It's not beyond the realm of possibility that Trump just watched Mission Impossible and tried to sell Jon Voight a NOC list.Surprised it’s not a NOC list or the like.
It's not beyond the realm of possibility that Trump just watched Mission Impossible and tried to sell Jon Voight a NOC list.Surprised it’s not a NOC list or the like.
It's not beyond the realm of possibility that Trump just watched Mission Impossible and tried to sell Jon Voight a NOC list.
We're at the point where none of this matters anymore. Even if the FBI has tapes of him selling the nuclear codes to Russia 50% of his base won't care and the other 50% will believe its the deep state. If we survive this era I think historians are going to look back on this time as a case study of group madness.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Used a nail gun also.Trump supporter walked into a FBI office in Ohio today with an AK-15 and got himself killed.
Pirro is trying so hard
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Stupid construction workerUsed a nail gun also.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
There is only ONE way to get rid of traitors selling their own country to a foreign power. Hope the FBI will have enough material to demand maximum punishment.
There is no reason to have those documents outside of the White House other than to use them for personal gain. Absolutely none. Espionage is still a capital crime though so we got that going for us.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Presidents have generally been allowed to maintain their clearance/access in case their successor needs someone to talk to about some national security events. I don't know about what documents they've taken with them, but there's no reason to have any documents related to nuclear weapons at all. Even if they aren't about our nukes, the data could be very useful for foreign actors or as leverage. I've seen suggestions that Trump could use information about the Saudis or other parties to ensure that they keep their promised bribes coming.is there any precedent for this at all in the history of presidents in the us? keeping classified and sensitive documents after you leave office? i'm curious as to how carlson or whoever will try and frame this. i'm guessing this might be unprecedented.
yeah i've just done a quick scan of fox news, carlson is coincidentally absent tonight, breitbart, and a few other places i'd expect to see some kind of reframing of this. all i've gathered is obama brought 30 million documents with him. the difference, of course, is that these documents were for his presidential library and most likely didn't include information on nuclear weapons. if the nuclear weapon thing is true, i'd say trump is fecking toast.Presidents have generally been allowed to maintain their clearance/access in case their successor needs someone to talk to about some national security events. I don't know about what documents they've taken with them, but there's no reason to have any documents related to nuclear weapons at all. Even if they aren't about our nukes, the data could be very useful for foreign actors or as leverage. I've seen suggestions that Trump could use information about the Saudis or other parties to ensure that they keep their promised bribes coming.
Biden also denied Trump continued access/clearance because of January 6th. I forgot to mention that.yeah i've just done a quick scan of fox news, carlson is coincidentally absent tonight, breitbart, and a few other places i'd expect to see some kind of reframing of this. all i've gathered is obama brought 30 million documents with him. the difference, of course, is that these documents were for his presidential library and most likely didn't include information on nuclear weapons. if the nuclear weapon thing is true, i'd say trump is fecking toast.
basically obama's library and clinton's emails are what i've seen used. unless they can demonstrate obama had nuclear data or something of that nature which he wasn't supposed to have, if trump wasn't allowed to have it, which i don't know, then it'll be interesting to see what they come up with. could be the point where all the bullshit falls apart. or not. still has 100 million people who think he's god so who knows.
tomorrow should be very interesting.Biden also denied Trump continued access/clearance because of January 6th. I forgot to mention that.
Lyndon Johnson took classified documents with him related to clandestine surveillance of Nixon’s campaign and how it worked to bribe South Vietnam to not accept any peace agreement until after he was elected… but there weren’t any laws about doing that kinda thing yet.is there any precedent for this at all in the history of presidents in the us? keeping classified and sensitive documents after you leave office? i'm curious as to how carlson or whoever will try and frame this. i'm guessing this might be unprecedented.
the thing about the johnson files too is that they related to an investigation of soon to be president who had acted seditiously. at least, many would argue that the kissinger and nixon talks with south vietnam were treasonous even if they weren't charged. it's a different order of retention than nuclear secrets. so yeah, if they found nuclear secrets that trump absolutely had no right to have, which would seem to be the case, then i see no way out of that no matter how you spin it.Lyndon Johnson took classified documents with him related to clandestine surveillance of Nixon’s campaign and how it worked to bribe South Vietnam to not accept any peace agreement until after he was elected… but there weren’t any laws about doing that kinda thing yet.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
I really appreciate that guy’s use of Twitter.Mark Hertling giving a quick seminar on how to handle classified military documents and how to diffrentiate the different levels of secrecy with documents.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
We want sextapes!
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He already has a copy of the warrant; nothing stopping him from putting it out now. Think he wants it to come from the DOJ so he can call it fake, a conspiracy etc. Or he’ll keep saying he wants it unsealed and have his lawyers do the opposite in court.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He might be banking on them having to redact document titles, subject areas and classifications so he can do the handwaving complaint about them being on fishing expeditions thing again. I'd expect there to be a few "and partial/complete copies thereof" type headings in there as well.He already has a copy of the warrant; nothing stopping him from putting it out now. Think he wants it to come from the DOJ so he can call it fake, a conspiracy etc. Or he’ll keep saying he wants it unsealed and have his lawyers do the opposite in court.