He's quite good isn't he? It took a while for him to get going but looks in good touch now. interesting how Fulham are playing him as a lone striker over Healy and others as well.
Agreed. I heard that Bradley kid is supposed to be quite good as well.Best American outfield player at the moment it seems, he has really improved over at Fulham
He'd make the squad alright but I don't think he is the step up in class they need to challenge the top 3.would make the Liverpool squad.
He's always mentioned as the best American player by the meida, but he's not. He's only in the MLS because he couldn't cut it in Europe. He went to Germany, couldn't get a regular spot, came back to the states. Most people who really watch the sport don't care for Landycakes.He'd make the squad alright but I don't think he is the step up in class they need to challenge the top 3.
Also, isnt Donovan meant to be the best American footballer? He definately seems to good for the MLS.
All American players perform great against the Mexicans. We're a bunch of game raising cnuts against that nation that still think they're the class of this region. Mexico are much like Liverpool in that sense - they still think they belong in the elite category.Donovan is a nifty player and great technique, but doesn't quite have the physical strength in him.
He is great against Mexico mind.
Been following MLS and U.S. national team for sometime now I'm in the U.S. for a period of time.He's always mentioned as the best American player by the meida, but he's not. He's only in the MLS because he couldn't cut it in Europe. He went to Germany, couldn't get a regular spot, came back to the states. Most people who really watch the sport don't care for Landycakes.
He was by far our best player in the last world cup, from midfield, and has seemed the part at Fulham as a striker, so it'd be hard to classify him as better at either position. Definitely destined for a bigger club though after this season.Dempsey is much better as a midfielder IMO than as a forward. Fulham have been sticking him up top by himself.
spot on with Donovan... very overhypedolesmyhero said:He's always mentioned as the best American player by the meida, but he's not. He's only in the MLS because he couldn't cut it in Europe. He went to Germany, couldn't get a regular spot, came back to the states. Most people who really watch the sport don't care for Landycakes.
Dempsey is much better as a midfielder IMO than as a forward. Fulham have been sticking him up top by himself.
Failed twice in Europe, seems comfortable playing in LA, has the talent to be a very, very good player, does he have the drive? -it appears notHe'd make the squad alright but I don't think he is the step up in class they need to challenge the top 3.
Also, isnt Donovan meant to be the best American footballer? He definately seems to good for the MLS.
I think he could've done well if he decided to not be a pussy and try to fight for a spot in Germany. Moving back to the MLS really stopped his maturing as a footballer. Also, I think the last 6 or more of his goals have been penalties, so it's not like he's overly gifted as a forward.I don't think that Donovan is as overrated as some claim. He is the United States all time leading goal scorer and he is only 25 years old. His problem is that he doesn't have the same drive and determination to succeed that Dempsey, Adu, or Beasley have had. I think that Donovan would still do ok as a second striker in the premiership or in spain at a mid table club.
As for the topic at hand, I think Dempsey probably is the best American outfield player right now with Donovan coming in a close second. As a striker, Dempsey is no where near the standard of United, Liverpool, Arsenal, or Chelsea. As a right wing (which is his natural position), he could maybe be a good squad player.
Bradley is a top class prospect. Olsen should probably play more for the US but it's obvious to see that Bradley will end up the best midfielder in US history if he continues at his current rate. Shame that O'Brien couldn't shake those leg injuries - the guy could hit gnat from 30 yards.Bradley is a decent player who's profile has been helped greatly by the fact his dad is the U.S. national coach and plays him when possible over more talented players like Ben Olsen.
Tucked in behind the striker(s) or out wide? His wide game is limited because his crossing is shit. But he takes on players much like Ronaldo will. When wide he plays more as an inside forward than traditional winger. He's strong, good in the air, and has good ball skills hence why he's played up front for the national team of late (Fulham more do to injuries/lack of forwards). I think putting him at right wing with Johnson and McBride up front could work wonders for Fulham. That said, I don't know if Johnson will be cut for the Premiership level - he blew hot and cold in the weak MLS. Fulham are really missing McBride and Radzinski.Agree. IMO the US best player at the moment, better as an attacking MF than striker.
Djemba > BradleyAgreed. I heard that Bradley kid is supposed to be quite good as well.
Imbecile.would make the Liverpool squad.
agreed, he's too good for liverpoolImbecile.
Even after they got stuffed by the Argies in the last World Cup?All American players perform great against the Mexicans. We're a bunch of game raising cnuts against that nation that still think they're the class of this region. Mexico are much like Liverpool in that sense - they still think they belong in the elite category.
on a second note, while he may not have Kuyt's talent as a defensive striker I think he could do better than to play for a team who is 7th in the league.Imbecile.
Arguez was highly thought of coming into MLS but for some reason DC never gave him a shot, even in a cup game. He was allowed to train with Hertha this offseason and they were so impressed they bought him. He's been playing with their first team in friendlies during the German winter break and really impressing.Heard on FoxSoccerReport last night that Szetela is heading to Brescia on loan. From wiki: On January 29, 2008, Szetela was loaned out to Serie B side Brescia Calcio. The loan will last until June 30, 2008, with the option to purchase at the end.
Adu article on FSW... http://msn.foxsports.com/soccer/story/7740152/Sometimes-you-have-to-leave-to-find-home-...
Bryan Arguez (have no clue) has signed for Hertha Belin. He's 19 and was drafted in the first round by DC United in 2007. He never appeared for DC United in teh 2007 season.
Is Johnson supposed to play this weekend?Give Dempsey a strike partner and all hell could break loose. With Johnson in the team I think Fulham will avoid the drop.
he's not on the teamsheets that I've seen.Is Johnson supposed to play this weekend?
Two overhyped players and the coaches son.... demonstrating a real grasp of American soccer right there.he's not on the teamsheets that I've seen.
I don't think Dempsey is even a top 3 player for USA. Donovan, Adu, and Bradley all seem to be more influential. At least with the national team.
We'll see vs. Mexico.
He was important in a victory against Switzerland, and did well in his first @ South Africa.Adu has yet to make any impact at all on the senior national team, but does seem to finally be progressing like we all had hoped. That said, Altidore looks the better prospect.
This is just a myth. Leverkusen didn't want him to leave. Landon wasn't happy there because he loved home. He only had one bad performance, and the other moments was actually pretty good for Leverkusen. Even against Liverpool, he had one very good performance at Liverpool, and then struggled in the return match.Donovan shines in the MLS, but it's the damn MLS. He couldn't cut it in Europe, as was demonstrated in Leverkusen, and he doesn't have the confidence to stick it out. He has the pace and skill to be a good player, but doesn't seem to have the mentality to exploit his talents. Even just from his generation, I'd take Beasley before I took Donovan.
Check out the Eridivisie Tables. I don't need to say a thing, his performance with his club speaks for itself.Bradley is a solid player by American standards. There is no doubt about that, but influential is hardly a word I'd use to describe him.
Hardly qualifications for being one of the top 3 most influential players for the US, as you claimed.He was important in a victory against Switzerland, and did well in his first @ South Africa.
You're absolutely correct... His performances with his club speak for themselves. Yet, they still fail to speak for his International performances.Check out the Eridivisie Tables. I don't need to say a thing, his performance with his club speaks for itself.
That may be true, but apart from the 2002 World Cup his International performances haven't been anything special.Donovan is the one player you named that could be considered most influential for the US, which is all this argument was about.This is just a myth. Leverkusen didn't want him to leave. Landon wasn't happy there because he loved home. He only had one bad performance, and the other moments was actually pretty good for Leverkusen. Even against Liverpool, he had one very good performance at Liverpool, and then struggled in the return match.
Then perhaps I should have said going forward?This is how threads get soo far off topic. People make stupid arguments then back them up by talking about something completely different than their original point. If you want to say that those players are the 3 most influential for the US, then talk about their performances for the US. Easy enough.