in this trial
Imagine letting an eye witness testify. The nerve. How dare he be pro-Depp. I say Depp should only be allowed pro-Amber witnesses.
Yeah I don't understand why that's a problem.*
He also just lied on oath. He said he has not followed this trial but follows an account called justice for depp or something that tweets several times a day about the case?
So all of Amber Heard's witnesses were biased but in this case it's how dare he speak?
I wasn't watching it, you just said that he followed a pro-Depp Twitter account and I said I didnt understand why that was an issue.
Nah. Deffo problem. Amber can have her sister testify though because she's not bias. Just top-tier Shaman logic.
Cool does that mean all his testimony will be thrown out?
Again I'm gonna ignore that to like 80% of my posts you're responded with laughing emojis or some form of name calling, but I'll bite even though I will probably regret it.
If the jury has issue with Heard's witnesses being her friends then they'll most certainly have an issue with this guy.
Guess they managed to keep it out as hearsay. Odd because it should be allowed to impeach Whitney.
DMCA takedown of evidenceNothing says innocent like an emergency cover-up
Nah its not the video, it's a witness who is going to testify about who leaked to TMZ
Yup. It 100% was sold to them by her as you said but she testified under oath that it was not. Will be nice if we can get a witness in to prove otherwise & just expose yet another incident of perjury from this cretin.
As far as I'm aware, Depp's team has a witness to prove exactly that, but TMZ are asking the court not to reveal who gave them the video because in the future people might be reluctant to give them 'scoops' if there is a chance that they can be implicated in that.
We all watch rawk once in a while doesn't make us liverpool fans.
