Darwin Núñez | Liverpool player | Sometimes maybe good, sometimes maybe shish

SilentWitness

ShoelessWitness
Staff
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
30,669
Supports
Everton
I'd keep him and just play him as a wide forward. I think in that respect you can deal with his erratic nature and he can still cause 'chaos'. 31 goal contributions is very good but he doesn't have that killer instinct that top strikers do. They hugely overpaid and he's not the CF they thought would elevate them but he can still be useful for them. Keep him out wide where he can get an angled shot from through balls or outside the box which he seems to be much better at than one on ones through the middle.
 

MiceOnMeth

Full Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
1,812
Still only 25 next season. Could be a Drogba or a Vardy and peak late nearer to 30.
 

KiD MoYeS

Good Craig got his c'nuppins
Joined
Feb 1, 2010
Messages
32,987
Location
Love is Blind
He's a human ping pong table. A chaos merchant. And he has been unable to deliver in one of the more chaotic attacking sides in the world. How many ridiculously fluke goals have Liverpool scored under Klopp. They are set-up to score them. And Darwin can't. The incoming baldie won't fancy him.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,127
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
Some interesting names in the top 10 worst big chance converters. You'd kind of expect it it be the 10 worst strikers in Europe but that's definitely not the case.


10 Players With Worst Big-Chance Conversion Rates in Europe in 23/24
RankPlayerClubConversion Rate
1.Darwin NunezLiverpool19.4%
2.Dusan VlahovicJuventus21.7%
3.Akor AdamsMontpellier26.1%
4.Nicolas JacksonChelsea29.2%
5.Pierre-Emerick AubameyangMarseille32.1%
6.Robert LewandowskiBarcelona33.3%
7.Samuel OmorodionDeportivo Alaves33.3%
8.Alvaro MorataAtletico Madrid34.4%
9.Erling HaalandManchester City34.8%
10.Vinicius JrReal Madrid36.4%
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,710
Supports
Real Madrid
Yup. Sometimes you win…
The lesson is you have highly paid professionals whose job it is to scout and recruit, and you should not trust your coaching staff over them when it comes to it
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,971
Location
France
Some interesting names in the top 10 worst big chance converters. You'd kind of expect it it be the 10 worst strikers in Europe but that's definitely not the case.


10 Players With Worst Big-Chance Conversion Rates in Europe in 23/24
RankPlayerClubConversion Rate
1.Darwin NunezLiverpool19.4%
2.Dusan VlahovicJuventus21.7%
3.Akor AdamsMontpellier26.1%
4.Nicolas JacksonChelsea29.2%
5.Pierre-Emerick AubameyangMarseille32.1%
6.Robert LewandowskiBarcelona33.3%
7.Samuel OmorodionDeportivo Alaves33.3%
8.Alvaro MorataAtletico Madrid34.4%
9.Erling HaalandManchester City34.8%
10.Vinicius JrReal Madrid36.4%
The reason you see big names is largely because one of the most important quality for top forwards is the ability to put themselves in good goalscoring opportunities. They give themselves more chances but they are not actually more clinical, with some exceptions.
 

Pogue Mahone

The caf's Camus.
Joined
Feb 22, 2006
Messages
134,127
Location
"like a man in silk pyjamas shooting pigeons
The reason you see big names is largely because one of the most important quality for top forwards is the ability to put themselves in good goalscoring opportunities. They give themselves more chances but they are not actually more clinical, with some exceptions.
Yeah, it's the same way you usually see the top scorers taking way more shots than most other players. They miss loads of shots but without taking all those shots they wouldn't rack up the goals.

That said, I do think there is something fundamentally wrong with Nunez in front of goal. The way he keeps making a balls of huge chances in really important games is getting past the point of coincidence.
 

Mike Smalling

Full Member
Joined
Jan 27, 2018
Messages
11,141
That said, I do think there is something fundamentally wrong with Nunez in front of goal. The way he keeps making a balls of huge chances in really important games is getting past the point of coincidence.
Yeah, in two seasons the compilation of comical misses is simply too long. It's a combination of a bad lack of composure and some questionable finishing technique in certain situations. I remember one game last season (against Wolves I think), where he dragged the same chance well wide three times in a row.

He makes up for it with great physical attributes and good movement. But top sides need that forward that will score his chance in a tight game and/or get you a goal out of nothing when it matters. I don't think Nunez will ever be that for Liverpool.
 

KeanoMagicHat

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
4,058
He gets into a shit ton of good positions. It is possible that they work on his finishing and he'd be an excellent striker.
They’ve been saying that for a few years and it hasn’t happened. Salah and Suarez missed a few when they started but picked up quickly. If anything he’s getting worse.

Also he gets into positions but ends up dominating his areas so more accurate players don’t get to shoot. He takes far too many shots in general - composure or an extra pass would go a long way. The opposite of Firmino, who helped others flourish.
 

erikcred

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2022
Messages
1,808
They’ve been saying that for a few years and it hasn’t happened. Salah and Suarez missed a few when they started but picked up quickly. If anything he’s getting worse.

Also he gets into positions but ends up dominating his areas so more accurate players don’t get to shoot. He takes far too many shots in general - composure or an extra pass would go a long way. The opposite of Firmino, who helped others flourish.
In other words, The Lukaku.
 

CM

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2014
Messages
7,406
I'd keep him and just play him as a wide forward. I think in that respect you can deal with his erratic nature and he can still cause 'chaos'. 31 goal contributions is very good but he doesn't have that killer instinct that top strikers do. They hugely overpaid and he's not the CF they thought would elevate them but he can still be useful for them. Keep him out wide where he can get an angled shot from through balls or outside the box which he seems to be much better at than one on ones through the middle.
Agreed. An erratic finisher like Nunez is never going to contribute enough as your main source of goals. He has some useful attributes as a player but as you say, I think those are better suited for someone in wider areas.

Jota is far more instinctive in front of goal. If I was the next manager coming in, I'd be using him as the CF from their existing options and looking to sign a new striker alongside. Liverpool could be in a bit of trouble if they don't get a decent goalscorer in because Salah looks ready for the bin on current form.
 

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,546
But but but he has a decent xg or whatever metric the modern fan base use these days
 

Gio

★★★★★★★★
Joined
Jan 25, 2001
Messages
20,342
Location
Bonnie Scotland
Supports
Rangers

Classic Darwin. Close your eyes and smash it.
His thought process there is so fundamentally broken. In certain circumstances there is nothing wrong with getting a hard shot away as quickly as possible, sacrificing accuracy for speed. Usually when the striker is under high pressure, the keeper is unsighted, and there is a lower chance of scoring because there are bodies or distance in the way. Not one of those applied there. The guy's a big idiot.
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,710
Supports
Real Madrid
In other words, The Lukaku.
Lukaku doesn't take a lot of shots though. That's a huge part of the problem with him. Darwin shoots twice as much as Lukaku averages over his career
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,921
Feel he's having a decent year and has the skillset to do well for them. Carragher is just so unobjective when he's emotional because Klopp's farewell tour has been a disaster, their recruitment has been a bit whack which is probably why they broght Edwards back in.

They had Mane - Firmino - Salah as a front three and now have a lot of 'ok' to 'good' players in Gakpo (average), Diaz (good), Jota (good), Nunez (good) and Salah who is elite but older and likely leaving. Of all of them Nunez is the only one I'd say with any kind of real potential promise given his age and having a few more years to build on until he hits his peak.
 

Adz_99

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 18, 2024
Messages
247
Feel he's having a decent year and has the skillset to do well for them. Carragher is just so unobjective when he's emotional because Klopp's farewell tour has been a disaster, their recruitment has been a bit whack which is probably why they broght Edwards back in.

They had Mane - Firmino - Salah as a front three and now have a lot of 'ok' to 'good' players in Gakpo (average), Diaz (good), Jota (good), Nunez (good) and Salah who is elite but older and likely leaving. Of all of them Nunez is the only one I'd say with any kind of real potential promise given his age and having a few more years to build on until he hits his peak.
Nunez turns 25 in a month. He's not that young.

Peak for a modern footballer is probably somewhere between 23 and 30.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,311
Location
Blitztown
Some interesting names in the top 10 worst big chance converters. You'd kind of expect it it be the 10 worst strikers in Europe but that's definitely not the case.


10 Players With Worst Big-Chance Conversion Rates in Europe in 23/24
RankPlayerClubConversion Rate
1.Darwin NunezLiverpool19.4%
2.Dusan VlahovicJuventus21.7%
3.Akor AdamsMontpellier26.1%
4.Nicolas JacksonChelsea29.2%
5.Pierre-Emerick AubameyangMarseille32.1%
6.Robert LewandowskiBarcelona33.3%
7.Samuel OmorodionDeportivo Alaves33.3%
8.Alvaro MorataAtletico Madrid34.4%
9.Erling HaalandManchester City34.8%
10.Vinicius JrReal Madrid36.4%
The difference between 1 in 3 and 1 in 5 is gigantic though. It’s always been the case that those who score most, miss most. Goal scoring is very hard.

Having said that, Jackson’s percentage doesn’t appear anything like as bad as I’d have thought. I’d have had him alongside Nunez based on watching him.
 

Hammondo

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2015
Messages
6,924
The reason you see big names is largely because one of the most important quality for top forwards is the ability to put themselves in good goalscoring opportunities. They give themselves more chances but they are not actually more clinical, with some exceptions.
100 percent. Creating top chances is harder and more important than being particularly clinical.
 

Bobski

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2017
Messages
10,019
The difference between 1 in 3 and 1 in 5 is gigantic though. It’s always been the case that those who score most, miss most. Goal scoring is very hard.

Having said that, Jackson’s percentage doesn’t appear anything like as bad as I’d have thought. I’d have had him alongside Nunez based on watching him.
Ability to get on the end of the things is just as important as pure finishing ability. Which is the problem some people are seeing with Hojlund, good finisher but concerning that he struggles so badly to get shots off, even with sup optimal service.
 

Bwuk

Full Member
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
17,364
I‘d have him at United ….there I said it!
So would I.

It's not clicking for him at Liverpool, but there's something there with Nunez. I don't think he's a number 9 though.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,311
Location
Blitztown
Ability to get on the end of the things is just as important as pure finishing ability. Which is the problem some people are seeing with Hojlund, good finisher but concerning that he struggles so badly to get shots off, even with sup optimal service.
With Hojland it’s that we don’t create any opportunity for him to even attempt one touch finishes.

I remember 28 of Haalands first 33 goals for City were one touch. They carve out so many opportunities for him to shoot first time as so much work has been done to create the chance. I don’t know what the stats are, but I’d imagine his 2-3 touch goal percentages are close to someone like Hojland. They’re both finishers and only one of them gets good service. It’s so rare to see Hojland miss a proper chance. He’s always got defenders around him. Part of that will be movement, but I still think it’s more about chance creation.
 

erikcred

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2022
Messages
1,808
So would I.

It's not clicking for him at Liverpool, but there's something there with Nunez. I don't think he's a number 9 though.
He's an impact sub at best. Can't build a title challenging team with him as a starter.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
17,921
I‘d have him at United ….there I said it!
I think there's a good player in there as well. If your issue as a young(ish) forward is finishing but you're getting loads of chances, it's a good problem to have.
 

erikcred

Full Member
Joined
May 6, 2022
Messages
1,808
I think there's a good player in there as well. If your issue as a young(ish) forward is finishing but you're getting loads of chances, it's a good problem to have.
Yes, but if this issue has lasted for 2 years playing under the best and most attacking manager the club have had for decades, things can only go downhill from here.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,824
With Hojland it’s that we don’t create any opportunity for him to even attempt one touch finishes.

I remember 28 of Haalands first 33 goals for City were one touch. They carve out so many opportunities for him to shoot first time as so much work has been done to create the chance. I don’t know what the stats are, but I’d imagine his 2-3 touch goal percentages are close to someone like Hojland. They’re both finishers and only one of them gets good service. It’s so rare to see Hojland miss a proper chance. He’s always got defenders around him. Part of that will be movement, but I still think it’s more about chance creation.
There’s been many balls put across the goal that he’s not there for
 

Rob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2009
Messages
3,232
Supports
Liverpool
He’s a weird one. Incredibly frustrating and at the same time, I can’t help but feel there’s a 25 goal a season striker in there somewhere.

Be interesting to see what Slot thinks of him,
 
Last edited:

Ludens the Red

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2009
Messages
17,504
Location
London
He’s your standard modern day battering ram forward in that he’s a fantastic athlete but technically as a striker he is extremely lacking. Like Nicolas Jackson, and like Emile Heskey and Kevin Davies before.
These players will never ever be clinical because they are not refined footballers. They happen to be tall, fast and strong and so gave football a go.
We are in an era of football where being technically refined is giving way to strength, pace and workrate which allows for two of the biggest clubs in the country to be playing with these type of players as their first choice centre forward.
Even if he one season magically manages to score 20+ premier league goals. The following season his numbers will drop.