De Gea contract talk | Signs new deal

Status
Not open for further replies.

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,530
Location
left wing
OptaJoe‏@OptaJoe

14 - David de Gea has conceded 19 Premier League goals this season, but based on Opta xG data for the shots on target he's faced, the average goalkeeper would have been expected to concede 33 goals. This is the biggest differential by a PL goalkeeper in 2017-18. Exceptional.



Well worth it considering his age and longevity of keepers. He is brilliant, pity Rafa didn’t unearth him!!
Puts our defence roughly on par with Liverpool/Arsenal as the 6th/7th best, while De Gea is head and shoulders above any keeper in the league. Sounds about right.
 

Ban

New Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2015
Messages
26,022
Location
Zagreb, HR
That is not how that stat works.

DDG has obviously faced more than 33 shots this season. The expected value of goals from those shots (which takes into account shot difficulty) is 33. A gap of 14 speaks to DDG's brilliance, but it also speaks to how effective our defense is at not letting opportunities occur (not much apparently).

One can lie with statistics yes, but this isn't one of those cases.
We haven't been relying on DDG solely the whole season. There have been games where he had barely anything to do. So our defense hasn't been that bad as portrayed.
Obviously in last couple of games we've let lots of chances so it racked up.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,510
Location
Birmingham
Imagine Real actually signed him for 40m in 2015.
Worst deal of the century.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
That is not how that stat works.

DDG has obviously faced more than 33 shots this season. The expected value of goals from those shots (which takes into account shot difficulty) is 33. A gap of 14 speaks to DDG's brilliance, but it also speaks to how effective our defense is at not letting opportunities occur (not much apparently).

One can lie with statistics yes, but this isn't one of those cases.
City's defence is not letting the opposition have the ball, the amount of goals conceded by City would probably be in the single digits if you had De Gea in goal
 

ValenciaRocks

Full Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
236
I just hope Madrid go in for Courtois in the summer. If we sell De Gea then we must ask for at least 120 mil. He is that important to us.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
Balague;

Real Madrid found out that De Gea would cost about 100m euros, that’s the figure that was suggested to them by an intermediate linked to Manchester United. They said that was far too expensive, which was their way of cleaning their hands and saying ‘OK, if you are going to renew then renew’.

So De Gea is close to extending his contract with Manchester United and right now Real Madrid are not going to get in the way so it’s the second time they are missing out on him even though more than once it’s something he seriously considered.

:drool::drool::drool:
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,843
Location
Oslo, Norway
Balague;

Real Madrid found out that De Gea would cost about 100m euros, that’s the figure that was suggested to them by an intermediate linked to Manchester United. They said that was far too expensive, which was their way of cleaning their hands and saying ‘OK, if you are going to choose money then choose money’.
 

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,100
How sweet it is to live in an era where Madrid can't bully anyone financially. They are in for a looong rebuild
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,667
Balague;

Real Madrid found out that De Gea would cost about 100m euros, that’s the figure that was suggested to them by an intermediate linked to Manchester United. They said that was far too expensive, which was their way of cleaning their hands and saying ‘OK, if you are going to choose money then choose money’.
:lol::lol:
 

Inter Yer Nan

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
6,380
Location
Los Angeles, CA (from UK)
Balague;

Real Madrid found out that De Gea would cost about 100m euros, that’s the figure that was suggested to them by an intermediate linked to Manchester United. They said that was far too expensive, which was their way of cleaning their hands and saying ‘OK, if you are going to choose money then choose money’.
Wait. So he's suggesting we give De Gea for cheap since allowing Real Madrid to have our best player is more important to us than being adequately compensated? What a bizarre spin Ballbag puts on this.
 

AltiUn

likes playing with swords after fantasies
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
23,753
Balague;

Real Madrid found out that De Gea would cost about 100m euros, that’s the figure that was suggested to them by an intermediate linked to Manchester United. They said that was far too expensive, which was their way of cleaning their hands and saying ‘OK, if you are going to choose money then choose money’.
Wonder if Ballague has any other analysis/theories about why players might like playing for United, anything beyond 'money' seems to be well beyond his comprehension. Regarding DDG, it's not as if he may still harbour some feelings that Madrid intentionally botched his transfer the last time around in order to get him for free the following season, highlighting to DDG that Madrid may no really value him that highly to begin with, it's categorically 100% about money that he might be renewing with United.
 

el3mel

New Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,736
Location
Egypt
Balague;

Real Madrid found out that De Gea would cost about 100m euros, that’s the figure that was suggested to them by an intermediate linked to Manchester United. They said that was far too expensive, which was their way of cleaning their hands and saying ‘OK, if you are going to choose money then choose money’.
Madrid or money.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,742
Location
The Mathews Bridge
Balague;

Real Madrid found out that De Gea would cost about 100m euros, that’s the figure that was suggested to them by an intermediate linked to Manchester United. They said that was far too expensive, which was their way of cleaning their hands and saying ‘OK, if you are going to choose money then choose money’.
They read like spoof quotes that someone on the Caf would make up as a jibe about Balague being a broken record.
 

Yagami

Good post resistant
Joined
Jan 27, 2013
Messages
13,721
Perez bully's other clubs when there's good enough reason to do so.

Only a retard would pay 100 mil € for a keeper who will be 28 before the end of the year while there's cheaper and younger options available on the market.
So eloquent.
 

Nicklas

Full Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2014
Messages
611
Perez bully's other clubs when there's good enough reason to do so.

Only a retard would pay 100 mil € for a keeper who will be 28 before the end of the year while there's cheaper and younger options available on the market.
:lol:

That would be a bargain for a keeper of De Geas talent, especially as he’s hitting his prime years as well.
 

anant

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
8,262
Balague;

Real Madrid found out that De Gea would cost about 100m euros, that’s the figure that was suggested to them by an intermediate linked to Manchester United. They said that was far too expensive, which was their way of cleaning their hands and saying ‘OK, if you are going to choose money then choose money’.
People do realise that this is a fake quote, right?
The responses seem as if people are taking this to be an actual quote from Ballague
 

Pass and Move

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
810
Haha, talk about trying to twist facts to suit your arguement.

Only a retard would pay 100 mil € for a keeper who will be 28 before the end of the year while there's cheaper and younger options available on the market.
By the end of the year? It's February. De Gea is worth more than any other keeper in the world, age included.
 

Trizy

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
12,009
Perez bully's other clubs when there's good enough reason to do so.

Only a retard would pay 100 mil € for a keeper who will be 28 before the end of the year while there's cheaper and younger options available on the market.
Are you the ''do you want your jaw snapped'' guy from twitter?:lol:
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
People do realise that this is a fake quote, right?
The responses seem as if people are taking this to be an actual quote from Ballague
Indeed he's taken the actual quote I posted and edited it
 

gaucho_10

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
2,219
:lol:

That would be a bargain for a keeper of De Geas talent, especially as he’s hitting his prime years as well.
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Lack of results and awful football that has been on display for years is making some of you completely lose connection with reality. Posts like Isco + money just confirm what I'm saying.

There's no universe in which De Gea (a goalkeeper) is more valuable then Isco (a midfielder/playmaker whose signing could potentially change the face of the whole football team).

De Gea is your most valuable asset and the club with that kind of financial muscle will do whatever it takes to keep him. You'll offer to make him the highest paid goal keeper in history (which is fine, because the guy is really great) and you will also put abnormal price on the player to fend off Real Madrid (again completely reasonable and the right thing to do) but my point stands. Isco + any amount of money, Kovacic + 75/100 mil € = that's all mental stuff. No other word for it.
 

Fridge chutney

Do your best.
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
9,003
Only a retard would pay 100 mil € for a keeper who will be 28 before the end of the year while there's cheaper and younger options available on the market.
Think before you write nonsense.

We are talking about the best keeper in the world and a cost that could be amortized over 7-12 years. This is not unreasonable.
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,815
Location
Hollywood CA
Perez bully's other clubs when there's good enough reason to do so.

Only a retard would pay 100 mil € for a keeper who will be 28 before the end of the year while there's cheaper and younger options available on the market.
We don't allow terms like retard here.
 

gaucho_10

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
2,219
Think before you write nonsense.

We are talking about the best keeper in the world and a cost that could be amortized over 7-12 years. This is not unreasonable.
Player prices will not be going up any more because the TV balloon will start deflating when the new deal kicks in. That makes me think players prices in general will stay as they are for now and eventually start going down (I might be wrong of course).

Courtois is 2,5 years younger, he would be attainable for 1/3 of the money needed to sign De Gea, the whole process would be much easier to complete for the club and we would end up with a great goal keeper. Maybe not as good, but definitely good enough. Going for De Gea when Courtois is available is what I call nonsense.



@Raoul: sorry, won't happen again
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,815
Location
Hollywood CA
Player prices will not be going up any more because the TV balloon will start deflating when the new deal kicks in. That makes me think players prices in general will stay as they are for now and eventually start going down (I might be wrong of course).

Courtois is 2,5 years younger, he would be attainable for 1/3 of the money needed to sign De Gea, the whole process would be much easier to complete for the club and we would end up with a great goal keeper. Maybe not as good, but definitely good enough. Going for De Gea when Courtois is available is what I call nonsense.



@Raoul: sorry, won't happen again
No worries. Some people don't know that terms like retard, cancer, and spastic are no longer allowed. I'll delete the post.
 

Fridge chutney

Do your best.
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
9,003
Player prices will not be going up any more because the TV balloon will start deflating when the new deal kicks in. That makes me think players prices in general will stay as they are for now and eventually start going down (I might be wrong of course).

Courtois is 2,5 years younger, he would be attainable for 1/3 of the money needed to sign De Gea, the whole process would be much easier to complete for the club and we would end up with a great goal keeper. Maybe not as good, but definitely good enough. Going for De Gea when Courtois is available is what I call nonsense.



@Raoul: sorry, won't happen again
I disagree that the new TV deals will solely contribute to deflationary pressure on transfer fees (although I hope you are correct), because the source of inflation is not just TV revenue, it is also an influx of sponsorship dollars (and other related revenue streams) and oil/oligarch money (PSG and City, and China). Stem the latter, which operates without a cap and with no basis in economic reality, and I believe transfer prices will stagnate or deflate.
 

Nicklas

Full Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2014
Messages
611
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Lack of results and awful football that has been on display for years is making some of you completely lose connection with reality. Posts like Isco + money just confirm what I'm saying.

There's no universe in which De Gea (a goalkeeper) is more valuable then Isco (a midfielder/playmaker whose signing could potentially change the face of the whole football team).

De Gea is your most valuable asset and the club with that kind of financial muscle will do whatever it takes to keep him. You'll offer to make him the highest paid goal keeper in history (which is fine, because the guy is really great) and you will also put abnormal price on the player to fend off Real Madrid (again completely reasonable and the right thing to do) but my point stands. Isco + any amount of money, Kovacic + 75/100 mil € = that's all mental stuff. No other word for it.
Allright, that's your opinion - fair enough. I just hope that Perez feels the same as you when it comes to this.
 

Pass and Move

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
810
There's no universe in which De Gea (a goalkeeper) is more valuable then Isco (a midfielder/playmaker whose signing could potentially change the face of the whole football team).

De Gea is your most valuable asset and the club with that kind of financial muscle will do whatever it takes to keep him. You'll offer to make him the highest paid goal keeper in history (which is fine, because the guy is really great) and you will also put abnormal price on the player to fend off Real Madrid (again completely reasonable and the right thing to do) but my point stands. Isco + any amount of money, Kovacic + 75/100 mil € = that's all mental stuff. No other word for it.
De Gea is more valuable than Isco. He will earn more points for a team relative to other keepers than Isco would to other attacking midfielders. There are a number of midfielders who would contribute as much to a team as Isco, but no other keeper would contribute as much as De Gea.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Development as expected.
What should really hurt Madrid isn't David wanting to stay but also signing a new contract.
There seems to be a different excuse every summer. Zidane trusts Navas, we decided not to activate a clause, we decided to walk away from a 100m valuation.
Its no surprise to me that the two pieces of news came out simultaneously. Just like how we decided to back away from Griezmann
 

TheReligion

Abusive
Joined
Nov 22, 2006
Messages
51,606
Location
Manchester
I've said it before and I'll say it again. Lack of results and awful football that has been on display for years is making some of you completely lose connection with reality. Posts like Isco + money just confirm what I'm saying.

There's no universe in which De Gea (a goalkeeper) is more valuable then Isco (a midfielder/playmaker whose signing could potentially change the face of the whole football team).

De Gea is your most valuable asset and the club with that kind of financial muscle will do whatever it takes to keep him. You'll offer to make him the highest paid goal keeper in history (which is fine, because the guy is really great) and you will also put abnormal price on the player to fend off Real Madrid (again completely reasonable and the right thing to do) but my point stands. Isco + any amount of money, Kovacic + 75/100 mil € = that's all mental stuff. No other word for it.
You're valuations are bizarre.

28 is young for a keeper when they are still going at 38.
 

gaucho_10

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
2,219
I disagree that the new TV deals will solely contribute to deflationary pressure on transfer fees (although I hope you are correct), because the source of inflation is not just TV revenue, it is also an influx of sponsorship dollars (and other related revenue streams) and oil/oligarch money (PSG and City, and China). Stem the latter, which operates without a cap and with no basis in economic reality, and I believe transfer prices will stagnate or deflate.
You're right, but I also think that sponsorship money will not follow if TV revenue will go down. There has to be some connection between the two. PSG and City need to be dealt with by UEFA and I think it will eventually happen.




De Gea is more valuable than Isco. He will earn more points for a team relative to other keepers than Isco would to other attacking midfielders. There are a number of midfielders who would contribute as much to a team as Isco, but no other keeper would contribute as much as De Gea.
We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one because in my mind no goalkeeper no matter how good can even come close to the influence of a top midfielder who's playing at the heart of the team. It's not about De Gea and Isco, it's about a goalkeeper and a midfielder influence. No comparison for me.




You're valuations are bizarre.

28 is young for a keeper when they are still going at 38.
The only thing bizarre is your valuation of 38 year old goalkeepers that are "still going". I don't know what football fan in the world would want to have a 38 year old between the posts if his name was anything but Van der Saar.

Cech is still going at 35 and he sucks. Casillas is still going at 36 and he sucks for years. Buffon is also still going at 40 and he's been a horror show for few years now with everyone turning the blind eye because he's Buffon. By the time they get to 32 most of them are not good enough any more.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
Puts our defence roughly on par with Liverpool/Arsenal as the 6th/7th best, while De Gea is head and shoulders above any keeper in the league. Sounds about right.
I’m sure the xG for those teams would be about 40. So we would still be better than them
 

Giggs86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,632
Location
USA
Give him the armband and let him have a say in which defenders he wants playing in front of him. Make him a board member for all I care, just keep him here at all costs.

we'd probably be comfortably sitting at seventh place without him and out of the CL by now.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,510
Location
Birmingham
I actually see @gaucho_10 point. Valuations are relative.
Dave is worth £100m to us but probably isn't with that to Madrid.
Dave probably doesn't improve Real enough to spend that kind of money.
 

RMD83

Full Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2016
Messages
827
There is not a single signing in world football that would bring me more joy than if Madrid signed Courtois in the summer.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,530
Location
left wing
Development as expected.
What should really hurt Madrid isn't David wanting to stay but also signing a new contract.
There seems to be a different excuse every summer. Zidane trusts Navas, we decided not to activate a clause, we decided to walk away from a 100m valuation.
Its no surprise to me that the two pieces of news came out simultaneously. Just like how we decided to back away from Griezmann
I genuinely thought this might finally be the summer (Madrid about to embark on their 1st spending spree in a while). If he extends his deal, that is massive for us. Make him captain.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.