Mickeza
still gets no respect
Yeah in fairness he isn’t dross. He’s just exceptionally average and we need better to challenge AWB.I meant internationally, but point taken. Still, don't see exactly why everyone is calling him dross.
Yeah in fairness he isn’t dross. He’s just exceptionally average and we need better to challenge AWB.I meant internationally, but point taken. Still, don't see exactly why everyone is calling him dross.
Was decent, some good moments and some average moments. Ruben Dias and Bernardo Silva were no better
Someone else said earlier in the thread he has 2 years left on his current deal. When did he sign a 5 year deal?No I meant if we sent him on loan for a year he'd come back with only a year left.
So was Bruno Fernandes, Ruben Dias and Bernardo Silva. In good company tonight
A clearly better player than AWB. Selling him and keeping the one who can't pass to save his life in the name of "rebuild" would be so typical of us.
Aye, a few dangerous moments for the fans in the stadium when he walloped it wildly over a few times.Naw. Bruno had much more of a positive influence on their attacking play than Darlot. I'm not saying he was perfect but he produced a few dangerous moments.
Aye, a few dangerous moments for the fans in the stadium when he walloped it wildly over a few times.
What accolades did he have to his name for us to spend so much on him at the time? Was he that good at youth level? Because I’m pretty sure he only played about 2 senior games for Porto
Think sometimes on here we only talk in extremes about our players. No real middle ground.I don't get it either. He's a young 22 year old player who is obviously still developing. The need to attack him is strange.
I think there's a decent player in there, but I'd agree I'm not sure he's the one to challenge AWB. Although I wouldn't mind giving him a go if we spend the money elsewhere.Yeah in fairness he isn’t dross. He’s just exceptionally average and we need better to challenge AWB.
Naw. Bruno had much more of a positive influence on their attacking play than Darlot. I'm not saying he was perfect but he produced a few dangerous moments.
He was hugely rated in Portugal at the time. And we also had Woodward and Judge in charge, so there's that with regards to the money.
the transfer was all on Jose. A cynic would say he just wanted to buy any young player to prove his critics wrong.
if I remember we paid more than his release clause to get him a couple of months early.
poor signing.
Nah comes down to decision making, chances are you won't score from him it from 40 yards out, rather than get it back into the box with 4/5 of your teammates inside it.You don't score if you don't shoot.
Ffs you lot on here expect a prime Messi every match
Surely he's off to Milan for a reunion with José when they play Roma
Nah comes down to decision making, chances are you won't score from him it from 40 yards out, rather than get it back into the box with 4/5 of your teammates inside it.
So you think an attacking midfielder had more of an influence on attack than a rightback. Well thats surprising
I'd be inclined to keep him. He's just turned 22, has lots of attacking potential and we don't have to pay a fee for him. Rather keep him than spend 25M and higher wages on Trippier, when we could be spending it on a DM or CB.
If you take a step back, we've bought him as an inexperienced teenager and he's now 22 and gone from not ready to being a decent Milan player and starting for Portugal. Runs well and has some skill so if he continues to develop on the normal trajectory should be a decent attacking fullback in his prime years he's about to go into (if you figure fullbacks peak a little early around 24-27 or so).
He was highly rated youngster who was tracked by most of big Clubs if reports at that time were to believed and the reason we paid bit higher than release clause was to probably get better transfer fee structure paid in installments instead of paying the complete fee upfront.the transfer was all on Jose. A cynic would say he just wanted to buy any young player to prove his critics wrong.
if I remember we paid more than his release clause to get him a couple of months early.
poor signing.
I'm not sure that comparison holds much water because Shaw had some credit in the bank. In fact he was one of the most highly rated young full backs around playing regularly in the PL for Southampton and had plenty of good performances for us. We had to work on his mindset and it took a while but the tools were quite apparent.Some sense here, agreed.
We have 50 million RB, Diogo Dalot is a decent cover with potential. He can turn it around, if Shaw can, anyone can.
Some sense here, agreed.
We have 50 million RB, Diogo Dalot is a decent cover with potential. He can turn it around, if Shaw can, anyone can.
Someone else said earlier in the thread he has 2 years left on his current deal. When did he sign a 5 year deal?
So what's this newbie on about?3 years ago when we signed him.
So what's this newbie on about?
I don’t know who we could get that would be cheap, good enough and also happy to sit on the bench for 2/3 of the season when Ole possibly pulls a Williams/Telles on them. He might not be good enough to be a regular starter for us but he’s a decent backup and I think he’s a more aggressive attacker than AWB. He was pretty good for Milan against us and he’s not hiding here tonight either.