Skizzo
Full Member
Because I don’t watch cricket and don’t have time to research too much. Any more questions?Kyle mills - why?
Because I don’t watch cricket and don’t have time to research too much. Any more questions?Kyle mills - why?
I know his stats look good in this context but he's quite shitBecause I don’t watch cricket and don’t have time to research too much. Any more questions?
I’m just here to make up the numbersI know his stats look good in this context but he's quite shit
He is quite shit but surely his stats in this context is all that matters? If player x is completely useless but had great performances in the World Cup, surely he is better pick than someone who is great outside the World Cup but didn’t really perform in the World Cup?I know his stats look good in this context but he's quite shit
When somebody looks at this thread and is a casual.. Kyle mills stats won't matter.. sad but true..He is quite shit but surely his stats in this context is all that matters? If player x is completely useless but had great performances in the World Cup, surely he is better pick than someone who is great outside the World Cup but didn’t really perform in the World Cup?
There is a reason why Lara was picked quite late in the draft
That just highlights the point that specific drafts are pointless then.When somebody looks at this thread and is a casual.. Kyle mills stats won't matter.. sad but true..
Ah well.. Point takenWhen somebody looks at this thread and is a casual.. Kyle mills stats won't matter.. sad but true..
Yeah.. In specific drafts like this, it’s important to have some good discussion and highlight players performancesThat just highlights the point that specific drafts are pointless then.
Yeah, I think if there are many scan voters then these kinds of drafts don't work. Well, we'll see.That just highlights the point that specific drafts are pointless then.
Yep, that is a genuine problem. Not sure how the footy drafts handle this though, especially when they have those Serie A Peak players like drafts.Yeah, I think if there are many scan voters then these kinds of drafts don't work. Well, we'll see.
Personally I've been poring over stats when compiling my shortlists but it's a safe assumption that a genuine GOAT with fairly average WC/ICCCT figures will draw more favourable appraisals than a nobody with those same numbers.Yeah.. In specific drafts like this, it’s important to have some good discussion and highlight players performances
Have you seen those threads? It's hardcore stuff. Casual scan voters are identified and shot.Yep, that is a genuine problem. Not sure how the footy drafts handle this though, especially when they have those Serie A Peak players like drafts.
I will keep in mind to vote based on my whim in those threads going forward. Thanks for the heads up.Have you seen those threads? It's hardcore stuff. Casual scan voters are identified and shot.
Does that mean, their votes are not counted ?Have you seen those threads? It's hardcore stuff. Casual scan voters are identified and shot.
They are counted but good luck just voting and fecking off without at least mentioning why.Does that mean, their votes are not counted ?
I will keep in mind to vote based on my whim in those threads going forward. Thanks for the heads up.
So that's what I've been doing wrong all this timeWhen you vote in a general election you don't put a cross in the box then write your reasons underneath!
I usually look at the 2 teams, weigh up who I think would win if they played each other and vote for them. My reason would be the same every time i.e. 'I think they are the stronger team and would win in that match situation'!
@The Red ViperWho's turn is this ?
If I'm not wrong his 8hrs pick time had passed by now ?
Just gone I think?If I'm not wrong his 8hrs pick time had passed by now ?
You may be right. ChrisNelson's 'ended' at about 3am and so The Red Viper has had his eight hours?If I'm not wrong his 8hrs pick time had passed by now ?
The thread opening post has clear a clear message saying only Serie A performances are counted. In addition, because there is so much discussion and number of voters are significantly higher than here, the impact of scan voters is limitedYep, that is a genuine problem. Not sure how the footy drafts handle this though, especially when they have those Serie A Peak players like drafts.
That's not usually the case for the cricket drafts. Most people don't explain why they voted for one team over the other. If you go through the history of the cricket drafts, most match ups don't reach page 3, but you will see around 20-25 votes for the same.The thread opening post has clear a clear message saying only Serie A performances are counted. In addition, because there is so much discussion and number of voters are significantly higher than here, the impact of scan voters is limited