Central midfield this season...

RedThaiDevils#7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
5,825
Location
Married with Manchester United, In love with Giggs
Big problem today was the gap between the MF's and the Fwd's, liverpool were winning the second ball and attacking us and Suarez linked the ball up well.

Rooney's enthusiasm was gone and if we play Berbs, we need more of the ball.

Anyhow, it was well done by Liverpool to close down our MF any how, they knew Scholes/Carrick didn't have the legs in them so they out played us...

Was good on paper at first glance, but SAF should have got a fwd to drop down and link up the play more... Rooney hasn't been doing his job that well and his touches have been letting him down.
 

RedThaiDevils#7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
5,825
Location
Married with Manchester United, In love with Giggs
Carrick is the shit black and white print to Keane's HD.
No complaints, we definitely need a new Keane again...

Its got to be like in 2006 where we're looking for a holding player who will allow us to dominate 4-4-2 again...

Candidates would be
Modric for Scholes
Hamsik for Hargreaves.
Sahin/Goetze/Kagawa ( Dortmund has been playing dominant football with them three )

Pastore would be a luxury buy and would be too pricey, but I definitely see him the big deal in the coming years.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,375
Our midfield is like a leaking pipe. It's still technically doing it's job of moving the water around and it's somthing you can cope with and at times, when the leak appears to have stopped, you think it's OK. But then it starts to leak again.

The reality is though, to fix it, you need to rip it out and start again.
 

wr8_utd

:'(
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
38,262
Central midfield? What central midfield? We don't have one this season for most of our away games.
 

apotheosis

O'Fortuna
Joined
Apr 4, 2010
Messages
5,234
Location
waiting for everyone else to catch up!!
We.didn't have one last season either. i hope saf buys a fecking midfielder in the summer
He should have bought one last summer! Having just tied up lucrative new deals for our central midfielders, can anyone really see Fergie going out and buying more than one mid?

Imo we need at least 2. We need someone like Sahin who can orchestrate the play from deep, and someone like Goetze who can add a bit of pace and dynamism in the final third.

If we only sign 1 player he will have to be fecking unbelievable to have any really positive effect on the current level of general stagnation.
 

MadDogg

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
15,978
Location
Manchester Utd never lose, just run out of time
Playing a 442 with Scholes and Giggs making up two of the midfield four? Away? Against Liverpool?

It was never going to work. Poor team selection from Fergie there, we either needed to go with a three man central midfield or have Fletcher playing instead of one of Scholes or Giggs.
 

FreakyJim

90% of teams play better football than us
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
9,083
Location
Glazers Out
With Carrick and Fletcher signing new deals it looks more and more like we won't have a midfield next season either.
 

Sylar

Full Member
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
40,507
We need an injection of pace and hunger. And creativity (somebody to control the midfield)

Not too much to ask for ...
 

Stookie

Nurse bell end
Joined
Jun 5, 2008
Messages
9,118
Location
West Yorkshire
I hope we strengthen in the summer, its frustrating watching your rivals splash out whilst we sit there with no apparent clout. Could we be in danger of doing an Arsenal?
 

Bear Attack

Full Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2009
Messages
3,779
Our midfield is back to its poverty of 2005/2006.
Pretty much. And the sad reality is that in spite of this catastrophic performance, Sir Alex will probably remain adamant in his stance with regard to the central midfield department. Our midfield has been quite pedestrian ever since the end of 2007. The truth is that he has left this as a gaping problem for a long and I can't see him fixing it. I have a really bad feeling that we aren't going to splash money on a capable midfielder this summer either. Tough times, these.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,749
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
Pretty much. And the sad reality is that in spite of this catastrophic performance, Sir Alex will probably remain adamant in his stance with regard to the central midfield department. Our midfield has been quite pedestrian ever since the end of 2007. The truth is that he has left this as a gaping problem for a long and I can't see him fixing it. I have a really bad feeling that we aren't going to splash money on a capable midfielder this summer either. Tough times, these.
He fixed it after the poverty of 2005. He will do so again.
 

Name Changed

weso26
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
27,395
Location
Dublin
The decision not to play Fletcher was absolutely stupid. He was one of our better midfielders against Chelsea. Carrick was poor in both games. Poor decision that cost us badly.
 

RedLars

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2006
Messages
2,743
Dunno if anyone's point it out yet but we had 57% possession today, away from home.

How is that possible with a midfield as ineffective as the one portrayed in this thread?
In the second half Liverpool pretty much just sat back and let us pass the ball around. And it was clever, because we hardly ever looked like creating anything of danger. Only hint of creative spark came from Giggs, but it was far from enough on the day.
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
^^^ Right, we had most of that possession in front of them and they were happy to let us have it, sitting at 2-0 waiting for us to commit so they could hit us on the break.
 

Ole's_toe_poke

Ole_Aged_Slow_Poke
Joined
Jan 7, 2009
Messages
36,846
Dunno if anyone's point it out yet but we had 57% possession today, away from home.

How is that possible with a midfield as ineffective as the one portrayed in this thread?
I don't think possession means much. Its what you do with it. Defensively the midfielders were poor.

All the passing was done infront of their 2 banks of four and at a very slow pace. We weren't incisive. We didn't really hurt them except in the last 10 mins and this is a Liverpool team with a terrible defense. Glen Johnson wouldn't have had an easier game and he is fecking shite.

They looked like scoring every time they broke.
 

Badunk

Shares his caf joinday with Dante
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
12,954
Location
Occupied Merseyside
I hate it when we go out with a whimper against Liverpool. I have to live amongst these scouse twats. Every feckin one of them thinks they're a comedian.

Fergie, please, for the love of god, buy some fecking quality midfielders in the summer. I'd even take Charlie Adam at this rate.
 

Alex

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
41,955
Location
____
Dunno if anyone's point it out yet but we had 57% possession today, away from home.

How is that possible with a midfield as ineffective as the one portrayed in this thread?
We really seemed to get caught out a lot for only giving them 43% possession that was the problem.
 

Commadus

New Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
7,405
Dunno if anyone's point it out yet but we had 57% possession today, away from home.

How is that possible with a midfield as ineffective as the one portrayed in this thread?
If you look at the goals - Suarez should never have been able to dribble past 3 players. Nani mistimed header and VDS mistake.

Thing is Liverpool sat back and packed their defence we just put aimless crosses into the box which Skrtel and Kyriagos ate for lunch.

We never stretched Liverpool enough - it was only when Hernandez came on and attacked the near post did it pull their defenders out of position and create some half chances for us.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,217
Location
Hell on Earth
We were 2 or 3 goals down and who do we bring in? Fletcher? Not exactly a match winner. We have too many workman like players. We someone who can open up defences. Scholes can do it only in certain types of matches. He was overrun or bypassed in yesterday's match.
 

Commadus

New Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
7,405
We were 2 or 3 goals down and who do we bring in? Fletcher? Not exactly a match winner. We have too many workman like players. We someone who can open up defences. Scholes can do it only in certain types of matches. He was overrun or bypassed in yesterday's match.
Opening up defences requires good runs from the forwards and good passing from the midfield we had neither.

Barca and Arsenal at times play some majestic football because they move the ball quickly and have runners and players who can stitch moves together.
 

manusteve

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2001
Messages
1,928
The decision not to play Fletcher was absolutely stupid. He was one of our better midfielders against Chelsea. Carrick was poor in both games. Poor decision that cost us badly.
On the radio they said that Fletcher had felt poorly all week so don't know if that had anything to do with it.

THAT SAID, I think it was it was wrong not to play 3 central midfielders. I don't care what statistics may show as regards the success of the various combinations of centre-midfielders but Scholes and Carrick was always going to be ineffective. They just occupied the same kind of space in front of our back four and going no further than midway in Liverpool's half.

We should have had Gibson/Fletcher to plug the gaps in there, and played only one up front (take your pick).

We had lots of possession yes, but much of it was wasted.

I wouldn't like to see Carrick and Scholes in tandem for ANY games for the rest of the season. Personally, I would prefer Carrick-Fletcher-Anderson/Gibson. I don't think that this season Scholes has contributed any more incisive passes than Carrick could manage.
 

Alex

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 4, 2007
Messages
41,955
Location
____
We were 2 or 3 goals down and who do we bring in? Fletcher? Not exactly a match winner. We have too many workman like players. We someone who can open up defences. Scholes can do it only in certain types of matches. He was overrun or bypassed in yesterday's match.
I agree it would have been nice to be able someone with more quality going forward
 

Shimo

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
8,082
Park has been out for fecking ages
Valencia even longer. Point is both those guys can give us something more when chasing a game. Also, it has meant in their absence Giggs, Nani have shouldered a lot of the burden.

We definitely lacked energy in CM yesterday. Scholes IMO was everywhere and wanted the ball, unfortunately in a game like yesterday Carrick's weak point where he doesn't step up his energy levels in a game like this didn't help. He needed to provide at least to a degree what Fletch/Ando provide but, wasn't able to.

Carrick / Scholes these days against a very motivated CM, it's a tough ask for them.
 

Kelvin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 16, 2006
Messages
21,342
Our central mdifield is a fecking joke, its unreal we still have to rely on Scholes, this is crazy.
 

RedThaiDevils#7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 30, 2004
Messages
5,825
Location
Married with Manchester United, In love with Giggs
Yeah, which is a shame.

If he does retire, we definitely will have to reconsider at least a new MF. 1 for Hargreaves which is a certain that he won't play.

Giggs has already signed a new contract and we know how good he is at CM.

Here's worried more about the wing situation with Obertan/Bebe' not offering enough to actually ask for a spot on the bench...

I'd rather seek Hargreaves replacement, we have young Cleverly who will be converted into a Wing/CM player somehow as he can play every position in MF for Scholes.

So Who do we replace Hargreaves with ? Hargreaves was the successor to Keane, had the pace, the passing, the crossing and the energy, if he never had the injury... who knows, we might won the CL two years straight and would never have lost last years PL.