saivet
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 25,588
I've never been gutted when a team has won the World Cup (only experienced 3 lol) but I'll be gutted if Brazil win the thing. Dirty play, biased referees. Can't stand these cnuts.
Having seen the replay of the Yepes goal, I pretty much agree that at least most of the decisions were right. Still uncertain about whether James actually committed a foul for the Luiz goal. He pulls away from making any contact.I seriously don't get why you're all slating the referee. He let the game flow and got all big decisions spot on.
Congrats Brazil, showed great spirit. Shame for Colombia, really like their team.
He didn't 'let the game flow', quite the opposite. He let the Brazilians foul at will to disrupt any Columbian fluidity.I seriously don't get why you're all slating the referee. He let the game flow and got all big decisions spot on..
will escape newbie status in no timeCracking response, fella
That post was an abomination in terms of grammar, clichés and the ridiculous inclusion of calling Holland the "flying Dutchmen", and frankly, sounded like something a shit pundit would say in the post-game analysis.
With that username, no doubt.you
will escape newbie status in no time
I remember it well.Well he didn't need to do that here since it was Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho. See Fletcher v Arsenal 2009.
The principle of awarding an automatic yellow for the next foul doesn't sit quite right with me, because the next tackle might be something incredibly soft. That might lead to players putting pressure on the ref to keep giving yellows for soft tackles, by pointing to that and say "you gave a yellow for that, now this has to be a yellow". Something needs to be done though. If a player commits three fouls within ten minutes or some other arbitrary period of time, or seven fouls in a game, an automatic yellow is awarded, or something like that. That might give the fourth official something to do as well...I know this would probably be terrible in practice, but if a team is systematically fouling, I think the ref should be able to warn the captain that whoever commits the next foul, a yellow will be awarded. This might curb the worrying trend of tactical fouling that ruin the flow of games.
Just giving a yellow to those individuals who committed 3 or 4 cynical fouls, like the ref should have done, would have done the job. Not sure he could keep count though, as he was blowing his whistle so often.I know this would probably be terrible in practice, but if a team is systematically fouling, I think the ref should be able to warn the captain that whoever commits the next foul, a yellow will be awarded. This might curb the worrying trend of tactical fouling that ruin the flow of games.
I seriously don't get why you're all slating the referee. He let the game flow and got all big decisions spot on.
Congrats Brazil, showed great spirit. Shame for Colombia, really like their team.
Well he didn't need to do that here since it was Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho, Fernandinho. See Fletcher v Arsenal 2009.
A much easier solution already exists in the game. Referees are allowed to book players for persistent fouling - it's just baffling that no-one seems to have told this guy.I know this would probably be terrible in practice, but if a team is systematically fouling, I think the ref should be able to warn the captain that whoever commits the next foul, a yellow will be awarded. This might curb the worrying trend of tactical fouling that ruin the flow of games.
I thought that too,some terrible muller dive.I hope brazil get the dodgiest of all dodgy penalties in the last minute of the final and win.
I'd love to see the look on your bitter face then
The problem is that persistent fouling is arbitrary and at the referee's discretion, like many other things in the laws of the game. If FIFA somehow were to come to a consensus on how many fouls are too many, then the ref's job would be made easier.A much easier solution already exists in the game. Referees are allowed to book players for persistent fouling - it's just baffling that no-one seems to have told this guy.
That just amplifies his utter shiteness: he gave daft dives as fouls all over the shop and didn't card dangerous/tactical fouls. There's no doubt in my mind that he was under heavy manners to leave out the cards.Referee unfortunately was conned by too many players (Both Brazil and Columbia) falling down too easy.
Bit like Van Bommel in the last World CupThe thing I'm annoyed most about is that he gave poor James Rodriguez a fecking Yellow Card for a fairly tame slide-challenge, after the lad had been getting kicked up and down the field... I'd have been livid if that was me!
How Fernandinho didn't get booked... it'll forever be one of life's great mysteries.
The best in this world cup. The American ref(surprisingly) has also been good.Regardless of what rival fans think he's a bloody good referee. A copper to boot.
He refs like a copper -good at crowd control and poor at the other subtleties.Regardless of what rival fans think he's a bloody good referee. A copper to boot.
Good enough for me Pete.He refs like a copper -good at crowd control and poor at the other subtleties.
For blatantly running in front of him as he kicked it.Why was the tiago silva goal disallowed? (when he got the yellow card) he didn't touch that goalkeeper. it's a genuine question not a pro-brazil comment
Because he blatantly obstructed the keeper from kicking it, it's a booking in anyone's language, even this refereeWhy was the tiago silva goal disallowed? (when he got the yellow card) he didn't touch that goalkeeper. it's a genuine question not a pro-brazil comment
You're not allowed to challenge the keeper when he's kicking out of his hands (ie he's deemed to be in control of the ball until he kicks it). It's a silly rule but Silva fouled him anyway.Why was the tiago silva goal disallowed? (when he got the yellow card) he didn't touch that goalkeeper. it's a genuine question not a pro-brazil comment
No. I'm not a fan because he simply doesn't read the game but he probably made the right call in the context of a world cup final.Are people forgetting Webb's performance in the 2010 final? People only rate him because he refuses to make the tough decisions.