Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp | Depp wins on all 3 counts
- Thread starter Reapersoul20
- Start date
Beat me to it.
sorry mate.It is an issue, Heard said it to add validity to what she was saying by claiming Depp had done it to someone else, doesn't matter if she thought it was a rumor as she tried to present it as a fact. Then it was proven that what she thought happened to Moss didn't actually happen, it doesn't help her if she can't substantiate these things before saying them under oath. She was under oath trying to pass a rumor as a fact which correct me if i'm wrong is hearsay, on top of that it looks like she's committed perjury as well in this trial.
You can't even accept the most obvious audio evidence out there of Depp headbutting Heard. For him, it must have been self defense or a mere clash.
What she said under oath was "All I could think of was Kate Moss and stairs". That is not perjury in any sense.
I wasn't referencing Moss as the perjury.
It's interesting to me to see the stark contrast in the views of all the women I know in real life who have been following this case closely, who see it as very significant for "Deppo" to open up about his abuse, in a world where men being abused by women is still a difficult topic, and think that Heard trying to portray herself as a victim has been abhorrent, and then on here there are dudes saying that anyone who thinks she takes the lion's share of responsibility here is being misogynistic.
Neither will be accused of perjury. Depp denied saying something completely and then texts revealed he had. These sort of "lies" rarely fall under perjury.
I also don't get how calling out AH for laughing and smiling while someone is saying she uses her sister as a punching bag is misogyny, I've seen that here too.
and I know plenty of men and women on the other side so I don't think that proves anything. Gatekeeping domestic violence has been an issue in this case
What do you mean accept the audio evidence?
If a headbutt happened because Depp was trying to restrain Heard when she was being violent, then obviously it doesn't count as violence from him. End of story.
Those are simpletons who have fallen victim to the smear campaign masterminded by Depp.
Or star struck superfans.
Or celebrity enthusiasts.
For someone who thinks its fair game to give their spouse a self defense "headbutt" I don't think the definitions of misogyny will be clear to them, so I don't blame you. Too many video games maybe
Deppaganda
That damn Deppo.
Honestly the best thing about this thread for me has been him getting a nickname that is longer than his actual name
Did anyone try "Deppy" at any point?
And where in the audio does it say this? "I headbutted you in the fecking forehead". This is in response to Heard telling him so you can punch and throw headbutts but I can't scream. So where did you get the "self defense headbutt" from?What do you mean accept the audio evidence?
If a headbutt happened because Depp was trying to restrain Heard when she was being violent, then obviously it doesn't count as violence from him. End of story.
Stuff like this is why I began to question your "Balanced" routine.
You know where the additional context that @hobbers is providing came from.
From his defense. They are obviously going to say otherwise.
When you want to intentionally headbutt someone, you normally aim for the nose, him saying that in response to her sounds like it may have been more accidental.
Surely, surely you can't be defending the Sun? I mean Heard is one thing, but that is too far.
My word, where's that Mitchell and Webb Nazi meme when I need it
Because he said "I head butted you in the forehead not the nose" and not "we clashed heads" there is no way to deduce accidental.
That's the funny thing. Jonny Depp lost to the freaking SUN of all newspapers! Think of how weak his case wasSurely, surely you can't be defending the Sun? I mean Heard is one thing, but that is too far.
My word, where's that Mitchell and Webb Nazi meme when I need it
That too in the UK where it is much easier than the US to win a defamation suit.Couldn't you do one of those calculations like this:
To deduce it?
You deduced that he physically attacked her from rumour/ speculation?
Can you deduce that it was an accidental headbutt from evidence and testimony?
From his testimony obviously.
Have you actually never seen or been in a fight before? That's the only reason I can think of why you're having such a hard time picturing how a forehead to forehead headbutt would happen in a fight. Clue: it would almost never be intentional.
You're so far past the line that you can't even see the line! The line is a dot to you!That's the funny thing. Jonny Depp lost to the freaking SUN of all newspapers! Think of how weak his case was
Massive win in the jury instruction to get a clear implication instruction.
Now, in English, please.
Seconded
Dotto?
Camille Vasquez's closing statement is pretty epic.
I was going for Joey Tribbiani.
So, Tribbo.
Rottenborn going for technecalities might work for them though.
Did he just say no way a child being emotionally abused is as bad as being physically abused as an adult?
That's scummy.
That's scummy.
This is what I don't get.
You are willing to believe nearly every word Deppo says, but not Heardios?
Did this happen before the trial, or was their an unconscious bias built up before hand.
This is the most interesting thing for me. As someone who is not on social media, doesn't really watch mainstream movies and doesn't really watch TV, I have no sway either way and the outcome of this trial really doesn't bother me at all.
Yet, for some, they appear to be frothing at the mouth at the fact that Heardio could indeed be lying, whilst in turn believing nearly every word Deppo says.
It's a damning aspect of society that fame and celebrity culture trumps morals. This trial has proved it beyond doubt for me.
She's a real cutie #sorrynotsorry
So dramatic