I said it 2 months ago, that Ed would use the situation to spend less. It was tongue in cheek but looks like it will come to pass
Rashford can play on the right too. Remember that cracking finish in the win over Spurs at Wembley. If Sancho is the one they want but can't sign him this upcoming window, there's no point signing a specialist right winger who isn't up to the mark just to fill a spot.I dont understand the aversion to grealish on the right. He's a complete attacker. If teams only played players in one specific position, we would not know that David silva could play out wide or that greizman would be best as a second striker. Aside from throwing 100m plus at sancho,there are not many right wing options in football and the ones at the big teams currently were all converted at one point or another. I see grealish in the di Maria mould, having the creativity and the twofootedness to play from either flanks and roam centrally if need be.
This is where the brand will help, we could overspend and take a loan out to cover the deficit and ride it out until things are back to normal and spend less in the next window.People saying this is an excuse simply don't understand the reality.
All our three income streams are taking a serious hit. Whats more, we cannot really predict future cash flows because we have no clue how long this thing will go on for.
I just don't get this opinion that Ed doesn't want to spend money? Is this the net spend conspiracy theory again?I said it 2 months ago, that Ed would use the situation to spend less. It was tongue in cheek but looks like it will come to pass
He'd be mad not to. Every club will be looking to get players on the cheap and save money given they've all taken a financial hit.I said it 2 months ago, that Ed would use the situation to spend less. It was tongue in cheek but looks like it will come to pass
I agree. But he may be of the opinion that too much expenditure right now would be a gamble. Don’t know when footy will be back, don’t know when gate receipts and match day merchandise income will be back, don’t know if sponsors will cut back or even go to the wall. I honestly wouldn’t blame him if he doesn’t spend other than a few loans of freebiesHe'd be mad not to. Every club will be looking to get players on the cheap and save money given they've all taken a financial hit.
Players can play in different positions yes.I dont understand the aversion to grealish on the right. He's a complete attacker. If teams only played players in one specific position, we would not know that David silva could play out wide or that greizman would be best as a second striker. Aside from throwing 100m plus at sancho,there are not many right wing options in football and the ones at the big teams currently were all converted at one point or another. I see grealish in the di Maria mould, having the creativity and the twofootedness to play from either flanks and roam centrally if need be.
It's a forum not a newspaper. The understanding is if you have any interest at all you'll open the thread and read the actual comments in full.Quotation marks are used to literally quote someone
This is a little misleading
Oh okMan the world is dumb as HELL what the feck is going on who needs people I hate Britain and the Queen stinks
Surely anyone reading the title can gather it's paraphrasing, given the fact that they're on the caf along with the likelihood of Woodward using those exact words?It's a forum not a newspaper. The understanding is if you have any interest at all you'll open the thread and read the actual comments in full.
United have money, and so will City, but yeah everyone else will be struggling.No one has money in the next transfer window. Clubs are struggle big time to even pay wages at the moment. There will be player exchanges, free transfers, and that's pretty much it.
Well if the values of the players have plummeted at least 20% then it makes sense that we'd spend less. Our fans constantly give Ed shit for our poor dealings in the transfer market, and getting our pants pulled down in a market that's normalised will just be embarrassing.I said it 2 months ago, that Ed would use the situation to spend less. It was tongue in cheek but looks like it will come to pass
Did you miss the part where they were in massive breach of FFP?United have money, and so will City, but yeah everyone else will be struggling.
Good point although still imagine they'll have something under the bed hidden away.Did you miss the part where they were in massive breach of FFP?
They can be sat on literal mountains of cash, but they can't spend more than they make, and now they're being done for not only spending above their means but also cooking the books. They wouldn't dare spend heavily.Good point although still imagine they'll have something under the bed hidden away.
Yes exactly.Surely anyone reading the title can gather it's paraphrasing, given the fact that they're on the caf along with the likelihood of Woodward using those exact words?
I really don't understand the confusion/complaints here by some.
Yes the market definitely projects to see transfer prices fall but this wont kick in at least for a couple months, maybe even a year when clubs are struggling to balance their books. If we ring up Dortmund today and ask for Sancho, do you think they're going to give us a Corona discount? Of course not.All clubs are going to be affected, but the rich clubs will still be rich, and the others will be in tatters.
If anything, it will be much easier to buy assets such as Sancho and Grealish, so using Covid as an excuse to make shit in the market is making a fool of the supporters yet again.
Still, the muppet in me chooses to believe EW meant we'll look to buy good players but will not overspend because it makes no sense to pay Neymar money when everyone is broken.
Its more complicated than that. Yeah we can gamble hoping that we pay 80 instead of 100. 20 mill saved seems good. But Dortmund arnt poor so they will just hold on to their asset. 20 mill potential saved could turn out to be a loss if prices recover next year plus the impact for not recruiting yet again for a position we are crying out for could loose us more than 20 in terms of league position and sales and sponsorship etc.Yes the market definitely projects to see transfer prices fall but this wont kick in at least for a couple months, maybe even a year when clubs are struggling to balance their books. If we ring up Dortmund today and ask for Sancho, do you think they're going to give us a Corona discount? Of course not.
Additionally If one expects market prices to fall then buying Sancho for 100m right before the fall happens is just bad business. Only a transfer muppet who cant keep his jimmy in its holster would do that. Ed is many things but I don't think he's lacking money sense
Complicated things can be summed up and one thing that's easy to sum up anywhere is buying big right before a projected recession is bad and unwise. The impending recession isn't just projected it's guaranteed. There's no gambling around that fact but there is planning to mitigate itIts more complicated than that. Yeah we can gamble hoping that we pay 80 instead of 100. 20 mill saved seems good. But Dortmund arnt poor so they will just hold on to their asset. 20 mill potential saved could turn out to be a loss if prices recover next year plus the impact for not recruiting yet again for a position we are crying out for could loose us more than 20 in terms of league position and sales and sponsorship etc.
Big teams take the risk. 20 mill is not going to kill us but not recruiting will have a major detriment.
There are different strategies if you are poor and if you are rich. If you are rich you start planning to take advantage of the recession. Yes save money and cut costs etc but if you can overtake your rivals by injecting cash while others are saving and selling then thats the better strategy. And thats what we should be doing.Complicated things can be summed up and one thing that's easy to sum up anywhere is buying big right before a projected recession is bad and unwise. The impending recession isn't just projected it's guaranteed. There's no gambling around that fact but there is planning to mitigate it
The problem is not their fees but their wages. If they were good enough to be interesting the big hitters then sure, they could probably take the hit but these players will be moving to mid-range clubs were their wages will be at the top end of their wage bill.Clubs still need to recruit new players and move out surplus one. So there will still be lots of movement. But swapping is more likely particularly involving expensive one.
In fact, the likes of Jones, Lingard, Smalling, being inexpensive, should be in great demand.
This/.One massive consideration is whether next season will go ahead as planned. Why would you spend huge transfer fees on players when you might not see any income for maybe a year?