RedDevil@84
Full Member
He's a fecking robot! How the feck does he keep on playing, game after game, without getting injured??
I've just jinxed him now havent I?!

He's a fecking robot! How the feck does he keep on playing, game after game, without getting injured??
I've just jinxed him now havent I?!
He's a fecking robot! How the feck does he keep on playing, game after game, without getting injured??
I've just jinxed him now havent I?!
Bollocks. He was god awful vs brighton.I have been extremely critical of Bruno before the run of matches before Liverpool. But in 2025 he has been sensational. He has been a 7-9/10 every match so far this year.
I think there’s always going to be games where playing Bruno at CM is going to cause us issues, but he has shown it’s not only against inferior opposition that he can put in a performance there. He had good spells there in both the Liverpool and Arsenal games recently. I do think though, that he needs runners or players with intelligent movement ahead of him as he’s not the type to turn and hold the ball until something opens up, he prefers to be quick and incisive so he needs those options ahead.Thats my take as well. Obviously a late winner will influence perception of the overall performance but I thought, given the rest was a rather stale (yet professional) performance, Brunos performance was the best today. I even gave him MOTM.
People will always see what they want to see. People who think he is fantastic will watch him play and feel confirmed, people who criticize him will find evidence for that as well. It isn't as easy as pick one.
He might be our best CM against opposition that sits back. And as long as he played AM in AM areas, his defensive contributions compared to other AMs would be great - but he is playing deeper. I hope that Fbref will finally notice that and enable to compare him midfielders not only to AMs and wingers.
Genuine question, after all the posts in this thread and its predecessors, is this really what you understood of the criticism?
I also think, thats Amorims plan. But going forward, we need a more rounded partner for Ugarte. One with the same range of passing and comparable incisiveness as Bruno but stronger and more press-resistant. This new guy, Ugarte and Bruno, I think, this could be a very functional midfield with both grit, fight and quality on the ball. With Bruno able to tuck in when needed and move forwards when suitable. As part of a midfield two, I think it is only a plaster and nothing we should waste too much time on as I think, the potential isn't there to be a viable plan A.
Top of the league apparently some think? This thread reads like he's been holding us back for years.Where would we be without him?
He has been god awful a few more games then just Brighton. Then again, those games didn't really matter....right? As long as we are not relegated, everything is good.Bollocks. He was god awful vs brighton.
He probably epitomises, more than any other player, the post-Fergie era. Capable of individual brilliance that makes you think this team will go somewhere. Capable of such piss poor performances it gives you anxiety on how we will ever get out of this rut. Twas ever thus.
He may have good games and bad games but his work ethic can never be questioned, he will give his all for the team.
He will keep going till the 90th minute.
He probably epitomises, more than any other player, the post-Fergie era. Capable of individual brilliance that makes you think this team will go somewhere. Capable of such piss poor performances it gives you anxiety on how we will ever get out of this rut. Twas ever thus.
I think his bad games tend to be blown out of proportion. He's practically never worse than the team average. He gets flack partly because the difference between his top level and bottom level is more jarring (because he's actually a good player) but also because he's so involved in the game, which makes his mistakes more noticeable.
The thing I like about him is that regardless of how things are going, he will always put his hand forward. That trait in footballers is rare... when things dont go well, he wants the ball.
Very true. He never hides no matter how bad things get. The only time he noticeably cracked and gave up a run was when we were 5 goals behind with less than 30 minutes left or something. I can forgive that even if it was against a rival.
His mental resilience, fitness and off-pitch leadership qualities makes me feel sad that we never got to see him play for Fergie.
He probably epitomises, more than any other player, the post-Fergie era. Capable of individual brilliance that makes you think this team will go somewhere. Capable of such piss poor performances it gives you anxiety on how we will ever get out of this rut. Twas ever thus.
In the Liverpool game he played in front of Kobbie and Ugarte I think for majority of the match but still played it more midfielder-like than AM like. A way many of his critics wished for quite some time. Arsenal game we defended compact for majority of the game, which makes positioning less of a factor.I think there’s always going to be games where playing Bruno at CM is going to cause us issues, but he has shown it’s not only against inferior opposition that he can put in a performance there. He had good spells there in both the Liverpool and Arsenal games recently. I do think though, that he needs runners or players with intelligent movement ahead of him as he’s not the type to turn and hold the ball until something opens up, he prefers to be quick and incisive so he needs those options ahead.
Which is why I think we need to add a player that is a better fit for the CM role yet has some of Brunos strength. Against teams that sit back, I think Bruno is just fine. But at this point, we can't expect the majority of teams to play like that against us. It also needs to be said that even yesterday we scored from a keeper blunder and a sleepy defence (and a great finish by Bruno himself). So our attack is still underperforming.What’s been quite interesting is looking at his average position stats, it doesn’t move a great deal whether he’s in CM or AM, because he puts the defensive work in at AM and he’s miles above our other CM options when it comes to supporting the attack from there. We probably just don’t want him in the deeper role against fast runners in midfield.
But as you and others remind us all on a constant basis, he is our best and most important player, which obviously effects the expectations towards him. And he doesn't just gets flack for it, he is also praised for stuff like that - just experienced yesterday, where a clutch late winner turned a decent-to-good performance into something else for so many on here.I think his bad games tend to be blown out of proportion. He's practically never worse than the team average. He gets flack partly because the difference between his top level and bottom level is more jarring (because he's actually a good player) but also because he's so involved in the game, which makes his mistakes more noticeable.
What makes you think that?Yet, majority of fans would drop him in an instance.
What makes you think that?
If thats some attempt at victim complex, it is a bit odd. As with any players, there is a loud group on each side of the spectrum, his fanboys and his critics. Do you really think, the majority is against him?! And if not, why are you saying those things?
Believe me, I do. I hate myself for it a lot, but I do. And I still don't think the majority wants him out. Another case of confirmation bias maybe? Question is why would I want to see the majority behind him?Just scroll through the pages.
I understand that he frustrates certain MU fans, because he can be wasteful. But his importance to the team and his consistency can never ever be underestimated. The man is a chance creating machine and a goal machine as well. Very rare these days, specially in our team.
Personally, i have no idea how he is not a legend. Would walk in to some of our best ever teams and unlucky to be surrounded by average players for nearly a decade.
Our best player post SAF, our best captain post SAF and for me, easily a legend of United because i never got to see the likes of Law, Best, Charlton etc.
I'd say Son isn't too far off being a spurs legend. And odegaard has been at goons for about two seconds so the comparison is unfair5 years is not nearly a decade ffs
At big club you become legend by big number of apps, or big records/titles, something that he still hasn't achieved. Do you think the likes of Son are Spurs legend? Or is Odegaard Arsenal legend? When fldid we become fecking Arsenal and Spurs.
Wondering if this could work given both our strikers are not firing at the moment
--------------------------Bruno-----------------------------------
----Eriksen---------------------------Mainoo------------------
----Dalot------Toby-------Ugarte----------Amad------------
------------Martinez----Maguire------Yoro--------------------
Toby and Ugarte could be too defensive but they can free up front 3+Amad
But Bryan Robson captained a United team that finished in the bottom half, therefore he couldn't possibly be considered a United legend when you remove all context, right?Bryan Robson would still have been a United legend if he retired 2 years earlier and didn't win the PL.
20 goals + assists every season since he joined, if I read that correctlyAmad has been our POTY so far but Bruno isn’t far behind, yet again. Will pretty comfortably hit double figures for goals and assists once again.
Amad has been our POTY so far but Bruno isn’t far behind, yet again. Will pretty comfortably hit double figures for goals and assists once again.
I think he ‘only’ got 9 assists in his first half season but I believe he’s hit double figures for goals and assists in every year since. I mean, I’ve criticised him at times and questioned if he could thrive in anything other than a counter attacking set up but his stats are ridiculous, especially considering how shite we’ve been.20 goals + assists every season since he joined, if I read that correctly
Clearly Amorim needs to spend more time on the CAF. Clearly doesn't know ball if he rates Bruno.
Am I doing it right?
The problem is he often gets bullied in the EPL by more physical medfields. Against Rangers he was given plenty of time to pick a pass without being under too much duress.Clear MotM. Unpopular opinion but even though he scored the winner further forward, I like seeing him play the deeper role. It means we have an extra creative player in the side when he starts there and no other midfielder gives us that (Eriksen maybe, but he can’t run!)