Day 20: Brazil vs. Colombia

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,588
I've never been gutted when a team has won the World Cup (only experienced 3 lol) but I'll be gutted if Brazil win the thing. Dirty play, biased referees. Can't stand these cnuts.
 

Snake Plissken

Aka LTS10
Joined
May 6, 2010
Messages
7,188
I dont think its corruption, I think it's just sheer luck the Brazilians are continually bailed out by the refs.

I hope Germany hump them.
 

Jaytay

Full Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
2,868
Hope Brazil beat Germany, they may have got favourable decisions but I prefer Brazil to win it than the Germans. I think Brazil will be up for it, hopefully Neymar will be alright to play.
 

didz

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
1,963
I seriously don't get why you're all slating the referee. He let the game flow and got all big decisions spot on.

Congrats Brazil, showed great spirit. Shame for Colombia, really like their team.
Having seen the replay of the Yepes goal, I pretty much agree that at least most of the decisions were right. Still uncertain about whether James actually committed a foul for the Luiz goal. He pulls away from making any contact.

As for the letting the game flow thing -there were 0.6 fouls per minute. Yellows to Fernandinho (who keeps on getting away with this, somehow) and Paulinho in the first half would have greatly reduced that. The referee had more screen time than any of the players, which is usually a bad sign on its own.
 

Stack

Leave Women's Football Alone!!!
Joined
Sep 6, 2006
Messages
13,390
Location
Auckland New Zealand
you
Cracking response, fella :lol:

That post was an abomination in terms of grammar, clichés and the ridiculous inclusion of calling Holland the "flying Dutchmen", and frankly, sounded like something a shit pundit would say in the post-game analysis.
will escape newbie status in no time
 

alastair

ignorant
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,310
Location
The Champions League
I know this would probably be terrible in practice, but if a team is systematically fouling, I think the ref should be able to warn the captain that whoever commits the next foul, a yellow will be awarded. This might curb the worrying trend of tactical fouling that ruin the flow of games.
 

alastair

ignorant
Joined
Aug 6, 2010
Messages
16,310
Location
The Champions League
Well he didn't need to do that here since it was Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho. See Fletcher v Arsenal 2009.
I remember it well.

It's more a general point. It's killing free flowing football because players are not sufficiently punished for endless small fouls to break up the play. You need refs who have played the game because they understand what's going on.
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,962
I know this would probably be terrible in practice, but if a team is systematically fouling, I think the ref should be able to warn the captain that whoever commits the next foul, a yellow will be awarded. This might curb the worrying trend of tactical fouling that ruin the flow of games.
The principle of awarding an automatic yellow for the next foul doesn't sit quite right with me, because the next tackle might be something incredibly soft. That might lead to players putting pressure on the ref to keep giving yellows for soft tackles, by pointing to that and say "you gave a yellow for that, now this has to be a yellow". Something needs to be done though. If a player commits three fouls within ten minutes or some other arbitrary period of time, or seven fouls in a game, an automatic yellow is awarded, or something like that. That might give the fourth official something to do as well...
 

Sied

I..erm..love U2, baby?
Joined
Nov 28, 2013
Messages
10,358
I know this would probably be terrible in practice, but if a team is systematically fouling, I think the ref should be able to warn the captain that whoever commits the next foul, a yellow will be awarded. This might curb the worrying trend of tactical fouling that ruin the flow of games.
Just giving a yellow to those individuals who committed 3 or 4 cynical fouls, like the ref should have done, would have done the job. Not sure he could keep count though, as he was blowing his whistle so often.
 

Bob Loblaw

New Member
Joined
Feb 23, 2014
Messages
8,979
Supports
Liverpool
I seriously don't get why you're all slating the referee. He let the game flow and got all big decisions spot on.

Congrats Brazil, showed great spirit. Shame for Colombia, really like their team.
:lol:
 

DavidDeSchmikes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
17,384
Referee unfortunately was conned by too many players (Both Brazil and Columbia) falling down too easy.
Anyone see Oscar's Klinsmann-esque fall in injury time?

And as for Fred......my word, he did nothing apart from falling down accidently on purpose
 

didz

Full Member
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
1,963
I know this would probably be terrible in practice, but if a team is systematically fouling, I think the ref should be able to warn the captain that whoever commits the next foul, a yellow will be awarded. This might curb the worrying trend of tactical fouling that ruin the flow of games.
A much easier solution already exists in the game. Referees are allowed to book players for persistent fouling - it's just baffling that no-one seems to have told this guy.
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,962
A much easier solution already exists in the game. Referees are allowed to book players for persistent fouling - it's just baffling that no-one seems to have told this guy.
The problem is that persistent fouling is arbitrary and at the referee's discretion, like many other things in the laws of the game. If FIFA somehow were to come to a consensus on how many fouls are too many, then the ref's job would be made easier.

It's similar to the offside or handball rule. Those were much easier before, if a player was offside when the ball was played then it was called offside. None of this active, passive, interfering with the opponent, blocking line of sight, etc, bollocks. It seems that with every change made to the rules the referees are having to take more and more variables into consideration without getting any more help (and no, I'm not counting those goal-line refs) with their decision making. No wonder it's an impossible job.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
50,058
Location
W.Yorks
The thing I'm annoyed most about is that he gave poor James Rodriguez a fecking Yellow Card for a fairly tame slide-challenge, after the lad had been getting kicked up and down the field... I'd have been livid if that was me!

How Fernandinho didn't get booked... it'll forever be one of life's great mysteries.
 

peterstorey

Specialist In Failure
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
37,293
Location
'It's for the Arsenal and we're going to Wembley'
Referee unfortunately was conned by too many players (Both Brazil and Columbia) falling down too easy.
That just amplifies his utter shiteness: he gave daft dives as fouls all over the shop and didn't card dangerous/tactical fouls. There's no doubt in my mind that he was under heavy manners to leave out the cards.
 

DavidDeSchmikes

Full Member
Joined
Jan 20, 2013
Messages
17,384
The thing I'm annoyed most about is that he gave poor James Rodriguez a fecking Yellow Card for a fairly tame slide-challenge, after the lad had been getting kicked up and down the field... I'd have been livid if that was me!

How Fernandinho didn't get booked... it'll forever be one of life's great mysteries.
Bit like Van Bommel in the last World Cup
 

Thomas#7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 16, 2013
Messages
2,473
What the heck was that thing on Rodriguez's shoulder after he scored the penalty? :lol:
 

CantonaGiggs1

New Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2013
Messages
5,681
Regardless of what rival fans think he's a bloody good referee. A copper to boot.
The best in this world cup. The American ref(surprisingly) has also been good.

Howard Webb should have been refereeing in this game. Which game will he referee next?
 

labamba

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
34
Why was the tiago silva goal disallowed? (when he got the yellow card) he didn't touch that goalkeeper. it's a genuine question not a pro-brazil comment
 

Sixpence

Erroneously Promoted
Joined
Nov 30, 2012
Messages
15,231
Location
Offside
Why was the tiago silva goal disallowed? (when he got the yellow card) he didn't touch that goalkeeper. it's a genuine question not a pro-brazil comment
Because he blatantly obstructed the keeper from kicking it, it's a booking in anyone's language, even this referee :lol:
 

BlueCelery

New Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2011
Messages
2,224
Supports
Chelsea
Are people forgetting Webb's performance in the 2010 final? People only rate him because he refuses to make the tough decisions.
 

peterstorey

Specialist In Failure
Joined
Nov 16, 2002
Messages
37,293
Location
'It's for the Arsenal and we're going to Wembley'
Why was the tiago silva goal disallowed? (when he got the yellow card) he didn't touch that goalkeeper. it's a genuine question not a pro-brazil comment
You're not allowed to challenge the keeper when he's kicking out of his hands (ie he's deemed to be in control of the ball until he kicks it). It's a silly rule but Silva fouled him anyway.
 

labamba

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
34
oh ok, thanks! I for one thought this was a nice match. It's funny watching brazil being carried by its centre backs.
 

labamba

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 28, 2014
Messages
34
If you forget some harsh fouls the brazilian players seem nice lads... They got so much pressure on them too, you got to hand some credit to them