Nou_Camp99
what would Souness do?
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2013
- Messages
- 10,274
Literally no chance of that ever happening though.Fan owned should be the only acceptable outcome.
feck the petrodollars.
Literally no chance of that ever happening though.Fan owned should be the only acceptable outcome.
feck the petrodollars.
You prefer homophobic misogynistic head chopping vermin ?I’d rather have the Dubai cnuts than the Glazer cnuts. At least the Dubai cnuts won’t steal our own generated money to fill their own pockets.
All I want is someone who can run the club well and provide the structure for success. Preferably without using the club for sportwashing if possible. Take your dividends if you must, just manage the damn thing sensibly.Erm dont the Glazers do this?
This pipedream of wanting a perfect owner who is also not tight needs to disappear. Its never going to happen.
this made me laugh way more than it should of!What even is an Emirate? A stadium, a country, an airline?
Am I an Emirate?
Agreed. I hate the Glazers but at least we're not used for sportswashing. I'd rather a normal(-ish) businessman like Boehly.English owned > Dubai owned
Afaik, Emirates are hereditary titles and places like Duchies and the UAE is made up of several of them.What even is an Emirate? A stadium, a country, an airline?
Am I an Emirate?
I called this 3 weeks ago…
Worth a change.You prefer homophobic misogynistic head chopping vermin ?
Have a look at a breakdown of Dubai's GDPThis article states they have the second largest reserve of the emirates and also it’s going to run out in 20 years
Use some logic. It’s literally a tiny patch of sand with no other apparent resources. Where do you think they got the cash from, or how do you think they subsidise what they’re doing with no tax. And how do they continue to do that when the oil runs out.
…. But what happens after the Arabs get bored of waving their football ding dongs at each other?
United need to be self sustaining and not fed by a sugar daddy like City.
Dubai have been up to a lot of head chopping?You prefer homophobic misogynistic head chopping vermin ?
Abu Dhabi has been funding (from oil) the other Emirates for years but Dubai is not (or atleast lesser now than before) dependent on Abu Dhabi funds anymore due to tourism and being an international financial hub (will probably, if not already overtake London in that regard). Both Emirates/cities are probably the two richest in the world and probably have the largest reserve of feck you money so doubt it would affect anything if both owned the Manchester clubs. Dubai is also way more liberal and western-oriented than Abu Dhabi.How would it work with Abu Dhabi (City owners) being by far the richest of the Emirates?
I've read oil production counts for one percent of their GDP.This article states they have the second largest reserve of the emirates and also it’s going to run out in 20 years
Use some logic. It’s literally a tiny patch of sand with no other apparent resources. Where do you think they got the cash from, or how do you think they subsidise what they’re doing with no tax. And how do they continue to do that when the oil runs out.
Great. Let Liverpool's club and history be sullied instead if they want. It makes not being a Liverpool fan all the better.But let me tell you this. If they don’t get United, they WILL buy Liverpool…..
I misread that and wondered why she would sponsor our clubBurj Khalifa Old Trafford
No morals, only trophies
Iceland is beside Greenland, Greenland is owned by Denmark, Denmark is part of NATO, the USA are also part of NATO and they dropped nuclear bombs on Japan.Can't we get bought by one of those good countries, you know, like... Iceland?
*waits for someone to tell me how evil Iceland is*
Everything is possible!Literally no chance of that ever happening though.
Gdp is not income. Dubai attracts business because they offer incredibly low levels of tax. They can do this because the state is tiny and makes a lot of money from oil. They assume that once the oil dries up and they start levying taxes that businesses will stay. Given the state will still be tiny they probably won’t have to raise taxes that much to keep turning over, but if they don’t they also won’t have the oceans of cash they currently have. If they raise taxes in line with what the rest of the world charges what business in their right mind stays in a desert with 50 degree plus heat and a repressive regime?Have a look at a breakdown of Dubai's GDP
Where are you from?You prefer homophobic misogynistic head chopping vermin ?
They tend to prefer the nicer stuff like stoning and chopping limbs off.Dubai have been up to a lot of head chopping?
No way mate. They're significantly better and still shite, but Saudis are another level.No way. Only marginally ahead of Saudis. Terrible record on human rights, womens rights, gay rights etc etc. We would be no better than City. Don’t want our club to be a sportswashing “project”.
Ireland.Where are you from?
I think it's a way better option than the Saudis solely based on that the influx of tourists, foreign companies has made the Dubai Emirate way more liberal and western-oriented than it used to be (like 15-20 years ago). Saudi Arabia are planning to build an isolated Dubai in the desert, but doubt that will make the country more secular.It’s a slightly less awful option than the Saudis, I guess?
even still, we don’t need an oil daddy with questionable human rights records. The club earns more than enough revenue to compete with those already, we just need owners willing to spend all that money within the club and not taking it from it.
How on earth is fan ownership possible? Unless you are referring to Ratcliffe who is a fan but also very very rich.Everything is possible!
But yeah, I'm talking more about some billionaire United fan (or group of) passing through a mid life crisis.
ChesterMan Tited?Both owned by emirate nations, Manchester city and Manchester United finally put their differences to become one super club, under their new name symbolizing the merging of the two clubs: Manchester United.
Works great for Barceloana.Fan owned should be the only acceptable outcome.
feck the petrodollars.
I don't believe that figure for a second otherwise Ratcliffe would have already paid it. Didn't the Saudis already offer around 4 billion a few years ago? Glazers want way more than that£3.75bn is a reasonable price for the biggest sports franchise in the world.