City defence

Grinner

Not fat gutted. Hirsuteness of shoulders TBD.
Staff
Joined
May 5, 2003
Messages
72,287
Location
I love free dirt and rocks!
Supports
Arsenal
is extremely shit considering the amount of money spent on it. How many free headers did Berbatov get today? Fletcher was unchallenged for his goals and I even noticed little Park winning headers in the box. Giggs cut through it at will, and only Given saved them from a thrashing.

So is it because they are still gelling or are they just rubbish?
 

Canuckred64

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
3,638
Location
Canada
City look good going forward, but their defense today was horrid. Richards went to sleep and allowed the first United goal and even on the winner, Owen was left all alone on his side. Toure and Lescott showed again why I feel the money spent on them was wasted, Fletcher scores two goals on free headers and Berbatov if not for Given would have had a couple more. Where was the centre defenders on those crosses. Even Bridge didn't have the best of games.
 

Alwyn

Got rid of his pee
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
11,613
Location
-)
Haha. A mastercard-esque gif is required.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,810
Location
india
is extremely shit considering the amount of money spent on it. How many free headers did Berbatov get today? Fletcher was unchallenged for his goals and I even noticed little Park winning headers in the box. Giggs cut through it at will, and only Given saved them from a thrashing.

So is it because they are still gelling or are they just rubbish?
Thing is, most of their team are either cast offs from teams from the big four or good players outside the top four. Apart from Robinho and Adebayor, the rest are mostly player who weren't good enough for the top teams.

Bridge wasn't good enough for Chelsea.

Lescott is very overrated and would never be first choice for any of the top four sides.

Bellamy wasn't good enough for Liverpool, but i do rate him, i just don't think he's consistent.

Toure was getting worse and worse for Arsenal and they're better off without him.

Richards is not a right back but is a poor defender right now.

Gareth Barry and Tevez are arguable cases. Tevez arguably wasn't good enough for us because we had two strikers who first choice and then him.

I'm not trying to say they're rubbish because obviously they're not. They scored two against us and four against Arsenal. They are good going forward but i'm just trying to put things into perspective. They had such few shots on goal all game, and scored from two gifted goals, we missed a bucket load of chances and on another day it could have been 5 or 6 nil to us. My point is that despite all these signings they still have a lot of players who were rejected by other top premiership sides so their defence for example is actually a bit average.
 

AttackingFlair

Full Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
9,654
It's funny how you have one of the quickest and strongest defenders in the league in Richards who gets ripped apart by a 35 year old Giggs.

I fecking love Giggs.
 

twitchchris

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2005
Messages
538
I was really surprised to find out, after the match, that Lescott was on the field. I did not notice him at all, and only found out about his being there by reading this article on football365.

Totally anonymous today.
 

Dumbstar

We got another woman hater here.
Joined
Jul 18, 2002
Messages
21,286
Location
Viva Karius!
Supports
Liverpool
Refereeing incident aside, Man City never looked like winning this game. Not because they couldn't score or take the lead but simply because you knew who was defending and how.

I know Liverpool have hardly set the world alight defensively but I still feel we're in first gear back there. Man City are playing as best as they can and will not finish top 5, let alone top 4. Everton to make a late surge for 5th.
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
43,662
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
Defenders can take time to bed into an established defence , (Evra and others) so a whole defence will take even longer. Here's hoping they'll be shit even then.
 

beergod

Full Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
2,749
is extremely shit considering the amount of money spent on it. How many free headers did Berbatov get today? Fletcher was unchallenged for his goals and I even noticed little Park winning headers in the box. Giggs cut through it at will, and only Given saved them from a thrashing.

So is it because they are still gelling or are they just rubbish?
I would say it is a little of both. None of the three English players good enough to challenge for starting positions with the national team. They clearly didn't have a good understanding of who was going to close players down outside of the 18, which I thought was a bit odd considering they were playing with Barry and De Jong in midfield.
 

anything about now

MUFC lad living in a matriel world
Joined
Nov 18, 2007
Messages
6,503
Exactly. We had all sorts of problems in the past few seasons against Dunne even when we had Ronaldo and Tevez.
 

December_16

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2005
Messages
7,501
Location
Mancunian Way
I was surprised at how many crosses we pumped into their 18, and had a pretty strong feeling it was our game-plan today. Toure-Lescott in front of Given, that's why.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,810
Location
india
City will never win anything with Hughes in charge.
You don't rate Hughes? He did a very good job with Blackburn and so far has bought very well with City in attack. He got the best players he could in an attacking sense.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,810
Location
india
But i do think defensively he's done an average job in the transfer market. At their best Spurs have a much better defense than them. Richards, Toure and Lescott aren't great defenders. The best of that lot was very good at one point for Arsenal but over the last two seasons has forgotten how to defend. Richards is rubbish at defending. Lescott is so overrated it's ridiculous. It's different defending in an organized team like Everton which is workman like and where Jagielka wins everything in the air.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Their defence was great! I wish them all the best :)..
 

Spammy

Being watched; will learn to post in the correct f
Joined
Nov 7, 2006
Messages
27,116
Location
Gloves are worn for traction primarily. Someone li
You don't rate Hughes? He did a very good job with Blackburn and so far has bought very well with City in attack. He got the best players he could in an attacking sense.
He may have done a decent job at Wales and at Blackburn. But having seen some of the choices he's made at City, I just don't think he has the brains for managing a top team. It's not hard to recognize players like Adebayor and Robinho are good players, it also shouldn't be hard to recognize that SWP isn't an attacking midfielder, Dunne was their best CB and that Elano was one of their cleverest attacking players. This season he's plumbed new depths by playing Robinho on the left of a flat midfield, Ireland with no attacking freedom (until yesterday), Richards as an awkward attacking fullback and I know he'll persist with Bellamy and SWP even when their form inevitably drops and he's got better players wasting on the bench.
 

Vinay

Muppet in Training
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
5,932
Location
Mit der deutschen Mannschaft
The only thing I can of it is that a defence doesn't click in immediately. There are a lot of little things to adjust in the coordination and communication, I presume. And the centre of the defence is completely new, which is not to help things in any fashion. Lescott and Toure have it in them to be a formidable pair, I am sure...
 

GaryLifo

Liverpool's Secret Weapon.
Joined
Feb 26, 2001
Messages
10,817
Location
From here to there
Because United were brilliant?

Not easy to defend against one of the best teams in the world.
amazing isn't it mate?

Every time we put in a top performance and beat a decent side it's all about their deficiencies rather than that we have looked mustard in our last two prem games.

I guess all these cnuts supporting other sides honestly thought we were a one man team and once Ronaldo went we'd be fighting relegation.

Have some of that you shit cnuts! United are playing better now than we did last season
 

jgraham

Company man, hitched.
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,496
Location
punching cats for eggs at a dustbin near you
Whilst not being a defender, one player who's job it was to help out the back 4 today impressed me. De Jong - his reading of the game and timely interventions were pretty good I thought. For me he was one of their better players until he was replaced for a more attack minded player.
 

surf

Full Member
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
6,717
Location
In the wilderness
Ferdinand, Vidic and Evra are miles ahead of anything that City have, and they've played together a lot, and it's United's biggest advantage over City. City's back 4 is OK-ish by prem standards but it's never going to be good enough to challenge for the title and will get ripped apart by an attacking side on song like yesterday.
 

Ekeke

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2006
Messages
53,328
Location
Hope, We Lose
Any side with Micah Richards and Joleon Lescott in defence is going to give up goals on a regular basis. Given must feel like he's playing behind Newcastle's defence again.
 

pillory

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2007
Messages
8,449
Location
Symptomless coma
The 4-3 goal is interesting. City were hoping for a counter attack when Rooney's freekick was cleared towards Tevez, which is fair enough, but they had four guys pushing forward even when Rooney was in possession again, and Ireland is in fact still running upfield in the still below, when Rooney's last hoof is on its way down. That leaves us 3 vs 3 on the edge of the box and 3 vs 0 in a vast area of the middle of their half, which is where the ball was always likely to end up. Though Ireland would have been able to get to Giggs in time if he was just a couple of yards closer. Twats.

 

Laphroaig

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2008
Messages
17,900
Location
Gandhinavia
The 4-3 goal is interesting. City were hoping for a counter attack when Rooney's freekick was cleared towards Tevez, which is fair enough, but they had four guys pushing forward even when Rooney was in possession again, and Ireland is in fact still running upfield in the still below, when Rooney's last hoof is on its way down. That leaves us 3 vs 3 on the edge of the box and 3 vs 0 in a vast area of the middle of their half, which is where the ball was always likely to end up. Though Ireland would have been able to get to Giggs in time if he was just a couple of yards closer. Twats.
Well worth pointing out that Tevez was very much at fault for that goal. He should've taken down a clearance and controlled possession, but decided to head it straight back to us instead.
 

davisjw

Full Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2007
Messages
5,287
Thing is, most of their team are either cast offs from teams from the big four or good players outside the top four. Apart from Robinho and Adebayor, the rest are mostly player who weren't good enough for the top teams.

Bridge wasn't good enough for Chelsea.

Lescott is very overrated and would never be first choice for any of the top four sides.

Bellamy wasn't good enough for Liverpool, but i do rate him, i just don't think he's consistent.

Toure was getting worse and worse for Arsenal and they're better off without him.

Richards is not a right back but is a poor defender right now.

Gareth Barry and Tevez are arguable cases. Tevez arguably wasn't good enough for us because we had two strikers who first choice and then him.

I'm not trying to say they're rubbish because obviously they're not. They scored two against us and four against Arsenal. They are good going forward but i'm just trying to put things into perspective. They had such few shots on goal all game, and scored from two gifted goals, we missed a bucket load of chances and on another day it could have been 5 or 6 nil to us. My point is that despite all these signings they still have a lot of players who were rejected by other top premiership sides so their defence for example is actually a bit average.
Bridge wasn't better than A. Cole however he was very good for Chelsea before then.

We laugh at their defense when we had 3 put by us, one of which was completely our star defender's fault. They'll buy more in January but De Jong is very good for his age as is Kompany. When both are playing in the middle it's very tough for teams to sit on the ball like we did.

If they played defensively with:

------------Given------------
Richards-Toure-Lescott-Bridge
-----Kompany---De Jong-----
------------Barry------------

You'd have a tough time breaking that down. Plus if you look how they played against Arsenal, it was a completely different performance.

Not "defending" City but they aren't to be thrown out.
 

Tevez's Mum

Kia Joorabchian's Ho!
Joined
Jun 8, 2007
Messages
2,540
Location
Sale, Greater Manchester
They were shocking defensively and were saved on numerous occasions by excellent saves from Given.

Hard to tell whether they have properly gelled yet. But I think you would have to give them more time. Just look at Evra and Vidic, they both took a fair amount of time to properly gel with the rest of the squad. City have made some major changes, not just in defence but all over the park, so its abit soon to expect them to be at their best. They really did just fall to bits though against us. But I suppose they could say the same about our defence.
 

amolbhatia50k

Sneaky bum time - Vaccination status: dozed off
Joined
Nov 8, 2002
Messages
95,810
Location
india
Bridge wasn't better than A. Cole however he was very good for Chelsea before then.

We laugh at their defense when we had 3 put by us, one of which was completely our star defender's fault. They'll buy more in January but De Jong is very good for his age as is Kompany. When both are playing in the middle it's very tough for teams to sit on the ball like we did.

If they played defensively with:

------------Given------------
Richards-Toure-Lescott-Bridge
-----Kompany---De Jong-----
------------Barry------------

You'd have a tough time breaking that down. Plus if you look how they played against Arsenal, it was a completely different performance.

Not "defending" City but they aren't to be thrown out.
The point is not that they aren't good defensively but that their defence is not top four standard. And i was highlighting that by saying that much of their defence isn't good enough for the top teams ATM.

Bridge wouldn't displace Clichy, Evra or Cole.

Lescott and Toure wouldn't break Vermalen-Galas, Rio-Vidic, Terry-Carvalho partnerships. Lescott is very average. Both weren't the best defenders at their previous clubs.

Richards is an average defender.

My point is not to have a go at City. It's just to say that go easy on City in this respect. They will clearly spend a lot more of their defense in the future and not to expect that much from them right now.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2002
Messages
52,781
Location
Founder of IhateMakeleles.org and Gourcufffanboysa
amazing isn't it mate?

Every time we put in a top performance and beat a decent side it's all about their deficiencies rather than that we have looked mustard in our last two prem games.

I guess all these cnuts supporting other sides honestly thought we were a one man team and once Ronaldo went we'd be fighting relegation.

Have some of that you shit cnuts! United are playing better now than we did last season
This.
 

FranklyVulgar

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2007
Messages
10,266
Location
I've got a pretty little mouth underneath all the
Richards and LEscott are easily the most over-rated defenders in world football. Both have shit control, average at best passing and positional sense suited to the championship. They are both physically impressive with good pace but that doesnt make you a great defender.

It's typical overhyping. say what you will about big man JT but he can defend and doesnt rely on pace to keep him out of trouble.

City now have a good side no doubt about that but not THAT many of their players would be key players for a genuine top 4 side. You could argue with this but i really wouldnt expect any more than Adebayor, Robinho and Tevez to get regular football for a top 4 side. Bridge couldnt cut it at chelsea, Toure was great for a while but he hasnt been the same. Barry was never top 4 class etc etc

They are getting there, and now have a team to beat 85-90% of premiership teams without too much trouble.