Donaldo
Caf Vigilante
I paid Apple 2 quid for this. For this, I tell you.
I paid Apple 2 quid for this. For this, I tell you.
So did you like it or no?Watched this now, and just...why?
A completely uninteresting relaying of a story of a perfectly uninteresting man, who is perfectly placed in a footnote of the abominable history of mankind. Einstein in his 3 lines was more interesting than fecking Oppy. Cillian Murphy did his best with a character with the depth of a sheet of paper, and with god awful writing and dialogues to boot.
The supporting cast isn't good, it's just random famous/familiar faces one after the other, with no particular reason for them to be there than "Oh, Chris Nolan called and I very well couldn't say no could I haha". Emily Blunt's "that one scene" turned out to be the dampest of damp squibs, and she ended up being the mumbliest of all the mumbly Nolan actors.
Nolan's edits and direction have moved from avoidable irritants to just flat out terrible now. I felt like I was tolerating this movie for almost the entire runtime. NOT ANY MORE I'M NOT, CHRIS.
The Oscars are a joke.
4/10. Minus one for not actually reading out Sanskrit, you poser.So did you like it or no?
Which one?Speaking of that sex scene... What the feck was that?
If you told me that one of the big name Hollywood directors is a virgin then I would put all my money on it being Nolan.
The one where the blonde one just stops halfway through and goes to read a book.Which one?
I thought you meant the 'imaginary' one tbf.The one where the blonde one just stops halfway through and goes to read a book.
Let me guess - you thought Barbie-Gerwig-Margot Robbie should've won insteadWatched this now, and just...why?
A completely uninteresting relaying of a story of a perfectly uninteresting man, who is perfectly placed in a footnote of the abominable history of mankind. Einstein in his 3 lines was more interesting than fecking Oppy. Cillian Murphy did his best with a character with the depth of a sheet of paper, and with god awful writing and dialogues to boot.
The supporting cast isn't good, it's just random famous/familiar faces one after the other, with no particular reason for them to be there than "Oh, Chris Nolan called and I very well couldn't say no could I haha". Emily Blunt's "that one scene" turned out to be the dampest of damp squibs, and she ended up being the mumbliest of all the mumbly Nolan actors.
Nolan's edits and direction have moved from avoidable irritants to just flat out terrible now. I felt like I was tolerating this movie for almost the entire runtime. NOT ANY MORE I'M NOT, CHRIS.
The Oscars are a joke.
BBBRAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMM.
What in this film did you feel was made "unnecessarily more complicated" considering half of it is about a scientific project? What about Oppenheimer comes across as pseudo-intellectual?Watched this the other day and was a bit...underwhelmed. Starting to feel like Nolan is getting too full of himself and making movies unnecessarily more complicated than they need to be to appear more pseudo-intellectual.
The movie didn't really make me care for Oppenheimer and the constant jumping around in time just took me out of it. At least it was easier to follow than Tenet...
Guess again.Let me guess - you thought Barbie-Gerwig-Margot Robbie should've won instead
Dark Knight trilogy, no?Was this not the easiest, by far, Nolan film to follow? Ok maybe Insomnia was his easiest but excluding that.
Dunkirk?Was this not the easiest, by far, Nolan film to follow? Ok maybe Insomnia was his easiest but excluding that.
WouldYouEverStoppenheimer.4/10. Minus one for not actually reading out Sanskrit, you poser.
Apart from Tenet, are his films actually difficult to follow?Was this not the easiest, by far, Nolan film to follow? Ok maybe Insomnia was his easiest but excluding that.
I don't personally think so but some of the comments in this thread lead me to believe some do.Apart from Tenet, are his films actually difficult to follow?
It seems like it's a piece of criticism often used against him, there's sometimes some narrative choices that aren't Fast & Furious level of basicness, but it's hardly complex cinema to follow. And this isn't a knock on him, I love most of his films.I don't personally think so but some of the comments in this thread lead me to believe some do.
The scientific project stuff wasn't the complicated part. It was how Nolan chose to tell the story, jumping across scenes prematurely without developing the dialogue and also the continuous jumping between Oppenheimer's hearing, Strauss's confirmation and the Los Alamos scenes felt unnecessary. Although I know that's how Nolan likes to tell his stories, he's starting to use it as a way to make his movies appear more complex than they actually are and not spending enough time to develop his characters.What in this film did you feel was made "unnecessarily more complicated" considering half of it is about a scientific project? What about Oppenheimer comes across as pseudo-intellectual?
Watched this now, and just...why?
A completely uninteresting relaying of a story of a perfectly uninteresting man, who is perfectly placed in a footnote of the abominable history of mankind. Einstein in his 3 lines was more interesting than fecking Oppy. Cillian Murphy did his best with a character with the depth of a sheet of paper, and with god awful writing and dialogues to boot.
The supporting cast isn't good, it's just random famous/familiar faces one after the other, with no particular reason for them to be there than "Oh, Chris Nolan called and I very well couldn't say no could I haha". Emily Blunt's "that one scene" turned out to be the dampest of damp squibs, and she ended up being the mumbliest of all the mumbly Nolan actors.
Nolan's edits and direction have moved from avoidable irritants to just flat out terrible now. I felt like I was tolerating this movie for almost the entire runtime. NOT ANY MORE I'M NOT, CHRIS.
The Oscars are a joke.
£1 per nork. That's value.I paid Apple 2 quid for this. For this, I tell you.
The edit I had had covered her in a little black dress, if norks are what I assume they are.£1 per nork. That's value.
I think that was cgi'd on for certain international markets. I'm surprised that's the version on Apple.The edit I had had covered her in a little black dress, if norks are what I assume they are.
I pay 1/10th the cost of subscription by hanging on to my India account while living outside, I'm not complaining. The Hindi subtitles (instead of English) were particularly challenging in a movie with the worst sound I've heard in some time though...I think that was cgi'd on for certain international markets. I'm surprised that's the version on Apple.
Can't tell if you're joking or not. It took me until three quarters of the way into Dunkirk to realize the timelines of everything that was going onDunkirk?
I quite like Nolan. I was a bit of a fanboy back in the day, even. I've liked almost all his works (barring Tenet which I think was just not very good at all) But I genuinely don't understand the point of this movie. My view doesn't stop others from liking it.