Very scummy
He also left out that Depp was also physically abused during his childhood
Amber Heard vs Johnny Depp | Depp wins on all 3 counts
- Thread starter Reapersoul20
- Start date
He also left out that Depp was also physically abused during his childhood
Honestly that video is very damning.
Sorry! Had to be quick while working.Seconded
There was a definitive jury instruction about the fact that the words in the op ed can be true but the underlying implications can refer to Depp and be false.
Yeah. When entwined with those audio clips of Heard it's very compelling. However, they aren't in court to prove DV by Heard so I don't know how much consideration the jury will give that.
If that's the worst evidence they have it's honestly pathetic.
He slammed cabinets and that means she gets to defame him as a domestic abuser? feck off!
What he say would make sense if Amber wasn't famous (obviously not as much as Johnny but she ain't an average Jane)So dramatic
Slamming cabinets?
The whole "oh this thread, oh the humanity!" stuff was what I found funny tbf.
This lawyer is a massive scumbag, exactly what you'd think of when you think American defence lawyer.
Despite how funny some of the bits from this were at the start, I've massively lost interest in this. Perhaps because it's gone on too long but I'm surprised the thread is being bumped so often.
The end game and ultimately statements are far more interesting than anything else to be fair.
couldn't make it up.Amber Alert in Fairfax
Amber Alert?
It's the phrase used to indicate a missing child, often one that is kidnapped and the child and kidnapper potentially driving by carAmber Alert?
Yeah. Weird timing though.
Rottenborn is putting together a decent closing.
It's built all upon the words of a known liar and perjuror but sounds good unrebutted.
It's built all upon the words of a known liar and perjuror but sounds good unrebutted.
He has.
Apart from the scumbag parts where he pisses all over child and domestic abuse of course.
he's actually used the sext in closingHe's just doing his job, at least from my point of view. But not a very good one at it. Be condescending to a jury who's been listening for six weeks, tell them they're smart boys and girls who should look only at certain things and nothing else. Tell them what exactly is relevant, what is irrelevant - it's not as if they know and have instructed about the same. Of course they'll listen to you.
JD should have had no chance at all (still think he's not winning anything), but AH and her team have tried their best to change that.
I'm talking specifically where he states in no way can child psychological abuse be as bad as adult physical abuse, and that no way can someone being abused can still love their partner.
It may be his job, but it's fecking scum still and pisses all over real domestic/child abuse situations.
Yes, if youre a cabinet
I got acting lessons from Heardio.So dramatic
Must be expecting turd showers
Amber Alert in Fairfax
Her time has finally come when she can't be objected.
Agreed with that.
The closing gets from bad to worse - this is such a car crash. Statments where he tells the jury things like 'you can't do this and you can't do that' or likewise - such gaslighting. 'That's abuse' for every single thing is clearly so bullshit. Some of them are very valid arguments that win you the case, but when you claim abuse for everything, it's boy who cried wolf.
Again, you have the case, why would you go ahead and insult the jury's intelligence. It's mindboggling.
Bredehoft is asking for sanctions after this case is over
The looks on Depp's team while she talks a load of shite
The looks on Depp's team while she talks a load of shite
Sanctions on what?
Bredehoft has just said malice is the intent to harm.
Is she an actual lawyer?
Is she an actual lawyer?
There can be sanctions after a proceeding if a lawyer or party has behaved in an unethical or negligent way.
Her behaviour has been terrible throughout
Jesus, has Bredehoft been drinking?
Why aren't they objecting? She misstated what malice is twice. Weird.
Incoherent grandma who has just been pranked by kids and is pissed off. Take 2, Elaine Bredehoft. 'Ma'am, we need you to shout even louder.'
I'll miss this drama when it's gone.
I'll miss this drama when it's gone.
It's considered poor form to object in a closing, especially when you have a rebuttal.
A lot is considered argument.
So Heard's lawyers want to sanction Depp's? Shouldn't it be the other way round.
No, her behaviour is so bad that she should be sanctioned
Harry Maguire would improve the state of this defense.
That's what i'm saying. I'm asking if it was Heard's lawyers who wanted to sanction Depp's lawyers and if it was then it should be Depp's lawyers sanctioning Heard's lawyers.
"why on earth" "it makes no sense!"
It makes no sense to show the bruises off if you are "collecting evidence for 5 years"?
How can people watch this and not even question this rambling nonsense?
It makes no sense to show the bruises off if you are "collecting evidence for 5 years"?
How can people watch this and not even question this rambling nonsense?