Theon
Lord of the Iron Islands
- Joined
- Oct 14, 2011
- Messages
- 13,289
Just got back in and not had time to read this yet, but the two formation pictures really annoy me! Just put their names ffs
Maldini won't be attacking gung ho but he will contribute to my attacking unit. It might only be 4-5 times in a game, its just to get the point across that you can't assume he'll be sitting back all game.So when Maldini attacks Breitner is covering him? Awesome! I'd much rather Maldini attacked and Breitner dealt with Garrincha.
"Classy on the ball"? Maldini is, but the rest of your defenders are actually no better than O'Shea at picking a pass. As good as Desailly for that matter. Everyone else in my side is as good or a fair bit better than Maldini.
The worst passer on the pitch is Mauro Silva, by a distance. Breitner is fine though, as said.
Why do you also assume he will let himself be dragged around? He is not man-marking Iniesta. His job is to guard the area just ahead of the space between Hierro and Enrique. The main objective is to stop Iniesta breaking in there, if Iniesta goes way out wide on the line he is now Luis Enrique's job and Zanetti will only concern himself with him if Lucho gets beaten. Players don't run around everywhere on the pitch chasing people like complete morons, they know what duties they have been assigned and know what constitutes danger and what doesn't. Iniesta breaking into the box and receiving is danger, going out wide isn't.While Zanetti is in a good area to keep close to him he will be dragged all over the pitch which is where if at any time Messi drops in the pocket left by Zanetti, any move created by Andres will be very dangerous.
But he is attacking Luis Enrique down the flank and leaving Breitner covering (he now has a new job apparently, no longer engaged in midfield battle with Schuster). He is no Vogts, Garrincha would rape him.Garrincha vs Maldini is a lot tougher, ideally you would say that Garrincha would score but against Maldini who has made a career of successfully reading and stopping counters and has the pace and stamina for it, it can be a bit of an even contest there. Surely Paolo is up to that job.
I touched on this in my last game and I thought it was clear from my pitch. He is totally unpredictable and impossible to dictate tactical instructions to. Just pure unbridled fantasy. You may give him the ball and see him run at the defence and destroy him or you may see him faff around and letting others track back. You just don't know with him, which is why in the last game I said "for the quick counter go for Joya or Eusebio, if that's not on or if the defence needs a breather go Garrincha". The breather element can be quite important when you bring so much heat on yourself.Is Garrincha the best player in a counter attacking setup though? Not questioning his playing attributes but his mentality, is he bound to get frustrated after not seeing the ball for a long time or will he be ready to pounce on anything without having a sulk? From his footage you seem to get the impression he played in sides that had most of the ball and fed him continuously.
No, you don't, except when you claim you have the exact same counter scenario when recovering the ball from me. You don't. It's not game-changing but you are claiming something which is false on two counts: 1. I have more cover, 2. you can't execute a quick transition the way I canThe counter attack won't be a major part of the side as they'll be on the front foot for long periods. The passing will generally be short and quick, and everyone is comfortable in possession. I don't need anyone with Hierros range of passing to play how this team will be.
I had trouble with Luis Enrique and Carlos Alberto for my first game, the length of the name forced me to play his shirt almost where Zanetti is .Just got back in and not had time to read this yet, but the two formation pictures really annoy me! Just put their names ffs
Don't remember that but I wouldn't be surprised. I'm not that worried about gimmicks but I don't like it when youtube videos are the sole basis to make your case. I post some every now and then when I feel something is being completely overlooked, but they can be overkill.It's not a major issue at all, but it annoys me more than it should Just one of those things, like when you got annoyed at my youtube videos!
Seems a bit gimmicky to me
If you have read my write ups it's quite blatant that they aren't the sole basis of making a case. So not sure what you are on about there.Don't remember that but I wouldn't be surprised. I'm not that worried about gimmicks but I don't like it when youtube videos are the sole basis to make your case. I post some every now and then when I feel something is being completely overlooked, but they can be overkill.
Aldo, I now the monumental man crush you have with Iniesta. Won't try to talk you out of it as it is pointless, you just want to go with Messi-Iniesta despite continuous real life proof that they can be stopped even in their favoured setup, in a better side than Cutch's (bar a couple of defenders), and while facing far inferior sides to the one I have fielded.Not all across the pitch actually, but just in the area where Zanetti is supposed to guard, Iniesta can perform his small movements which he often does without letting the defender touch the ball which in turn forces someone to leave his guard and then is when Iniesta makes the pass. I think he's in his comfort zone letting Zanetti chase him, even in the 10 yard area Zanetti is and then coming up with a move in tandem with Messi.
Why would Schuster take positions to start counters when we don't have the ball? He's onto him alright. I'm not hugely worried about Rivera though, he really doesn't have a lot to target ahead of him. It's really only three players under heavy marking. I even thought about Eusebio being asked to get a bit more stuck in but it didn't make sense to tie him up at all.Rivera seems to have a bit of space to work doesn't he? Schuster would inevitably take positions from where he can start counters so he won't really stay close to Rivera the whole time,add to that Rivera usually roamed in midfield so I think his playmaking is going to work.
Not much, exactly. That's why it is him and not Zanetti out wide. Lucho is tasked with Maldini if he comes forward or Iniesta if he comes out wide to avoid Zanetti. Cutch insists Maldini will attack though. He has, it's not me making it up and you should consider that. If he is not attacking at all then the reality is both Zanetti and Lucho end up on Iniesta most of the time. Of course, Iniesta will murder them too in your opinion but Garrincha is fecked vs. Maldini. Right...What is Luis Enrique doing though while defending? Cannot see Iniesta ever going to that part of the pitch, that is Jordi Alba's territory if you look at the current setup, Maldini won't attack that much at all specially since he has to look at Garrincha.
See above. Garrincha will see more than enough of the ball, particularly if Maldini attacks. He is an obvious outball in that scenario. He just needs to beat one man and he is through on goal. I wouldn't worry about him lacking directness then but when he has to beat Maldini AND Nesta after him.I don't think Paolo will get raped here, his awareness is top notch and his early tackles before the ball reaches dangerous territory can put Garrincha off his game specially when Garrincha won't get a lot of the ball.
He sure looks deadly. Maybe because he is in his element, well partnered, well serviced and the man meant to stop him can't keep up, and after that is Roberto Ayala having to stop the oncoming traffic looking like a rabbit in headlights.Eusebio really looks a lot more threatening to me.
No Theon, I didn't say anything about you not elaborating.If you have read my write ups it's quite blatant that they aren't the sole basis of making a case. So not sure what you are on about there.
Ayee not saying you're worried about gimmicks, don't think anyone is worried about anything in a draft game tbh. It just looks stupid.
Wouldn't in any real game Ayala stay on a similar height to Suurbier and Nesta and you'd face a well working offside trap with these players that nullifies your counter attack almost completely? A long with the pressure on your players when they get the ball, which makes it very hard to pingpoint perfect passes and will end in quite a lot interceptions, it's a completely different situation than what you describe. Sure you get through a few times and most likely will score, but I'm not sure that's enough. Giving so much possession to Cutch with Iniesta roaming around, Messi dropping deep, Kalle running inside and Rivera most likely able to escape Schuster a few times is a very dangerous game.
What defences have they faced of a similar standard? It's also unfair to think about Messi scoring for fun against Almería or similar dross. On that basis then I can bring up Eusebio's 2 goals per game record!It is unfair to look at the games where they were stopped, that way Maradona was also stopped by Gentile, Cruyff was stopped by Vogts and what not. I understand you have gone for a park the bus job which has proven difficult but in the overall picture I am considering both being at their best in terms of passing, movement and link up. Same for Eusebio, or else should I say he couldn't beat Stepney in a 1v1 that could have won the European Cup?
I followed what Cutch's instruction was: high line with Ayala staying back as a last man. Ask him why.Wouldn't in any real game Ayala stay on a similar height to Suurbier and Nesta and you'd face a well working offside trap with these players that nullifies your counter attack almost completely?
I'm banking on Hierro, Schuster and Junior to have the composure to play those passes. They have plenty of options between those three and the wingbacks, surely at least one of them will be on most of the time. It's not like I'm trying to thread a ball through a needle. Plenty of space, plenty of options and all of them faster than their markers. They have a much easier job getting those balls ut than Rivera, now he would get a lot of balls intercepted.A long with the pressure on your players when they get the ball, which makes it very hard to pingpoint perfect passes and will end in quite a lot interceptions, it's a completely different situation than what you describe. Sure you get through a few times and most likely will score, but I'm not sure that's enough. Giving so much possession to Cutch with Iniesta roaming around, Messi dropping deep, Kalle running inside and Rivera most likely able to escape Schuster a few times is a very dangerous game.
He corrected it later. He had indeed said Breitner was in a midfield battle and Maldini was attacking. Had also listed six players who would all be attacking Zanetti's zone earlier, thus overpowering hi. That was quite funny.Also I highly doubt, Maldini and Breitner will move forward at the same time. Just because Maldini will find a few spots to make a run during the game, doesn't mean he will run forward like a headless chicken and be part of the attack every single time. I don't think Cutch ever said that.
Junior would be on Kalle there anyway seeing as I had drifted him in to acknowledge the Breitner threat, but he is now a left back covering for a better left back going on attacking runs, which he is better at. Really don't get that at all.It's quite dangerous for Faccetti to go instantly on a run forward the moment your team gets the ball as well with the pressure Cutch wants to apply on your players. If your first pass gets intercepted and it will, you're in massive trouble, when Facchetti is caught out of position.
Cutch did say that. I'll look it up for you. He si quite non-committal though. Gave little if no insight into his instructions and I have spent all game trying to extract them off him. He knows it is much easier to coast through a game letting people assume what they think would be best is what he is doing.I still have no clue who to vote for, just thought that picture is really stupid because in no way would a back 4 of these players ever be dragged all over the pitch like that and Cutch said nothing that gives that impression.
As great an all-around footballer as Luis Enrique was I'm having no problem imagining Iniesta turning him inside out several times in this match, or finding him so far out of position that he doesn't have to. Zanetti comes out to cover, either Rivera or Breitner is free for an easy short pass, Messi gets the ball either to feet or into space and does what Messi does.Why do you also assume he will let himself be dragged around? He is not man-marking Iniesta. His job is to guard the area just ahead of the space between Hierro and Enrique. The main objective is to stop Iniesta breaking in there, if Iniesta goes way out wide on the line he is now Luis Enrique's job and Zanetti will only concern himself with him if Lucho gets beaten. Players don't run around everywhere on the pitch chasing people like complete morons, they know what duties they have been assigned and know what constitutes danger and what doesn't. Iniesta breaking into the box and receiving is danger, going out wide isn't.
Of course they have. I basically listed 5 CL seasons at their business ends and there are cases when they quite clearly did the business.They had decisions against them in the first leg against Chelsea n 09, it is quite pointless to bring that up.
They also never had a Maldini and Nesta protecting them.
We are judging players at their peak and Messi and Iniesta have done more than outplaying Almeria to be very honest.
Quite agree with all this.As great an all-around footballer as Luis Enrique was I'm having no problem imagining Iniesta turning him inside out several times in this match, or finding him so far out of position that he doesn't have to. Zanetti comes out to cover, either Rivera or Breitner is free for an easy short pass, Messi gets the ball either to feet or into space and does what Messi does.
Going to have to go with Cutch here. He has the better individual quality imo and has certainly held his own in the tactical debate.
The idea of voting against Anto makes me feel bad as his energy basically makes these drafts what they are, but although his tactical set up has been excellent to read Cutch deserves this for me.
It was a one off when it happened. The Inter result is the only one where they were actually done for, and it was because they conceded thrice thanks to some shocking defending which won't happen here. Chelsea in 09 was a joke but Barca will still the better team. Iniesta scored and Messi assisted, the players involved in this game.Of course they have. I basically listed 5 CL seasons at their business ends and there are cases when they quite clearly did the business.
There are also others when they didn't or were incredibly close not to. Should we just ignore that and just focus only on the games were everythign went well for them? That doesn't sound fair either.
I acknowledged those two defenders being better than what Barca had, why not recognise I'm aware of the point rather than counterargue it?
Their rivals never played against Garrincha or Eusebio either.
Pat, that's why he is out wide and Zanetti inside. Cutch spent the entire first few hours banging on about how I got that wrong when it clearly isn't the case. I would be far more exposed if they were the other way around.As great an all-around footballer as Luis Enrique was I'm having no problem imagining Iniesta turning him inside out several times in this match, or finding him so far out of position that he doesn't have to. Zanetti comes out to cover, either Rivera or Breitner is free for an easy short pass, Messi gets the ball either to feet or into space and does what Messi does.
Of course I'm not. It's Cutch that just chucked the names on the teamsheet and sent them out to spend the entire half completely baffled that they had prepared for a different game.They've reached CL semis 6 odd years in a row without breaking a sweat. If you are telling your players that they can easily stop them just on the back of an upset then that is bad management and can cost you the game.
Why do you ignore the manager instructing Maldini to attack and Breitner to mark Garrincha? I really don't get it. He has put it in black and white.Maldini vs Garrincha will be even in your setup. Eusebio's scoring, never questioned it.
Theres no need at all to play deep if you're looking to regularly get Eusebio to drop deep to collect. This side will look to press you as much as possible in your own half. Nesta will be generally briefed to watch Eusebio but when he does drop he's coming straight into Mauro Silva territory. Theres no worries about a lack of pace in my back line. Suurbier and Nesta have pace to burn, Maldini also pretty quick. Its only really Ayala but he makes up for it in his reading, he'll generally be the covering defender in this one.
Are you saying you are playing a high line? If it isn't Eusebio doesn't ALWAYS drop deep, he can pretty much position and wait for the ball to be played to him anywhere he wants it. If you are playing a high line you have no idea the supernatural pace you are facing. It's not me saying supernatural, watch the clip above and it will get mentioned 3-4 times in reference to the Black Panther.
Joya and Facchetti will not be far from that, mind.
Balu, you may be right that Ayala should also be high up. I guess I misread the covering defender bit (Argentina did that a lot though because Ayala simply doesn't have the pace for a high line, he was usually the "defensa escalonado", i.e. the one further back to cover the more advanced CB is beaten).I'd be playing a fairly high line yes. I want this game to be played in your half which you are seemingly happy for me to do. The further away from my goal that you are the better. I have 2 of the all time greats in my back 4 and Ayala who's also fantastic at controlling a back line, with the destroyer Mauro Silva infront. They've got this shit under control.
He has changed his tune so many times I've stopped bothering with working it out. It's pointless. Read what you would rather read, as everyone seems to do.I think Cutch said it would not be more than 4-5 times no? It is not like Garrincha is standing alone for 90 minutes on the flank.
Your off chance to make that happen would be finding Maldini completely committed in attack and also finding a pass to Garrincha at the same time, it could happen but has a very less probability..
Balu, you may be right that Ayala should also be high up. I guess I misread the covering defender bit (Argentina did that a lot though because Ayala simply doesn't have the pace for a high line, he was usually the "defensa escalonado", i.e. the one further back to cover the more advanced CB is beaten).
All the better if Ayala is also high up. I'll murder that backline via ball over the top, or is Harry Gregg also a modern sweeper keeper?
He does seem flipping flopping over it yeah.He has changed his tune so many times I've stopped bothering with working it out. It's pointless. Read what you would rather read, as everyone seems to do.
Facchetti and Joya would murder Suurbier. He already did it in the last game and kept Gio in it despite being his singular route to goal.I think the Facchetti pick might just cost you the game. I know why you picked him and can see him influencing the game but attacking threat from wingbacks has never been appreciated fully and never will be. That is the very reason formations with 3 at the back never get votes.
Yeah as I said I really respect the way you have gone here. The tactics are very effective and I would have actually voted for Cutch by now if you had just gone for fancy names ignoring everything.Facchetti and Joya would murder Suurbier. He already did it in the last game and kept Gio in it despite being his singular route to goal.
Too much fancy pansy name shit here, that's all. I'd rather go with a team that would win than pick Redondo so that everyone goes "wow, awesome midfielder" despite the side being severley weakened by comparison.
I was a dead man walking the moment the draw was done. I don't mind going out with a team that I know would win. Much better than picking some big names that will get votes but not improve the sides. Cutch said I should have got Giggs. He is not worse than Joya, but no real improvement either. It's just a marketing move, don't give a flying feck about those.
If his entire defence is so high up and everyone is staying back then Eusebio will be on the shoulder.
Only Ayala's pace seems to be an issue for me there which he makes up with his reading of the game.
More importantly you have Eusebio who is not playing on the shoulder of Ayala or Nesta but a lot deeper as he usually did which is why he is against Silva. Who are you aiming the high balls at?
Not quite sure that's the best way to use him. I'd rather have him drop in spaces between the CBs and Silva which was what I was thinking so far and he'll be more effective from there IMO.If his entire defence is so high up and everyone is staying back then Eusebio will be on the shoulder.
5 attacking 7 yes but a couple of those are good enough to warrant being double marked. Plus on your instructions Facchetti is going forward a lot so it could be 5v6 at times with the front 3 all great in any 1v1.If his entire defence is so high up and everyone is staying back then Eusebio will be on the shoulder.
You do realise though that if those conditions are met then he has five people attacking seven? And they are meant to succeed and also be immensely successful at pressing them into a bad pass.
It's far easier not to commit what people are doing and let everyone optimistically imagine 10 supermen, clearly.
Which was the idea from the outset but at this stage I frankly have no idea where Cutch's defenders are supposed to be. They are putting out fires everywhere and generally being awesome at closing out an entire half of the pitch despite facing pacier counter specialists serviced by excellent ball distributors.Not quite sure that's the best way to use him. I'd rather have him drop in spaces between the CBs and Silva which was what I was thinking so far and he'll be more effective from there IMO.
He is never ging to move the ball around quickly enough for Facchetti not to be back. I said the passing range from his defeders wasn't critical, but it sure as feck makes his build up slower. Rivera is very closely guarded as well, Facchetti has loads of time to get back.5 attacking 7 yes but a couple of those are good enough to warrant being double marked. Plus on your instructions Facchetti is going forward a lot so it could be 5v6 at times with the front 3 all great in any 1v1.
That's quite a good point. It was surely a curveball!He is never ging to move the ball around quickly enough for Facchetti not to be back. I said the passing range from his defeders wasn't critical, but it sure as feck makes his build up slower. Rivera is very closely guarded as well, Facchetti has loads of time to get back.
I have absolutely ZERO concern about his right flank, ZERO concern about out wide on the left and the only part of the pitch was worried about was the one-two and slipping a ball in between CB and RB. On the back of that, despite Zanetti being there and a core three of Hierro-Desailly and Cech I seem to be conceding more than him.
That with the entire team having no clue what they are supposed to be doing and having prepared for a different game. The manager himself asked for time to work it out.
Nuts.