Exactly
How?
Well should Poch be excused? Both had a similar team of players and failed. Klopp hasn't got good owners either, but he majes Liverpool good.
I don't want either, but Boehly and the Chelsea ownership is clueless.
Yes you can. He failed to get results and wilted under the pressure.
I think the opposite will happen. I think it’s a done deal that he moves on. New owners often want there own man to come in and take charge then it will be all there own doing… they’ll want the glory for themselves rather than a manager they didn’t employ.
That’s actually a very important thing. We’ve only won the league under three managers - Ernest Mangnall, Matt Busby, and Alex Ferguson. We won our first two leagues in 1908 and 1911 and had to wait until 1952 before we won the league again. That was the first of five league wins under Busby, and of course we wouldn’t win the league again after 1967 until 1993, when we won the first ever Premier League, and the first of our 13 Premier League titles.
Yep I actually think Rashford is one of the main reasons we’re so bad. It has to be, he’s the only one that’s been in the squad since the LVG days. It’s like he’s immune to being sold though. We need to be ruthless. Think it’s harder for the club because he’s one of our own. But he’s just not good enough anymore. That hungry player as gone from inside of him. There’s no desire anymore.
It’s more about building a cohesive attacking unit, that works together, defends together or attacks together and Marcus is just not happy, only Arsenal and PSG would show real interest at the £80m United would want ?
Haven't sacked ten Hag and brought in the flavour of the month
I can't get over how quiet it is. Perhaps they don't want to completely derail us, but right now they're letting it go up in flames whilst they remain silent. That's how it looks from the outside.
Yeah a bit more noise could only help us at the moment. Our performances can't get any worse. Noise of a new manager might fire some of our players up again.
They could just sack him, get a temp in, and have the new guy ready on a pre-contract for this summer.
I don't see how they're dithering. It was clear from day one that the plan was to assess how the club is run, make the necessary changes then address the managers position. They were put in a tough spot taking charge half way through a season and of course the people they want to hire to run the football side can't join until the summer.
Would be my preference for a couple of months now. Seems they are still struggling with getting the people above the manager though which sucks
It doesn't take a few months to see how bad ETH is. His position is as important as the others. SJR shouldn't be saying we need top 4/5 for FFP if he's not going to sack ETH.
They are the ones in charge though? Pretty sure SJR get's his pick of managers and staff, correct?
They'd been trying to buy the club for 12 months. I mean, did they not watch us beforehand? Surely they did...
They seem like the type to do business under the radar though. No leaks which is a good thing right?
I think INEOS recognised that we had bigger problems at the club that needed addressing first and they want the people they hire (Berrada, Ashworth, Wilcox) to make the decision on sacking the manager and hiring the next one.
See the Omar Berrada hire. Media got wind of it then it was officially announced by the club within an hour or two.
Bigger problems? You can't get much bigger than a financial loss caused by a crap manager.
I didn’t think there was anything about that. A lot of us was shocked we managed to do it so quietly.
Doesn't that tell you it has more to do with the bloated squad and poor ownership than it does both those managers? Four managers have now tried and failed to lift that squad out if mid-table mediocrity. Say what you want about their tenures elsewhere, but I personally don't judge Poch, Potter, Tuchel or even Lampard on their time under Bohley.
Massively so. Bit bemused at people wanting us to be leaky and stuff being played out in the media for all to see? That was a huge negative under the previous regimes for me, constant briefings etc. predictably placed exactly when you'd expect them.
How are they dithery and indecisive? Typical brainless post after a bad result
What is this? When have the Glazers ever chipped in? We will either keep spending the club's own revenue to sign new players, or Ineos will help out with money from their own pockets. There will be a set budget before the window opens and the Glazers have nothing to do with our transfers anymore. They won't be able to interfere with our transfer dealings anymore. That was the whole point of Ratcliffe's investment. Total control of football operations. Like I said, predetermined budgets and no sign-off requirement from Joel or any other Glazer sibling.
