So the manager is at fault if the striker misses chances?
I'd be more worried if we weren't creating much like last season.
My sentiments exactly.
A few points:
1, The manager puts out the tactics and players need to implement them.
2, If you concede a goal against CFC, in 30 seconds, the manager cannot be blamed for that.
3, If Smalling stands off a CFC player, making error after error, you can't blame the manager. Had Jose subbed Smalling at half time, maybe we wouldn't have conceded 4 goals, but Smalling's (weak) confidence would be shot to pieces.
4, Then you have games where we dominate, create numerous chances but can't score. Again, tactically, we were great in these games, but our players could not put the ball into the net. Jose cannot be blamed for this. He never told our players to miss these chances.
5, The GKs of opposing teams were having the best performance of their lives, which did not help.
Incidentally, yesterday Burnley played and leaked 4 goals! So Heaton's MOTM at OT was a one-off performance. Again, not Jose's fault.
6, Then lets look at AFC. We dominated that game. Tactically, we were better, but we failed to win. Could Jose be blamed for letting in a goal @ 88 minutes? Not sure about that one. Some have said that Rashford was completely to blame. Some have said that Jose should not have made those subs, yet Mata was tiring. In fact, Rashford himself (who stood off Chamberlain) also looked tired.
Basically, the players need to stand up and be counted and not hide behind our managers who are getting fired, but the players responsible are surviving.
This manager sacking mentality perhaps has filtered into the heads of our players. Under Fergie, the players knew that if things when wrong, they'd be out the door. Under Moyes/LVG/Jose, the players believe that they are untouchable, so when they are losing a game, they won't be fighting on the pitch for their MUFC careers...where under Fergie, that's exactly what they'd be doing.