Changes in CL format

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,746
Location
C-137
How exactly do they plan on fitting a 14 game league part in when there's only 6 games currently, and the schedule is already jam packed?
There used to be two group stages, plus qualifying.

Had Leeds got to the final in 2001, or Liverpool in 2002, or United in 2003, they'd have played 19 games.

This 14 game group phase, plus Quarters, Semis and a Final would also be 19 games
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
27,254
Supports
Real Madrid
There would be no football without the match-going fans. No one wants to watch Manchester United play against Real Madrid in an empty stadium.
You think that's even a possibility?
 

Cardboard elk

Full Member
Joined
Jan 9, 2019
Messages
697
Supports
Rosenborg
I remember when my club got to the QF of CL. Stuff like that will never ever happen again. Smaller nations and clubs are getting squeezed out and hang to dry bit by bit.

David vs Goliath won't happen in the future, and it is a real shame. Redbull London vs Coca Cola Madrid at Nike stadium in 2045 Adidas Euroleague finals. The ref will of course be a AI computer and 50% of the match will be commercials.
 

Carl

has permanently erect nipples
Joined
Mar 6, 2008
Messages
45,495
Remember when you used to qualify from your group of 4 to end up in another group of 4.

Those were the days.
 

RedCoffee

Rants that backfired
Joined
Sep 18, 2010
Messages
1,755
Great idea. We should be playing teams like Barca and Real every season not once every 5 years.
 

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,746
Location
C-137
Why would the ECA, that represents 232 European Clubs, propose a closed competition for 32 of its members.

To create a new, more democratic governance model that truly reflects the key role of the clubs
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,987
Premier League already up in arms.
As they rightly should be. I fail to see what any PL club stands to gain from any of these super league ideas. The PL already makes much more money than the rest of them, with numbers that keep going up. I don’t understand why the PL would want to join a venture where the only real benefit is for non English clubs to get more money.

And let’s be honest, any of these European super league ideas need the English teams to gain any traction.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,977
The fact that there are "mega clubs" and that they have more power than national FAs is exactly what's wrong with the game.

Greed, greed, and more greed.
Welcome to the real world where individual companies have more power than state government (eg Amazon 2nd HQ).

Why should football be different?

Of course we like to see the big boys up against each other, but it has also started to become too boring/predictable with the same teams meeting over and over, and I'm getting quite sick of the race for top 4 too.

Going back to Champions only will not only give small teams a possibility of getting a little deeper into the competition, improving their situation, but it could also improve competition in the domestic leagues as nobody is settling for 4th place finish each year. It would also improve the Europa League as it will inevitably have stronger teams.

There are quite a few positives to going back to the old format. The biggest negative for everyone involved is loss of money for the big boys, but boo hoo for them.
PSG will probably be delighted with this, makes their quest to win the CL so so much easier.

The biggest negative is the huge drop in the number of glamour ties in the CL, and that's a loss for all football fans.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,850
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Welcome to the real world where individual companies have more power than state government (eg Amazon 2nd HQ).

Why should football be different?
:lol:

I refer you to Amazon being a bitch and pulling out of New York. Let me guess. You think New York will collapse as a result.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,977
To Lithuanians, it definitely is. You're not saying Lithuanians are too inferior a people to deserve being allowed to root for their own teams?


Viewers prefer to have an emotional stake in watching their team defeat other teams. Are you really more involved in watching the 4th placed Spanish team play the fouth of Serie A, than you are seeing your own team or countrymen play say... "the champion of Country X"? I bet you only watch the highlights of the first, if that.

Unless the results of the game had been epic. Like how Real Madrid - Ajax was received and made headlines all over the world, exactly because it was a high rated Spanish team being kicked out by a supposedly chanceless team. Will you remember a 3-0 win by Tottenham over Dortmund from that same night, or a 1-4 victory over Real Madrid by a small team nobody thought could win because of having a tenth in budget?


Sadly arrogance leads bigger countries to think they're automatically entitled to a bigger share of the pie to the point the rest can't even get to fight over the crumbs, because they're not allowed to participate. In the real world, this is called corruption. In the minds of people like yourself, it's "only logical that superior competitions get superior representation and superior parts of the pie to ensure we not just stay, but become even more superior".


How would you feel if your country's teams could never even attempt to play for the biggest cup in Europe? Just for fun, imagine no Spanish, Italian or English teams participating in Europe for 20 years. Imagine you being a fan having to root for teams you have no personal connection with whatsoever, no rivalry towards whatsoever. Now imagine living in one of these small countries and being snubbed at, because you haven't won anything in 40 years, even though you havn't been allowed to participate in 40 years because you're too small. It's a case of the rich enriching the rich and trodding on the little guy.

Knock-out cups are fun, exactly because cup fighters can rise above themselves over two matches, which they likely couldn't repeat in a longer competition. Hence why we have Willem II (position 10/18 in the Eredivisie) in the Dutch cup finals and a team like Calais RUFC (sadly Calais RUFC, a team in 2000 consisting of teachers, dock workers and office clerks) made it to the French cup finals in 2000 (lost to Nantes 1-2, despite leading 1-0). Bankrupt, Calais was liquidated in 2017 over a few hundred thousand debt.

But yay we get to see teams with half a billion in debt win in the CL in no small thanks to buying players with their massive, unchecked debts. Debts that nobody adresses despite "financial fairplay"! Such funs for the neutral observer that corrupt money wins by default... Great messaging too:

"If you're not rich, you don't matter".
"If you're not already entitled, don't bother, because you're not going to be given a chance to succeed."
"Nobody likes you because you're poor/small."
"If you don't already have a tradition of winning, why should you become one of the potential winners?"
"If you're from nation X you're a lesser person than if you're from nation A."
"Everyone's equal, but Brits, Italians and Spanish are more equal."

That's what sportsmanship is about according to you, right? Who got the most money? Should we also just tell 95% of the Olympic contestants to sod off then? Because hey, who watches the Olympics when non-rich people can partake?


Anyway. The idea of these bigger CL groups is simply to ensure that the teams with most money stand a better chance of not being knocked out due to a fluke failure. The less matches there are, the less chance they have of correcting their point losses and the more unpredictable results will be. Predictability is bad for emotion. I would say this change is a horrendous proposal designed to stifle competition. It's another Coup d'État by the bigger teams, possibly a Coup de Grace for smaller clubs who'll have no chance left to compete. Even if they manage unicorn epic wins against a team they normally wouldn't beat considering finances.

Awful idea. Champions League for champions I say, both big and small. Knock-out rounds only. No preferential seeding. Pure chance.
The Lithuanian champions FK Sūduva did actually get a place in the CL qualifying round, they made it to round 2 and lost 5-0 on agg to Crvena Zvezda.

They actually did get a place and lost in a pure knockout round just as you advocate, what are you complaining about?
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,977
:lol:

I refer you to Amazon being a bitch and pulling out of New York. Let me guess. You think New York will collapse as a result.
Is that why Cuomo has almost been begging Bezos to reconsider?

If you don't favor the big company, they will just go elsewhere.

If you don't have a CL that's favorable to mega clubs, they will also go elsewhere.
 

adexkola

Doesn't understand sportswashing.
Joined
Mar 17, 2008
Messages
48,850
Location
The CL is a glorified FA Cup set to music
Supports
orderly disembarking on planes
Is that why Cuomo has almost been begging Bezos to reconsider?

If you don't favor the big company, they will just go elsewhere.

If you don't have a CL that's favorable to mega clubs, they will also go elsewhere.
Cuomo doesn't count, otherwise Bezos would have his way. He didn't though, and left like a bitch. City still thriving.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,977
Cuomo doesn't count, otherwise Bezos would have his way. He didn't though, and left like a bitch. City still thriving.
Let's not get further away from the CL and into the Amazon HQ2 issue.

The point is, if the CL reverts to the old EC format, the mega clubs will simply leave and set up shop somewhere else, much like Amazon not going to NY.

I doubt the CL will thrive without the original G14.
 

Halds

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2016
Messages
737
Location
Denmark
Supports
Liverpool FC
Awful idea. Champions League for champions I say, both big and small. Knock-out rounds only. No preferential seeding. Pure chance.
Only quoting your last part, but brilliant post all of it!

I agree. Get back to the old format. Winners in the European Cup, the rest of the best in Uefa Cup, and cupwinners in the Cupwinners Cup. No seeding, knockout all the way. Three different cups, all of them with prestige.

I know it aint gonna happen because of the money involved, but one can dream. Why have we allowed money to be the main factor on how football is structured?
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
230
Supports
Ajax
The Lithuanian champions FK Sūduva did actually get a place in the CL qualifying round, they made it to round 2 and lost 5-0 on agg to Crvena Zvezda.

They actually did get a place and lost in a pure knockout round just as you advocate, what are you complaining about?
They got a place to try to get a place. What am I complaining about when some loser #4 gets in without any pre-rounds?


Are you dense, or just pretending to be?
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,821
Great idea. We should be playing teams like Barca and Real every season not once every 5 years.
It's because we play them so infrequently, that it becomes a special game.

Talk to Chelsea about PSG when they used to draw them regularly. It became dull.
 

pacifictheme

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Messages
7,821
Much more fun watching the champions of Lithuania or whoever than the 2nd placed team from Spain. :rolleyes:
Well just fyi before moneyball teams from "lesser leagues" were actually pretty great.

Plus it eliminates the whole "top 4" shite and makes the other european competition mean more, which is a good thing.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,977
They got a place to try to get a place. What am I complaining about when some loser #4 gets in without any pre-rounds?


Are you dense, or just pretending to be?
If they struggle to even get through qualifying, what's the point of giving them a full round 1 place? :rolleyes:

Well just fyi before moneyball teams from "lesser leagues" were actually pretty great.

Plus it eliminates the whole "top 4" shite and makes the other european competition mean more, which is a good thing.
Now you want the bigger European leagues to do what? Give away their TV revenue to the smaller leagues? :eek:

Destroy the Champions League to make the Europa League better. What a ridiculous idea.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
230
Supports
Ajax
Let's not get further away from the CL and into the Amazon HQ2 issue.

The point is, if the CL reverts to the old EC format, the mega clubs will simply leave and set up shop somewhere else, much like Amazon not going to NY.

I doubt the CL will thrive without the original G14.
Yeah right. Because if your team doesn’t play the G14, then you won’t support your team in another league?

Have you noticed that people watch football teams in domestic leagues that don’t have the G14?

Yes?

The only reason there is focus on the “big teams” is the numbers of domestic viewers in the competition those are from. The only reason the CL has more teams from these competitions is to ensure more of those people watch, because they DIDN’T WATCH WHEN THEIR TEAM WASN’T PARTICIPATING.
 

Cal?

CR7 fan
Joined
Mar 18, 2002
Messages
34,977
Yeah right. Because if your team doesn’t play the G14, then you won’t support your team in another league?

Have you noticed that people watch football teams in domestic leagues that don’t have the G14?

Yes?

The only reason there is focus on the “big teams” is the numbers of domestic viewers in the competition those are from. The only reason the CL has more teams from these competitions is to ensure more of those people watch, because they DIDN’T WATCH WHEN THEIR TEAM WASN’T PARTICIPATING.
No, the focus on the big teams is the number of fans those teams themselves have.
 

SirAF

Ageist
Joined
Sep 28, 2003
Messages
37,784
Location
No, the focus on the big teams is the number of fans those teams themselves have.
You’re fighting a losing fight in here, but you are spot on. I totally agree with you in matters like these.
 

pacifictheme

Full Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2013
Messages
7,821
If they struggle to even get through qualifying, what's the point of giving them a full round 1 place? :rolleyes:


Now you want the bigger European leagues to do what? Give away their TV revenue to the smaller leagues? :eek:

Destroy the Champions League to make the Europa League better. What a ridiculous idea.
Selective reading at its finest. What a ridiculous post.
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2019
Messages
230
Supports
Ajax
If they struggle to even get through qualifying, what's the point of giving them a full round 1 place? :rolleyes:
Ok. So dense it is.

If all your good players are taken from you because of the earnings (particularly from those participating in the Champions League), creating in a few decades a huge financial discrepency between the “big” teams (who were put into the CL because of bigger local, DOMESTIC audiences rather than Euro audience as a whole), then it gets very hard to compete.

And then it turns out you can lose in one round and only earn a small amount of ticket money.

On the other hand, those who were given free tickets to the CL got millions for no reason. Millions that are more than many teams have in their budget.

And you then confuse the consequence with the cause, mostly because you’ve got a personal stake into having your shitty fourth ranking team in the CL to earn that free money to beat up financially smaller teams from other nations and then argue “see? They are inferior, who would watch that? Not me, I don’t even know where Lithuania is, because it’s not in England, so who of my English friends (the only people I consider mattering in the world) would watch that?”

If you can’t figure it out from here, you shouldn’t even bother.

Check out which teams won the Europa Cup I and note that the big leagues were not that big. And yes, people watched. And cared.

Now you want the bigger European leagues to do what? Give away their TV revenue to the smaller leagues? :eek:
They stole it from them by taking their screen time in the European Leagues, so I can imagine that is one way to return to a more equal playing field.