ESPN: Amorim prioritising, Pace, Power and Atheticism this summer

Attackers are the most important for sure, but I really hope we're going to be linked to some midfielders soon.

It will be a hard season if we don't improve that area.
 
It's all about balance. Arsenal can run a 34 yo Jorginho in the middle without too much trouble. And Bruno has an incredible engine.
I agree, you can carry a weakish midfielder in premier league as part of midfield 3, but Amorim seems to married to his formation.
 
I agree. We really need a good passing CM.
I would be astonished if we don't sign one, even if he's not primarily a string-puller and more of a quick, physical B2B with ball carrying and decent passing stats. Considering Ugarte was left out of the final (And didnt play today) it's not off the table that he leaves too, despite being an INEOS signing and RA's former player. Collyer can already do most of what he does, and covers ground more quickly as a pure destroyer.
 
I think everyone agrees the squad wasn’t physical enough for the PL.

The question is how can we make up 42 points? The answer is that we can’t.

It’s clear that GK and attack are the weakest areas. We are not getting Gyorkeres, even though at £58 million he’d be a bargain. It feels like Delap or bust. Can’t see anyone else, how we can spend £80 odd million on a striker that would be a risk anyway, so that rules out most.

Squad wise we are likely losing Anthony, Sancho, Rashford and possibly Gernacho.

If we get Mbueno, Cunha, Delap are we happy?

Does that start to cut the 42 points? What if we got Martinez in goal? We haven’t so far been linked to any midfielders??

I seen Eze mentioned this morning, if we lose 4 do we need 4?
 
I'd do a big bid for Camavinga if they bring in both Stiller and Nico Paz. They're always looking at the bottom line, have plenty of bodies in midfield and might be tempted with a new manager incoming.
 
I think everyone agrees the squad wasn’t physical enough for the PL.

The question is how can we make up 42 points? The answer is that we can’t.

It’s clear that GK and attack are the weakest areas. We are not getting Gyorkeres, even though at £58 million he’d be a bargain. It feels like Delap or bust. Can’t see anyone else, how we can spend £80 odd million on a striker that would be a risk anyway, so that rules out most.

Squad wise we are likely losing Anthony, Sancho, Rashford and possibly Gernacho.

If we get Mbueno, Cunha, Delap are we happy?

Does that start to cut the 42 points? What if we got Martinez in goal? We haven’t so far been linked to any midfielders??

I seen Eze mentioned this morning, if we lose 4 do we need 4?
Interestingly, we are selling our two fastest forwards in Garnacho and Rashford - physicality. Is Mbuemo and Cunha an upgrade in terms of that requirement?

Højlund has shown he has pace and strength, but everything is going wrong for him. We need two more strikers and one or two 10s and a wingback and a midfielder. All most likely physical. That’s some overhaul!
 
Interestingly, we are selling our two fastest forwards in Garnacho and Rashford - physicality. Is Mbuemo and Cunha an upgrade in terms of that requirement?

Højlund has shown he has pace and strength, but everything is going wrong for him. We need two more strikers and one or two 10s and a wingback and a midfielder. All most likely physical. That’s some overhaul!
We aren’t selling Rashford based on ability.

We are selling because he’s looked disinterested and hasn’t produced his best.
Gernacho is still at his potential stage but we need hungry hard working players that feel lucky to be at Man Utd.

As far as overhaul goes we could get three forwards and fall back on Mount/ Amad to rotate. When Amad moves up the pitch Dalot slots in. Hojilund becomes a back up and hopefully gets better/ discovers some form.
 
Interestingly, we are selling our two fastest forwards in Garnacho and Rashford - physicality. Is Mbuemo and Cunha an upgrade in terms of that requirement?

Højlund has shown he has pace and strength, but everything is going wrong for him. We need two more strikers and one or two 10s and a wingback and a midfielder. All most likely physical. That’s some overhaul!
Half Hojlund's problem is that he thinks he is the hard man, but the Premier League defenders bully the sht out of him. Im sure every team talks about that pre-game. Just rough him up and get him into battles. He will loose every time. He needs to learn to be more like a Kane. Drop off the defenders and spin into pace. Use his strengths. Speed etc. I dont know where he got this idea that he is a Mark hughes
 
I think everyone agrees the squad wasn’t physical enough for the PL.

The question is how can we make up 42 points? The answer is that we can’t.

It’s clear that GK and attack are the weakest areas. We are not getting Gyorkeres, even though at £58 million he’d be a bargain. It feels like Delap or bust. Can’t see anyone else, how we can spend £80 odd million on a striker that would be a risk anyway, so that rules out most.

Squad wise we are likely losing Anthony, Sancho, Rashford and possibly Gernacho.

If we get Mbueno, Cunha, Delap are we happy?

Does that start to cut the 42 points? What if we got Martinez in goal? We haven’t so far been linked to any midfielders??

I seen Eze mentioned this morning, if we lose 4 do we need 4?

Making 42 points is to win the league this year... its going to be a different story next season.

City, Liverpool, Arsenal all spending big money this summer will improve.

I think just changing the keeper and striker will get us 10-14 more points, because Onana and Hojlund are just like playing with 9 men.

It might actually be more because the negative impact those 2 have is so much... Onana struggled heavily on crosses (Wolves goal from corner), passing out the back which we conceded a few and just the worst shot stopper in the league... (MGW goal at OT). So a keeper that can be average at all aspects of keeping will definitely gain us more points.

With the striker, we have seen when Zirkzee plays, we are better offensively because of the fact that he can hold up the ball to his feet rather than Hojlund which is a bouncing board. So when we build up from the back and need to play a progressive pass, when its Hojlund, most instances the ball is coming back and we are defending… these are small margins but a striker with better control keeps the possession and we are in control of the game.

Add Cunha, we have struggled heavily in progressing play, Cunha is perfect for this, he receives the ball so well and can dribble his way out of trouble. We have seen that from Amad down the right but Cunha is more effective currently in the PL.

I can see us making 20 points from those signings, and another 10 due to confidence and better coaching.
 
Thank you chaps for your responses and generous praise. I agree with everything you said. Heaven certainly has the tools, I just worry about putting too much responsibility on a player so young, something we’ve done too much of over the last couple of years. But I agree he has the tools, at least potentially. It’s an interesting point about the lack of European football next season and the potential to let Heaven step up. I need to digest that thought properly because I respond.

Thank you mate. And yes on Barella. He’s been my ideal midfielder for United for a good few years. It’s amazing how underappreciated he is, because he’s world class without a doubt. I actually had an argument with a poster not too long ago, who was adamant that Barella couldn’t be considered a “technically proficient” midfielder. Mind boggling.

Thank you.

Mathias Sammer is on of my favourite players of all time. He married an incredible no fuss, efficient, physically dominant style, to technical mastery, grace, and a deep understanding of the game around him. He used to drive forwards from the libero position and play as an auxiliary CM, and although he was powerful, he still somewhat glided over the ground. As a young man I was absolutely enamoured with the way he played and the positions he took up. Putting him in the team was almost like getting two players, a brilliant defender and a graceful midfielder. Honestly, in this era he would’ve been absolute gold dust when you consider the premium on playing out from the back.

With regards to the 3 at the back, it’s nature is neither defensive nor offensive. Not inherently. It’s all about personnel. I’ve argued this for a long time. If you play the system with two traditional wingbacks, it’s defensive. If you play the system with one wingback and one winger, it’s well balanced. If you play it with two wingers, it’s extremely attacking. Amorim has been limited by his main three options being Mazroui, Dorgu and Dalot. 2 are natural defenders, and the other is a wingback. It’s only when Amad plays there that you start to see its potential.

In terms of evolving our performances, recruitment at wingback is going to be vital. Of all the positions, getting a winger to play RWB is probably the one position that will change the shape and threat of the team more than any other.

If you gave me unlimited money and a CM style edit feature so players would all want to come to me, I wouldn’t play a natural defenders on either wing back slot, because that belies what this system is actually designed to be. I’d have a hard working wide midfielder on one side and a straight up winger on the other. These aren’t supposed to a case of “it is what is says on the tin”. The wing back label is a default moniker, a hypothesis underlined by the personnel Amorim used there in his time at Sporting. He had Quenda on the right who is a left footed, out and out winger. People picking defenders for this role are changing the entire system, and it’s a big reason why we’ve struggled going forwards this season, we just can’t create the needed overloads. We are losing at least one proper attacking player in the final third.

My dream would be Nico Williams as the “LWB”, and Federico Valverde as thee “RWB”. You’ve got the pacey inverted winger on one side and the industrious technically gifted midfielder on the other, who can easily make a significant defensive contribution (he’s played full back for Real many times). He’s also really dangerous going forwards and is very quick. Obviously we’ll never get either, but they are the dream. The only “defender” I’ve seen that would work in this system as one of the WBs is Alphonso Davies. And that’s because he’s a sort of hybrid full back/winger. I suppose Frimpong potentially could work too, but I genuinely think we need to sign a winger, rather than all the talk of looking for a wingback. We have our hybrid, industrious wide midfielder in Dorgu, already. He’s young and will need time to come good. On the other flank we need an outright winger or at worst a player of the profile of Valverde. If we sign a player who is even slightly more defensively inclined, we are not solving the problem.
Great post.

Completely agree on the discussion around 3ATB and 'wingbacks'. People worry that the role is too defensive and that no good winger would actually want to play there, but you only need to watch a few of our games to see how offensive the role is in Amorim's side (to the point that it's almost misleading to refer to it as wingback in any sense other than starting position). I imagine players like Perisic and Willian would have suited the role massively (even as the hard-working midfielder, as you call it).

If the worry is that buying for this side will leave us inflexible in the scenario that we move on from Amorim, I think a team like this (players used are just examples):


Garcia
Mazraoui - de Ligt - Yoro
Amad - Ugarte - Wharton - Dorgu
Cherki -------- Cunha
Gyökeres

Could easily turn into this:

Garcia
Mazraoui/Dalot - De Ligt - Yoro - Dorgu
Ugarte - Wharton
Amad - Cherki - Cunha
Gyökeres
I can't say I'm at all convinced by Amorim, but if planning for him and a future beyond him is the plan, then this doesn't look too bad. Ugarte would be the next player to upgrade. Maybe Mainoo (or later down the line, Kone) will eventually step up.
 
Last edited:
Surely Amorim and the INEOS best in class team understand that adding pace, power and athleticism to the attack does nothing to stop teams cutting through our midfield and bullying our defenders.
 
Surely Amorim and the INEOS best in class team understand that adding pace, power and athleticism to the attack does nothing to stop teams cutting through our midfield and bullying our defenders.
“Does nothing”? Hard disagree on that one.
 
Surely Amorim and the INEOS best in class team understand that adding pace, power and athleticism to the attack does nothing to stop teams cutting through our midfield and bullying our defenders.

“Does nothing”? Hard disagree on that one.
True. We conceded 54 in the league.
Liverpool 41, City 44, Newcastle 47, Villa 51.

We scored 44, Liverpool 82, City 72, Newcastle 68 and Villa 58.

How we can and will concede 13 less goals. New keeper. Martinez back, Yoro and Heaven in their second year and will be stronger. Shaw???? (Doubtful)
The Onana factor is massive, the defence has zero confidence in him.

Ugarte in his second year.

More importantly: if we press from the front with Pace and Power, teams won’t attack as much. If we are capable of scoring at will with a strong attack, the fear factor comes back. We have plenty of possession but we did nothing with it. We need the cutting edge. This will also bring confidence. This will take time.
 
True. We conceded 54 in the league.
Liverpool 41, City 44, Newcastle 47, Villa 51.

We scored 44, Liverpool 82, City 72, Newcastle 68 and Villa 58.

How we can and will concede 13 less goals. New keeper. Martinez back, Yoro and Heaven in their second year and will be stronger. Shaw???? (Doubtful)
The Onana factor is massive, the defence has zero confidence in him.

Ugarte in his second year.

More importantly: if we press from the front with Pace and Power, teams won’t attack as much. If we are capable of scoring at will with a strong attack, the fear factor comes back. We have plenty of possession but we did nothing with it. We need the cutting edge. This will also bring confidence. This will take time.
It’s not about goals conceded. It’s about being able to control matches or at the very least not being bullied in the middle of the park. Defending from the front is great and all but while our midfield and defense is severely lacking in pace, power and athleticism we will still get overrun by good teams never mind top ones.
 
It’s not about goals conceded. It’s about being able to control matches or at the very least not being bullied in midfield the middle of the park. Defending from the front is great and all but while our midfield and defense is severely lacking in pace, power and athleticism we will still get overrun by good teams never mind top ones.
We all witnessed this when Casimeiro partnered Erickson. We do have pace on defence with Yoro and Heaven and power with De Ligt when fit and Martinez when in top form (which wasn’t often enough last year). I am hoping for more from Ugarte and Mainoo and hoping we sign a midfielder. It’s hard as we can’t do it all.
 
True. We conceded 54 in the league.
Liverpool 41, City 44, Newcastle 47, Villa 51.

We scored 44, Liverpool 82, City 72, Newcastle 68 and Villa 58.

How we can and will concede 13 less goals. New keeper. Martinez back, Yoro and Heaven in their second year and will be stronger. Shaw???? (Doubtful)
The Onana factor is massive, the defence has zero confidence in him.

Ugarte in his second year.

More importantly: if we press from the front with Pace and Power, teams won’t attack as much. If we are capable of scoring at will with a strong attack, the fear factor comes back. We have plenty of possession but we did nothing with it. We need the cutting edge. This will also bring confidence. This will take time.

I think going ahead in games more often, having that confidence we can get a goal, helps you defensively.

That's the problem with stats, they can't quantify the impact of being ahead or behind in terms of players mindset and emotions.

This United team knows if it doesn't take any early chances it gets they likely won't score and you can see that panic set in around the 30 min mark of games.
 
Surely Amorim and the INEOS best in class team understand that adding pace, power and athleticism to the attack does nothing to stop teams cutting through our midfield and bullying our defenders.
But our defence, barring the clown in nets, isn't the problem. Yes we give away soft goals, but generally we're not a bad defensive side.

The issue is our lack of goals. Goals change games, and the ability to score a lot of goals gets you out of all sorts of trouble. For us, conceding one goal is a disaster because there's a real chance that's the game gone. If Liverpool, say, concede a goal, it's game on.
 
It’s not about goals conceded. It’s about being able to control matches or at the very least not being bullied in midfield the middle of the park. Defending from the front is great and all but while our midfield and defense is severely lacking in pace, power and athleticism we will still get overrun by good teams never mind top ones.

The whole point of Amorims system is to control position from the back. Name me the game where we’ve been overrun?

I get the push for midfielders as a fanbase we just love a controller in the middle of the park. We ask for it every summer. The problem is it’s not important to Amorim’s system and we can easily control games with the current midfield we have (I know nobody wants to hear this, neither do I). What we really need to invest in is goals.
 
We aren’t selling Rashford based on ability.

We are selling because he’s looked disinterested and hasn’t produced his best.
Gernacho is still at his potential stage but we need hungry hard working players that feel lucky to be at Man Utd.

As far as overhaul goes we could get three forwards and fall back on Mount/ Amad to rotate. When Amad moves up the pitch Dalot slots in. Hojilund becomes a back up and hopefully gets better/ discovers some form.
I get that, but we still rid ourselves of a couple of our few pacy players, so by replacing them we don’t really add much pace per se.
 
Half Hojlund's problem is that he thinks he is the hard man, but the Premier League defenders bully the sht out of him. Im sure every team talks about that pre-game. Just rough him up and get him into battles. He will loose every time. He needs to learn to be more like a Kane. Drop off the defenders and spin into pace. Use his strengths. Speed etc. I dont know where he got this idea that he is a Mark hughes
Agree with this, but then players also need to stop playing those balls to him

I remember Ferguson telling Rafael to not go into headers against Bale; he would only lose and set Bale up for a head start - focus on the ground duels. And he normally did well against him.
 
Half Hojlund's problem is that he thinks he is the hard man, but the Premier League defenders bully the sht out of him. Im sure every team talks about that pre-game. Just rough him up and get him into battles. He will loose every time. He needs to learn to be more like a Kane. Drop off the defenders and spin into pace. Use his strengths. Speed etc. I dont know where he got this idea that he is a Mark hughes

It’s like he’s spent the whole season trying to improve his weaknesses. So he’s just endlessly exposed his weaknesses.
 
I get that, but we still rid ourselves of a couple of our few pacy players, so by replacing them we don’t really add much pace per se.
We do because, Sancho, Rashford and Anthony have not really been there since after the first month (Sancho never) under Amorim.

Secondly Sancho and Anthony have never really done it consistently in the PL.

One of the things about the players we are been linked with Mbuemo and Cunha and Delap is that they are scoring here in England and I feel that’s important. As for Rashford he’s got the ability but unfortunately he’ll retire having never fulfilled his potential. The Barca/PSG bench won’t be a nice place.
 
Surely Amorim and the INEOS best in class team understand that adding pace, power and athleticism to the attack does nothing to stop teams cutting through our midfield and bullying our defenders.

But it does. If you can press higher up the pitch and win the ball back with your attack then that will help the midfield and defence.
 
We all witnessed this when Casimeiro partnered Erickson. We do have pace on defence with Yoro and Heaven and power with De Ligt when fit and Martinez when in top form (which wasn’t often enough last year). I am hoping for more from Ugarte and Mainoo and hoping we sign a midfielder. It’s hard as we can’t do it all.
We were running out Casemiro and Ugarte in front of three centerbacks with two fullbacks playing wingback for months and still leaking goals. We conceded four to Lyon while they were down a man. And apparently Bruno will be a full-time midfielder next season because we are spending big money on players in his best position rather than balancing the squad. The lack of funds you rightly allude to only makes the allocation of those funds that much more crucial.
But our defence, barring the clown in nets, isn't the problem. Yes we give away soft goals, but generally we're not a bad defensive side.

The issue is our lack of goals. Goals change games, and the ability to score a lot of goals gets you out of all sorts of trouble. For us, conceding one goal is a disaster because there's a real chance that's the game gone. If Liverpool, say, concede a goal, it's game on.
See above. Despite lining up with a overly defensive setup we were still giving away cheap goals on the regular. And the current strategy looks likely to make the spine of the team even weaker.
But it does. If you can press higher up the pitch and win the ball back with your attack then that will help the midfield and defence.
Except we don’t have enough collective pace at CB to press high up the pitch. As long as one or two of De Ligt, Martinéz and Maguire are starting we can’t do it.