Wing Attack Plan R
Full Member
This "expert" witness is another bust. She's a moron. She compares Heard to motherfeckin' Zendaya, then gets dug out for it.
I've clearly reverse jinxed it since that postActually, funnily enough, he seems to be nailing this.
"Didn't know that, haven't seen that, not a fan of that, don't know about that film, don't know about that actor, don't know about that actress"How is this person an expert in Hollywood?
That was regarding Ana de Armas I believe.Amber Heard is equal to Gal Gadot. Totally. Everyone can see this. Amber was a non-speaking billboard in Bladerunner 2049, and Gal Gadot is Wonder Woman. Totally the same.
Fair enough, I'm actually working and listening to this in the background.That was regarding Ana de Armas I believe.
Good luck with that KO. Denison has been consistently awful on cross. He just dances around making zero point for 40 minutes and leaves a bigger mess than he arrived to.The person on the stand is pretty daft too, however in fairness to her she is managing to hold her a bit better than the numpty earlier on.
Hopefully JDs lawyer can get a KO on her before they finish for the day.
fecking hell.ass. $45MM in lost wages, good grief.
He ain't great.Good luck with that KO. Denison has been consistently awful on cross. He just dances around making zero point for 40 minutes and leaves a bigger mess than he arrived to.
He did good. He's good at exposing "experts" are not so expert at all and get to say Amber Turd on top of thatFfs. Total mess from Denison. He could have played the audio of Amber abusing & mocking Depp & asked if that would have impacted on her reputation as that audio came out at the same time as the Waldman tweets. Absolute crap from Denison once again.
It's pretty normal. Both sides do it, it happens in the UK too.So you're allowed to pay for your expert witnesses and that isn't a conflict? That's a bit batshit.
This is beyond farceThis woman is having a mare
Certainly seems like some of the backroom staff was asked to quickly change clothes and answer these questions.These people today aren't real people are they? This is a stage show.
Not sure that makes it any better. I can understand the need for it in some cases but I always assumed a level of independence.It's pretty normal. Both sides do it, it happens in the UK too.
Certainly seems like some of the backroom staff was asked to quickly change clothes and answer these questions.
Well, it's as useful as the jury decides it to be I guess. If you're just spewing the most blatant bias hyperbole like the Heard experts are then I doubt the jury will pay much attention. If you present actual evidence to back up your claims then you'll be more effective. It only makes sense that a professional is compensated for their time, can't exactly be free.Not sure that makes it any better. I can understand the need for it in some cases but I always assumed a level of independence.
I guess it depends who is on the jury.Well, it's as useful as the jury decides it to be I guess. If you're just spewing the most blatant bias hyperbole like the Heard experts are then I doubt the jury will pay much attention. If you present actual evidence to back up your claims then you'll be more effective. It only makes sense that a professional is compensated for their time, can't exactly be free.
Absolutely. It does almost always help if you can use some form of factual basis to back up your claims though. Most experts from both teams have been pretty weak tbh. There was one good financial witness for Depp a while back but I can't remember his name. Most other experts have been living on planet speculation.I guess it depends who is on the jury.
Why is he doing this
She could have just said she never watched and stops thereThis woman is having a mare