Think you're letting him off lightly there, he could and should easily have had 2 or 3 yesterday.
No because I don't think he missed any sitters except the one he stole it from the defender.
It's a suspended ban.
meaning?
Urm, they are. Obviously they don't but when a striker shoots it's supposed to hit the back of the net. That's the general idea.
It's not enforced until they're done for something else.
Nothing (providing their fans keep out of trouble for the next 2 years).
If this happened there won't be missing chances and it will be more like a hand ball game .
I think your definition of easily and everyone else's differs hugely. He only missed one good chance the 1v1 with the goalie. The other chance was the shot from an acute angle on his wrong foot where he hit the side netting. You don't expect a striker to score that, you only hope they do. Strikers either miss or have those shots saved 90% of the time.
so basicly if we are loosing the final we make problems with lyon fans and we end up as there replacement andwe got only a suspended ban
))I'm not one to criticise Rashford for missing chances but I think you're being kind on that one. He has to at least hit the target with the side netting one.
This.
I know. We are Manchester United ffs. Not one single Celta player would get a game for our team yet everyone panics.
Sums it up pretty well.
Its like a warning. For next 2 years they will be watched for similar problems. If they do the same mistake then the ban comes in to effect from the next year when they qualify to Europe. Right now they can continue to play this campaign even if crowd trouble effected in any of their games.
Sorry to inform you that having a big name doesn't necessarily translate into performances on the pitch. Nor does it give you a divine right to beat teams you see as lesser.
Let's agree to disagree. Hitting the target from a narrow angle, on your wrong foot, while the ball has a spin taking it further wide.. is not easy. And there are no rewards just for passing it straight at the goalie, who is basically covering the entire angle there, and calling it a "shot on target". You have to put power on it to hopefully go in off him or through his legs. Adding power to a shot on your wrong foot will 9/10 result in sending it high or wide. Like I said, form what I see the vast majority of those chances either go wide or are easily saved by the goalie. It was a chance for sure, but the expectation on him to score there is bizarre for me.
4th + Europa winners qualify.
Perhaps not, but ffs it's Celta Vigo.
The issue is that we are not currently a top side, despite what people may think.
I feel playing away in the second leg is advantage. The home team gets under lot of pressure when they concede away goals, which overrides their advantage of first leg. For instance, Anderlecht needed a goal to go through yesterday!
Won't United be the fifth English team in the CL next season if we win the EL but finish outside the top 4? Or is that only for CL winners?
And they needed just one extra in over 60 minutes so ensure you would've needed to score two more. If Celta keeps a clean sheet in the first game, they just need a scoring draw to proceed at OT. First leg home or away really doesn't make that much of a difference.
But aint beating Man United.They beat Barca and Madrid this season.
Possibly no Ibra for the whole season alsoaway to Arsenal and Spurs after the two legs, ffs.
Those two weeks will make or break our season.
