Did Wayne Rooney fulfil his potential?

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
I think if Rooney had the same drive and commitment in his career that Ronaldo has shown he would have beaten Shearer's PL record.
shearer was a striker for 18 years. Whereas Rooney was flexible enough to play LW, CM, AM, SS, CF etc. I dont think it was a question of drive or committment but the fact that Shearer was a more pure forward than Rooney was. So was Lineker.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
66,756
Location
France
shearer was a striker for 18 years. Whereas Rooney was flexible enough to play LW, CM, AM, SS, CF etc. I dont think it was a question of drive or committment but the fact that Shearer was a more pure forward than Rooney was. So was Lineker.
He played most of his career in a 442 as one of the strikers and a second striker is a striker. People exaggerate with the positions Rooney played.
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,479
Was Wayne Rooney one of the greatest talents Britain has ever had? Was he in terms of potential as good as Charlton, Best, Law... Gascoigne?

In terms of technical ability, I don't think he was the best footballer we have produced in terms of talent from these shores, but what Wayne had that put him in the very top tier of British talents was this ferocious enthusiasm for the game, a blend of raw brute strength, electric pace, direct dribbling, vicious shooting ability, play-making ability and a brilliant sense of timing, when he burst onto the scene.. he seemed a man destined to star on the biggest of stages. A man-child who shone on the starriest of stages - make no bones about it, out of the group of Messi, Ronaldo, Rooney, Robben (all breaking through at the same time), if there was one of that quartet who you think would naturally be the 'Iniesta' of the big games, or the first to develop into a big household name it would have been Rooney. The way he burst on to the scene, the aggression and directness he demonstrated for example in that match v France in Euro 2004.


A guy with that level of natural talent, could and should have harnessed that talent into Ballon D'or winning level performances. I don't think he had it in him to win successive Ballon D'ors, or become a better player than Messi or Ronaldo.. I think even a maxed out Rooney would still due to his body type, have slowed down and not had a long career at his peak even if he lived like a monk. He in many ways reminded me of a Kaka, a physical force of nature with some brilliant technical attributes and a good footballing brain, who could have been one of the leading players in the world, or the BPITW for a season or two before fading away.

The real letdown with Wayne, is that his peak.. never actually came. The 09/10 peak, where he became a number 9.. it was good don't get me wrong, but it wasn't the peak any of us envisaged. The Rooney we saw as a kid wasn't destined to have one or two seasons trying to imitate Alan Shearer, he was meant to have seasons where his goalscoring and his playmaking both hit superstar levels at the same time, like Messi has done season after season. He was meant to be a Gascoigne and Shearer combined for 2-3 seasons.. but injury, lack of attention to fitness, meant his flame didn't burn as bright as it should have done.

Top scorer for England and United, is that what we all expected and has he delivered? well it is what we expected but we didn't expect him to get to it in the manner he has. TBH he has done it in an undeserved way, forcing himself on various managers and staying long beyond what his form merited. Rooney should not have been at United since 2014, he should not have even been starting for England in World Cup 2014.. so the truth of the matter is, had he been treated on merit.. he would be nowhere near the records. Now that he has the records, well done to him.. regardless of how he has got there, he's done it, so that is great but for people to use it as a way of saying he lived up to his potential.. no. If anything the fact he got the records, despite never reaching the level he should have demonstrates what a truly special player he is or was.

When I look at his contempories, guys like Torres, David Villa, Drogba, Eto'o.. these days Lewandowski, Aguero, Zlatan, Luis Suarez.. Rooney had the potential to leave some of these guys in the dust. His aggression, his pace, his all-round game.. I remember there was once a time when he was acknowledged to be comfortably better than a Luis Suarez. Now if you said that, people wouid laugh at you. He was a phenomenon but people forget that.

To summarise, a great player who had the potential to be an all time british legend, but due to exceptionally bad luck with injuries, and his many failings as a man won't be remembered as a better player than the likes of Charlton, Best or as fondly as a Gascoigne. Even if we had 2-3 years of prime, peak Rooney from 23-26 and he then faded into obscurity.. that would have been enough to see him at his best.. but the truth is, injuries robbed us of his true peak and he never really had the discipline to really get himself back into top top physical condition and thus we were left with a good, great but not a legendary version of Rooney for majority of his career.
 

dellboyy

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
927
Location
Manchester
When he was young, he got all the 'next big thing' press like they all do, but that's usually just press hysteria that should be ignored for more realistic goals.

For me i think he's suffered from two things. Not being alongside people like Ronaldo/Messi (very few players are), and never having the fans totally behind him from the times he's almost done a runner. He'll never be loved as a united great for example.

However, the guys record speaks for itself. He's scored consistently at every level for club and country, whilst playing in a variety of positions, and also breaking records.

So it depends what his 'potential' means... he'll always be a step beneath the top in terms of natural skill/ability. However when we bought him, if it was said he'd be with us for this long, with his appearance/goals record and also breaking Charltons record (assuming of course he gets another goal), would you have said that was a let down?

United fan or not, once he retires, he'll be remembered as one of the all time most successful English strikers, backed up by both his scoring records, and medals won.
 

Ixion

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
15,275
shearer was a striker for 18 years. Whereas Rooney was flexible enough to play LW, CM, AM, SS, CF etc. I dont think it was a question of drive or committment but the fact that Shearer was a more pure forward than Rooney was. So was Lineker.
He has 1 Premier League goal this season, 8 last season, 12 the season before...

These should have been his peak years, he absolutely would have scored more goals if he had taken better care of himself and was as committed as Ronaldo, he'd also have 3-4 more years of goals ahead instead of being on probably his last season. He could/should be sat on at least 30 more PL goals.
 

Dobbs

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
4,696
Was it Barney Ronay who said a young Rooney's body was a happy accident? As in it shouldn't have worked but it did....brilliantly. I think that sums it up.

I guess as you get older having an unconventional physique can backfire. Tends to be the more "natural" athletes that can go on and on.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
As he approaches the end of his career he has left behind quite a body of achievement on paper. Five Premier League titles, a Champions League, an FA Cup, a League Cup, England's all-time record goalscorer, United's joint all time record goalscorer, finishing as high as fifth in the Ballon D'Or alongside numerous other individual awards. A remarkable career.

With all that in mind, do you think he ultimately fulfilled the potential we all saw when he burst onto the scene? Or could/should he have done more given how gifted he was?
No. Young Rooney was a phenom on the level of Messi. He had absolutely everything in him to be the most complete attacking player this era would ever see. He could and should have been able to play every position in the attacking third to a world class level in a pinch.

The closest thing we'd seen to Di Stefano since the great man hung up his boots.

Rooney instead became a jack of all trades towards the end and won plenty of trophies, but he never was the same player after that injury against Bayern in 2010 and his contract shenanigans the season after was pretty much the end of him as a truly world class player. He became productive, but it was often to the detriment of team fluidity and his own performance within that team dynamic
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
he should not have even been starting for England in World Cup 2014
he was the second highest English scorer in the PL behind sturridge (17 goals)
and he was the English player with the highest no. of assists in the PL that season (11 assists)

he was definitely one of the best England had on form that WC. In fact the 2 goals england scored was created by Rooney and scored by him. Who else was supposed to start instead of him?

He has 1 Premier League goal this season, 8 last season, 12 the season before...

These should have been his peak years, he absolutely would have scored more goals if he had taken better care of himself and was as committed as Ronaldo, he'd also have 3-4 more years of goals ahead instead of being on probably his last season. He could/should be sat on at least 30 more PL goals.
He is a much more involved player than most strikers though. He was always more of a box to box forward in that you could always expect him to run his socks off defensively and offensively. my guess is that takes its toll especally since he has been doing it since 16.
 

Dobbs

New Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2015
Messages
4,696
he was the second highest English scorer in the PL behind sturridge (17 goals)
and he was the English player with the highest no. of assists in the PL that season (11 assists)

he was definitely one of the best England had on form that WC. In fact the 2 goals england scored was created by Rooney and scored by him. Who else was supposed to start instead of him?
Sturridge did start ahead of him. For some reason we then had to find him a spot. You can't really think he was the best option for the left wing role?
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,479
he was the second highest English scorer in the PL behind sturridge (17 goals)
and he was the English player with the highest no. of assists in the PL that season (11 assists)

he was definitely one of the best England had on form that WC. In fact the 2 goals england scored was created by Rooney and scored by him. Who else was supposed to start instead of him?
He cost us tactically in that first game by sulking out wide. It was a classic case of Rooney disguising his performances, disguising how he tactically hindered the team by grabbing an assist or a goal. Sterling had to play out of position next game and was eventually dropped because Rooney put his foot down re: team selection and tactics.

We saw the same thing at United, fans being blinded as to him being a hindrance by hiding behind assists/goals.
 

prath92

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Messages
12,322
Location
India
Sturridge did start ahead of him. For some reason we then had to find him a spot. You can't really think he was the best option for the left wing role?
He should have played behind sturridge. Sterling is clearly a better winger than an AM and should have started as a winger with Rooney central.

He cost us tactically in that first game by sulking out wide. It was a classic case of Rooney disguising his performances, disguising how he tactically hindered the team by grabbing an assist or a goal. Sterling had to play out of position next game and was eventually dropped because Rooney put his foot down re: team selection and tactics.

We saw the same thing at United, fans being blinded as to him being a hindrance by hiding behind assists/goals.
sterling had/has played as a winger almost his entire career for liverpool and man city and when he was asked to do that for England, that was somehow out of position for him?:rolleyes:

He was dropped in the third game because,iirc, England were already eliminated and Hodgson decided to give the squad players like Shaw Smalling and all a game. Nothing to do with Rooney putting his foot down or whatever. Iirc Rooney himself didnt start that game

The simple fact was that neither welbeck nor sterling played well, and that had nothing to do with the position. We saw the same thing this euro too. Fans blaming the team performance on Rooney not noticing that none of the other players were playing well. and then blaming Rooney for them not playing well. This Euro it was Kane and Alli.
 

Reiver

Full Member
Joined
Sep 27, 2016
Messages
2,682
Location
Near Glasgow
Overall, no I don't think he did realise his potential but the degree to which he didn't will depend on your individual view on how great his potential was. When you look back at some of the goals he scored earlier in his career it reminds you of how good he was/how good we thought he'd go on to be.

In his defence he's probably been the most hyped up English player ever. Could he ever have met everyone's high expectations? I think many of his detractors may see him in a different light when he's gone/retired.

Either way, I'm happy and proud with his achievements at Utd and I'm sure he is too and rightly so.
 

Sparky_Hughes

I am Shitbeard.
Joined
Mar 26, 2008
Messages
17,541
He certainly lived up to his own potential, one look at his cv tells you that, what he didn't live up to where the ridiculous sky high expectations of a success starved English press/public, but no one short of messi or Ronnie could have.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,444
He certainly lived up to his own potential, one look at his cv tells you that, what he didn't live up to where the ridiculous sky high expectations of a success starved English press/public, but no one short of messi or Ronnie could have.
Thats a pretty fair assessment of Rooney's career i think. If offered the career he's had at 16 he would have been very happy to take it.
 

Sparky10Legend

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
2,943
He played most of his career in a 442 as one of the strikers and a second striker is a striker. People exaggerate with the positions Rooney played.

This, the VAST majority (would be interested to see the stats) of his career he has been either SS/CF or Striker.

My "guess" would be around

65% at No 10
25% at No 9
10% at "other"

Certainly his peak was at 9/10 so his goals output wasnt negatively affected. Shearer at Blackburn was a force of nature, in my view a good distance better than anything Rooney produced. Thats not to put Rooney down as Shearer was some player for 4/5 years.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,444
This, the VAST majority (would be interested to see the stats) of his career he has been either SS/CF or Striker.
But as we know centre forward and no9 are not the same thing as second striker or no10 though mate. Look at the year Rooney played as a centre forward in 09/10 he was on course to score 40 goals before his injury against Bayern and ended up scoring 35-36. Now he most likely wouldn't have been that prolific every year. But if he played up there for the majority of his career his goal record would be higher than it is now, probably much higher.

Rooney's played the majority of his career much deeper not sure why people keep saying he's a centre forward and comparing him to centre forwards.

Here's his positional stats mate if you are interested. Though they are incomplete they are missing a lot of games from his first 3 seasons.

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/wayne-rooney/leistungsdaten/spieler/3332/plus/0?saison=ges
 

Sparky10Legend

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 27, 2010
Messages
2,943
But as we know centre forward and no9 are not the same thing as second striker or no10 though mate. Look at the year Rooney played as a centre forward in 09/10 he was on course to score 40 goals before his injury against Bayern and ended up scoring 35-36. Now he most likely wouldn't have been that prolific every year. But if he played up there for the majority of his career his goal record would be higher than it is now, probably much higher.

Rooney's played the majority of his career much deeper not sure why people keep saying he's a centre forward and comparing him to centre forwards.

Here's his positional stats mate if you are interested. Though they are incomplete they are missing a lot of games from his first 3 seasons.

http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/wayne-rooney/leistungsdaten/spieler/3332/plus/0?saison=ges

I certainly get that, and agree with your point.

The one thing i would say though is that you cant compare him ,either, with say Frank Lampard. Somewhere in between perhaps.
 

Joga Bonito

The Art of Football
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
8,253
He should have played behind sturridge. Sterling is clearly a better winger than an AM and should have started as a winger with Rooney central. sterling had/has played as a winger almost his entire career for liverpool and man city and when he was asked to do that for England, that was somehow out of position for him?:rolleyes:
It definitely wasn't clear cut at that point of time and in the second half of Liverpool's season he was one of their foremost players, and exhibited his best form of his budding career, playing at the tip of the diamond behind Suarez and Sturridge iirc.

The simple fact was that neither welbeck nor sterling played well, and that had nothing to do with the position. We saw the same thing this euro too. Fans blaming the team performance on Rooney not noticing that none of the other players were playing well. and then blaming Rooney for them not playing well. This Euro it was Kane and Alli.
Aye, at times people tend to place a disproportionate amount of blame on him, but the fact is that he was woeful for England in just about every major competition post Euro 2004, as too were most other English players. Rooney's display against Iceland in the Euros has to be one of the worst displays I've seen from a player of his stature on the international stage.
 

AKDevil

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
3,007
Location
London, England
Yes. I reckon if you go back to the start and said he would do all he has done, that would be considered fulfilling his potential.
Also, think too much is expected of wonder kids. If Rooney is considered to have not fulfilled his potential then most players don't have a chance.
When a kid breaks through it's only natural to think the Sky is the limit and they are going to change the face of football but reality is not many actually live up to the great hopes we have for them, which makes me think those hopes are unrealistic.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
21,444
I certainly get that, and agree with your point.

The one thing i would say though is that you cant compare him ,either, with say Frank Lampard. Somewhere in between perhaps.
Yeah the position he plays is more a deep striker or second striker as most people say. He's doesn't really play as a no10 the way most attacking midfielders who are usually described as no10's play.

Things used to be a lot simpler in English football, you were a midfielder, a winger or a striker now theres probably dozens of attacking positions.
 

UnrelatedPsuedo

I pity the poor fool who stinks like I do!
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Messages
10,636
Location
Blitztown
Often think that players that stay somewhere past their best years are treated harsher than others that spend a key 3 years somewhere.

Had Rooney just passed through the club and given us the best 4-5 seasons of his career he'd be held in far higher regard.
 

MrBest

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
2,868
He burst into the prem at just 16. That alone is rare and for the 10 years that followed was an exceptional player.

The last 5 years have not been great for Wayne, he has looked leggy, uninterested and just seems to have lost a lot of ability and hunger (for the game not food). The one stat that has improved is his leadership or ability to influence by him just being there. He has always been a vocal person

The days when we had Ronaldo he would tirelessly create chnaces for him, scoop up his mistakes. He was actually a 21 year old in a 27 year olds body! That probably makes him 38 or 39 now.

He was probably the best teenage talent that England has ever had, not a messi or ronaldo but certainly in my top 5 globally. His main downfall has been his body type and his personal life (weight grannys prossies fags booze). If he had less exposed personal circunstances I reckon he would of lasted an extra 2 years then started his decline.

Saying that, you cannot really blame him for making mistakes as we are all human and thats part of the package. He for me witj certainty reached the heights of his ability between 21 years and 26. The young rooney bossed games, bullied players, darted threw crowds, knew how to throw his weight, the aggression, the passion and technical ability was all there. He was a joy to watch in his prime. Without him, would ronaldo have scored 31 league goals? No way! He did the dog work, cleaned up the play. 2009/2010/2011 was his best seasons for me (if I remember correctly).

I hope when he does retire he comes back to united and trains with the younger lot. His influence is second to none and the amoung of recognition and respect he has gained is unparalleled.
 

The BlackGaijin

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 27, 2016
Messages
786
Location
Japan
People actually believe that Luis biting Suarez is already better that Rooney at his peak? Well, to each his own. Back on topic..

I think it is unfair to judge Rooney on the performance of the national team. Not even Maradona could have done rescued the English team in the last decade. England has been getting increasingly shit for some time starting with the managerial appointments to the players and the tactics.
Messi can’t win a world cup playing next to Aguero, Higuain, tevez and Di Maria. Somehow Rooney was supposed to do the same playing next to crouch, Glen Johnson, Henderson or Andros Townsend.?

Yes, the man fulfilled his potential. He peaked early and he has regressed since but at his best he was unplayable.
 

CG1010

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2012
Messages
3,687
Was Wayne Rooney one of the greatest talents Britain has ever had? Was he in terms of potential as good as Charlton, Best, Law... Gascoigne?

In terms of technical ability, I don't think he was the best footballer we have produced in terms of talent from these shores, but what Wayne had that put him in the very top tier of British talents was this ferocious enthusiasm for the game, a blend of raw brute strength, electric pace, direct dribbling, vicious shooting ability, play-making ability and a brilliant sense of timing, when he burst onto the scene.. he seemed a man destined to star on the biggest of stages. A man-child who shone on the starriest of stages - make no bones about it, out of the group of Messi, Ronaldo, Rooney, Robben (all breaking through at the same time), if there was one of that quartet who you think would naturally be the 'Iniesta' of the big games, or the first to develop into a big household name it would have been Rooney. The way he burst on to the scene, the aggression and directness he demonstrated for example in that match v France in Euro 2004.


A guy with that level of natural talent, could and should have harnessed that talent into Ballon D'or winning level performances. I don't think he had it in him to win successive Ballon D'ors, or become a better player than Messi or Ronaldo.. I think even a maxed out Rooney would still due to his body type, have slowed down and not had a long career at his peak even if he lived like a monk. He in many ways reminded me of a Kaka, a physical force of nature with some brilliant technical attributes and a good footballing brain, who could have been one of the leading players in the world, or the BPITW for a season or two before fading away.

The real letdown with Wayne, is that his peak.. never actually came. The 09/10 peak, where he became a number 9.. it was good don't get me wrong, but it wasn't the peak any of us envisaged. The Rooney we saw as a kid wasn't destined to have one or two seasons trying to imitate Alan Shearer, he was meant to have seasons where his goalscoring and his playmaking both hit superstar levels at the same time, like Messi has done season after season. He was meant to be a Gascoigne and Shearer combined for 2-3 seasons.. but injury, lack of attention to fitness, meant his flame didn't burn as bright as it should have done.

Top scorer for England and United, is that what we all expected and has he delivered? well it is what we expected but we didn't expect him to get to it in the manner he has. TBH he has done it in an undeserved way, forcing himself on various managers and staying long beyond what his form merited. Rooney should not have been at United since 2014, he should not have even been starting for England in World Cup 2014.. so the truth of the matter is, had he been treated on merit.. he would be nowhere near the records. Now that he has the records, well done to him.. regardless of how he has got there, he's done it, so that is great but for people to use it as a way of saying he lived up to his potential.. no. If anything the fact he got the records, despite never reaching the level he should have demonstrates what a truly special player he is or was.

When I look at his contempories, guys like Torres, David Villa, Drogba, Eto'o.. these days Lewandowski, Aguero, Zlatan, Luis Suarez.. Rooney had the potential to leave some of these guys in the dust. His aggression, his pace, his all-round game.. I remember there was once a time when he was acknowledged to be comfortably better than a Luis Suarez. Now if you said that, people wouid laugh at you. He was a phenomenon but people forget that.

To summarise, a great player who had the potential to be an all time british legend, but due to exceptionally bad luck with injuries, and his many failings as a man won't be remembered as a better player than the likes of Charlton, Best or as fondly as a Gascoigne. Even if we had 2-3 years of prime, peak Rooney from 23-26 and he then faded into obscurity.. that would have been enough to see him at his best.. but the truth is, injuries robbed us of his true peak and he never really had the discipline to really get himself back into top top physical condition and thus we were left with a good, great but not a legendary version of Rooney for majority of his career.
Top post. Enjoyed reading that.