Ed Woodward - "something'll 'appen this summer littleman"

RkkMan

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,179
Same thing was said last year in regards to Greenwood and Williams.

I'm thinking Grealish might be coming instead of Sancho now due to costs. Possibly Bellingham too and that might be the end of our summer spending.
Grealish doesn`t even play on the RW? That one seems more dependent on Pogba and it was briefed he`d be purchased for depth in MIDFIELD
 

Devil may care

New Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2010
Messages
35,976
This an exercise in PR as much as it is an exercise in transfer business savvy. The club might make mistakes in its football operations, but it doesn’t do bad PR on a wider scale. We’re no Liverpool.

United boast about £100 million transfer targets while 800 UK citizens die every day.”

Woodward isn’t daft. He doesn’t want that headline attached to the brand. Football will wait until the situation has calmed somewhat before big money starts to enter discussion again.
This sums it up but that wont stop there being another 100 posts about not getting Sancho.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,226
So we're not going to be spending treble the usual amount during a massive world emergency?
I for one am shocked.
 

Champagne Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
4,187
Location
El Beatle
Grealish doesn`t even play on the RW? That one seems more dependent on Pogba and it was briefed he`d be purchased for depth in MIDFIELD
All kinds of rumours today from The Athletic that Ole is thinking to buy Grealish and play him on the right. He'd be half the cost of Sancho, so the board might be leaning towards that due to finances being hit.
 

OleGunnar20

Full Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
2,194
Much prefer this to the dick measuring 'welcome to Disneyland' Ed we've come to know
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,411
All kinds of rumours today from The Athletic that Ole is thinking to buy Grealish and play him on the right. He'd be half the cost of Sancho, so the board might be leaning towards that due to finances being hit.
He’s not a right winger so it would be a complete waste of money. Grealish isn’t cheap they’ll want £70m or so, you don’t spend that sort of money then play him out of position. I think Grealish will come in if Pogba leaves.
 

RkkMan

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,179
All kinds of rumours today from The Athletic that Ole is thinking to buy Grealish and play him on the right. He'd be half the cost of Sancho, so the board might be leaning towards that due to finances being hit.
Its an opinion from Mitten on how versatile Grealish can be not a definitive brief from Utd that its where he will be used
 

Zlatattack

New Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2017
Messages
7,374
Even on a "limited" budget we can still target a decent RW and a specialist CDM.

Frankly we should remortgage for Sancho if he's willing to come.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,735
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
All kinds of rumours today from The Athletic that Ole is thinking to buy Grealish and play him on the right. He'd be half the cost of Sancho, so the board might be leaning towards that due to finances being hit.
This is why we are where we are now.

That logic got us Valencia as a replacement for Ronaldo.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,280
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)

Adam-Utd

Part of first caf team to complete Destiny raid
Joined
Sep 10, 2010
Messages
39,954
All kinds of rumours today from The Athletic that Ole is thinking to buy Grealish and play him on the right. He'd be half the cost of Sancho, so the board might be leaning towards that due to finances being hit.
Absolute rubbish :lol: and if you're paying money for those sort of opinions then you're even more foolish !
 

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,701
Location
C-137
It doesn’t make any difference.

so prior to Corona Sancho would have cost £120m. Dortmund would have used that to buy 3 players at £40m each, say.

So now no one can offer Dortmund more than £80m. Dortmund is also getting discounts on those 3 players they wanted to, £25m each.

every club is affected by this. The less richer clubs more so.
You do normally get a slump in sales until the new reality steps in. At least in housing markets
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,253
Location
Lucilinburhuc
People in the Kane, Pogba and Sancho threads are losing their time. I didn't bother to check the transfer forum since the outbreak, because any sensible person would know this summer not much will happen in terms of big money transfers. Cheaper or free transfers is something different
 

Eli Zee

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
1,061
For what it’s worth, I’m sure we could take advantage and bring a few players in but for the fact we could really do with offloading four or five on good wages and that just got a lot harder.
After this, I’m sure all player contracts will include a “pandemic clause” or something of the sorts, if they don’t already.
 

Seven Seas Sardines

Full Member
Joined
May 24, 2015
Messages
3,090
Location
Bolivia til 2024
For what it’s worth, I’m sure we could take advantage and bring a few players in but for the fact we could really do with offloading four or five on good wages and that just got a lot harder.
I wish UEFA and FIFA decide to put a salary cap due to the circumstances. Sanchez down to 100k might make it possible to offload.
 

Champagne Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2015
Messages
4,187
Location
El Beatle
This is why we are where we are now.

That logic got us Valencia as a replacement for Ronaldo.
Well with this whole pandemic thing, nobody knows if we'll be spending or not.

Grealish can already play 2 forward positions perfectly, so I don't think it's too much of a stretch to think he can play a 3rd forward position, not to mention he can play in a midfield 3 with Bruno and Matic/Fred if we are trying to breakdown a team who is parking the bus. He could cover for Rashford on the left if Martial gets injured where Rashford needs to play as striker.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,543
Location
Polska
United never forced huge prices on buyers so much needed clearout can still be continued. Two or three good signings can still happen and if it won't suffice Ole will probably reinforce squad with academy players like Gomes and Laird.

If this window will get us somewhere near title race or not it's probably discussion in another thread, but from what I remember United see this window as bigger opportunity then the last ones.
 

RkkMan

Full Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,179
Well with this whole pandemic thing, nobody knows if we'll be spending or not.

Grealish can already play 2 forward positions perfectly, so I don't think it's too much of a stretch to think he can play a 3rd forward position, not to mention he can play in a midfield 3 with Bruno and Matic/Fred if we are trying to breakdown a team who is parking the bus. He could cover for Rashford on the left if Martial gets injured where Rashford needs to play as striker.
He`s played as a RW for like 12 games his whole career according to Transfermarkt that`ll be like fitting a square peg in a round hole. We weren`t in for him to play as a RW before doubt that changes regardless.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,317
This will be the norm for all clubs. Its possibly the start of the cost of all football moving downward, there were indicators it had hit its peak before the virus happened.

The only risk is the oil clubs keep spending like nothing has changed and wreck football more than they already have done.
 

horsechoker

The Caf's Roy Keane.
Joined
Apr 16, 2015
Messages
52,375
Location
The stable
This will be the norm for all clubs. Its possibly the start of the cost of all football moving downward, there were indicators it had hit its peak before the virus happened.

The only risk is the oil clubs keep spending like nothing has changed and wreck football more than they already have done.
That's something I'm afraid of, the oil clubs decide to capitalise and buy up the talent which puts them miles ahead of even the traditional elite.
 

Zen86

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2007
Messages
13,944
Location
Sunny Manc
I prefer his good old statements of how big our war chest is to double the price of every player we look at.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,298
This will be the norm for all clubs. Its possibly the start of the cost of all football moving downward, there were indicators it had hit its peak before the virus happened.

The only risk is the oil clubs keep spending like nothing has changed and wreck football more than they already have done.
Pretty much exactly what i was going to post.
 

laughtersassassin

Full Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2014
Messages
11,497
All I know is there is zero excuses for RW. We haven't had a player who can play there since Nani.

How can we be a serious club when they is a fact. It's madness
 

hubbuh

New Member
Joined
Jun 29, 2010
Messages
6,110
Location
UK, hun?
Coronavirus or not, it's a 60m netspend as usual incoming. Call me cynical, the recent good PR by the club was also to soften blow of little investment by the Glazers. Same old nonsense, we have over 30 points to make up to compete. The acceptance of budget by fans feels like Arsenal now, it's awfully sad.
We spent £85m on slabgod in the summer! We are amongst the highest spenders in the world! Arsenal me ‘arris.
 

Shiva87

Full Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2009
Messages
2,854
Location
Mumbai, India
This is a good statement to be honest. He has made some serious errors of judgment on transfers, but he is handling this crisis much better than other CEOs. I guess leading a 'non-football' business for many years has given him some competence to deal with these times, which a lot of football based administrators don't have.

I see this as a positive for two reasons: (1) No one can doubt the reasonableness of his comments on football going through a tough patch and therefore those transfer figures are delusional; and (2) He is setting public groundwork for his negotiations, where the conversation cannot start from those points. If a club needs to / wants to sell a player - they will know that the market for the +$100 mm deals just does not exist.

It will be a good opportunity for United to strengthen given the clubs financial health in the summer. There is no doubt about it. However, it remains to be seen if the Glazers chose to strengthen the football side of things, or continue to demand that the club distribute significant dividends instead of the money being used to move us towards the top of the table.