Why? We should accept a manager who is statistically our worst ever in the PL era just because everyone else other than Liverpool and City are shit too? You said it yourself, we are lucky our rivals have been shit too, or else we would have no chance of top 4. Why should Ole keep his job despite being shit? Chelsea, Spurs and Arsenal's results should be irrelevant in that conversation. You're saying you would be happy for us to keep a terribly underperforming manager because our rivals are also terribly underperforming. That attitude is not going to get us back to the top.
I'm sorry mate but you're demonstrating the horrific lack of ambition that seems to be riddling our fanbase right now.
Anyone who has a basic understanding of football can see Ole is not the man to take Manchester United forward. We don't have a tactical identity. We have no patterns of play. There is no system in place. Every result we get is down to individual magic/mistakes.
And no, parking the bus and playing long ball counter attack against City and Chelsea is not a tactical identity. Anyone could do that.
It's statements like these I find puzzling.
'
Anyone who has a basic understanding of football can see Ole is not the man to take Manchester United forward'
There are plenty of individuals who have played at the highest level, with far better footballing understanding than some jokers on a football forum who disagree with you.
I get that the point you are trying to make and, again, have mentioned I'm sceptical as to whether he is the right man at the right time (numerous times tbf)...but to suggest anybody who doesn't agree outright that Ole is not capable is nonsense, and to suggest the likes of you or I have an understanding of the game sufficient to make judgement calls as such is pretty crazy.
'I'm sorry mate but you're demonstrating the horrific lack of ambition that seems to be riddling our fanbase right now'
Again, another statement I have heard time and time again. It's bullshit. The fanbase isn't riddled with anything.
There is a general acceptance from most that this club has been on the downturn since Fergie retired (with some believing the downturn in quality began a few years before...that's a seperate debate).
To think any manager was going to walk in post the absolute feck ups that the owners and decision makers made post 2013 is a little ridiculous. To think that supporters of this club aren't angry, disappointed and wanting far better is pretty disingenuous and doesn't fit in with the people I go the match with...or any United fans I communicate with on any level.
What is a common sentiment though, amongst that anger and disappointment, is that we are paying for mistakes made consistently over the last 7 years. We wasted a bucketload of money and time on shite, shite on high wages at that.
Moyes was a poor choice, LVG and Mourinho were brought in to provide instant success....it didn't happen despite winning trophies. Are we better to watch under Ole than under them? Yeah...we are in some ways...massively so? I think it's overstated tbf...
In short, there is an understanding amongst our support that this team needs rebuilding and that takes time, especially after the fiasco that's gone before.
I get that there are questions over Ole's suitability to do that...how could there not be? but to dismiss the idea totally at this stage is unfair...and again pointing to others who are of the opinion that a rebuild is going to take time as 'riddled with a lack of ambition' or some acceptance of failure just isn't accurate.
'And no, parking the bus and playing long ball counter attack against City and Chelsea is not a tactical identity. Anyone could do that'
I get what you are saying here, and whilst I enjoyed the results against Chelsea and City...
I've not necessarily enjoyed the games, tactics and gameplan. However, I said this in our 3-2 win at the Etihad a few years back and was told to 'feck off and enjoy the result'.
We won that under Mourinho because City couldn't finish that day..we should have been 4 down at half time, possibly 5. We didn't win that because of great tactics/defending it was sheer luck. We were opened up every 5 minutes!
However, under Ole we have defended better in those games...and again I think you're romanticising the past here a touch pal.
Away games in Europe under Fergie at times were a grind (remember a good few against the likes of PSV, Feyenord, Villareal, Kiev), and dire at times. People seem to think about those 99 games at Inter, Barca, Juve, Bayern and paint it as the norm...it wasn't to be fair.
The idea we used to go to Anfield or Stamford Bridge (we were regularly fecking dreadful there), even with our better sides, and play sparkling football is utter myth. I've seen plenty of smash and grab in those sorts of games. O Shea and Forlan games amongst them.
Plenty of long ball football and plenty of backs to the wall. Plenty of defending in numbers and plenty of periods without the ball.
'
You're saying you would be happy for us to keep a terribly underperforming manager because our rivals are also terribly underperforming. That attitude is not going to get us back to the top'
Nor is chopping and changing every 2 years because we've spat our dummy out again because we are not swashbuckling through the league and Europe.
'There is no system in place. Every result we get is down to individual magic/mistakes'
Every result? Really??
You've made yourself sound a little ridiculous here. You provoke those mistakes and moments of magic, in the main, because of the approach within the game. I could point to magic or individual mistakes in nearly every goal scored in most games.
Again, I don't think the general approach is perfect and share the frustration that we seem to lack the ability to change our gameplan if it's not working!
Also I'd share the thought that substitutions should be made earlier with more conviction. To say we are completely devoid of one or rely solely on hit and hope is, again, not really a fair assessment.
'We should accept a manager who is statistically our worst ever in the PL era just because everyone else other than Liverpool and City are shit too?'
He's not had a full season yet? And took over an absolute steaming pile of mediocrity tbf.
I get what you're saying, and trust me I'm livid at the state of the club. But then a good few of us have been barking that tune for alot longer than the last few years. The absolute imcompetence in which this transition has been managed is nothing short of disgraceful.
You might be right about Ole, it wouldn't come as a massive surprise to me if he doesn't go on to be a huge success here...and I'm not saying he is going to be by any stretch.
It's a big job, a proper rebuild and its been entrusted to someone without the track record appropriate some would say, and not without good cause!
I think the Klopp comparisons with Liverpool, though understandable, don't hold alot of weight.
Klopp had built a very definitive style of play and had shown fantastic ability to bring in and motivate great, consistent performances. Winning the German League with Dortmund was a huge achievement as was getting to a Champions League final all whilst developing this philosophy (hate that term but hey ho) and footballing style.
He was given time to develop that though...he was relegated with Mainz and failed to get promotion the following year. He left for Dortmund and it took him time to get them ticking...more than one full season. All the while he was developing as a manager...but you can hardly point at that as an indication of Ole's future success.
'We should accept a manager who is statistically our worst ever in the PL'
Stats are great. Statistically Liverpool won more points last season than we ever did in any of our title winning seasons...yet we've won how many since their last? Ok, the football and the consistency has paved the way for this season for them, and to be fair it's well deserved.
Ole's stats after the first 10 games in charge of a side that had been piss poor until his appointment that season were pretty much the best of any newly appointed Premier League Manager....people were ******* themselves silly. Depends over what period of time you are collecting them. Can't remember Fergie's stats being too clever first few years. Again, not a testiment to future success more a point of context in taking over a team that needed an overhaul and was severely underachieving. How long should a manager get? Guess that depends on pedigree to an extent. Again Fergie had accomplished a fair bit at Aberdeen.
Out of interest who would you see come in if Ole went end of the season? What expectations would you have? What track record? It's not a loaded question, more genuine interest.
Also, if Ole does get us 4th, or wins the Cup or Europa League how do you feel then? If we are pointing purely at statistics?