Is it possible to have a bit of an explainer on this? Genuine question. Maybe it’s been answered before and you can point me to it but I don’t get why certain subjects are embargoed on the Caf when I see them discussed freely on other platforms.
As I understand it, it’s the individual posters who are in legal jeopardy if they were to libel an individual. Redcafe’s responsibility begins and ends at removing libellous content if the subject requests it and handing evidence over to police if requested.
I presume it must be more of a quality control thing than a legal thing?
As I understand it, it’s the individual posters who are in legal jeopardy if they were to libel an individual. Redcafe’s responsibility begins and ends at removing libellous content if the subject requests it and handing evidence over to police if requested.
I presume it must be more of a quality control thing than a legal thing?