SER19
Full Member
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2008
- Messages
- 12,693
No I didn't. I replied to the quoted text, and elaborated based on my feelings about the preoccupation many high profile voices in the women's game seem to have with men, in the very clear context of the way the OP presented this. Of course this is less relevant in terms of this specific girls story which isn't clear in the OP."Chip on shoulder" is, among other things, synonymous with entitlement. The other two accusations aren't particularly kind either.
And no, I haven't said anything about the exact type of person you are. I said that making the assumption that this was because of entitled women says something about you. In you case, that you have a particularly uncharitable view of women's football and/or its players. And no, you having coached women wouldn't make that impossible, given that you have coached women and still managed to describe them as a group having an "inferiority complex/chip on shoulder/constant obsession over position relative to male football."
It's also kind of precious that you're having a go at me making unkind assumptions about you, when I only addressed it because you made an unkind assumption with regards to the reason behind this.
You said 'These knee-jerk reactions are extremely telling of the people that post them'
What is extremely telling. Stop projecting your obsession about 'entitled women' on me I didn't bloody say anything like that.
Last edited: