Yes, and unless you have a reason to receive asylum, you do not receive asylum. You do not receive an asylum as an economic migrant in any European country, instead, you are sent back.true and agree , the point here is that many other then syrians are jumping on the bandwagon and seeking asylum . witch is bad because slows the process for the syrians , germany has a backlog witch can take a year , or takes a place of a syrian
......
Answer these:
1. Where are you from?
2. Where do you reside?
3. Do you live in the same town as your great grandparents do?
feck me this guy even puts migrants to shame.born in romania but hungarian nationality . also have hungarian citizenship and living in munich
Disturbing ? He himself posted those info on this fecking forum and it literally take a minute to quote those.Awesome work, people! We determined that one guy's nationality, citizenship, country of origin and current (as of 2013) country of residence! And it's not disturbing at all!
That's great, good to see.
Maybe a dude using the online handle 'naturalized' shouldn't be commenting, but this made me laugh......
Happened again today that a group of asylum seekers refused to get off the bus at their assigned asylum housing here in Sweden. Too far away from hospital, school and grocery store apparently. People in the village must be disappointed to hear it's not good enough even for people coming from a war zone.
Hypocrite.fecking creep
yeah i'm the same ,got to the border and shouted allahakbar till they let me in .
I think that's unfair.Hypocrite.
He's been way more unfair to these other migrants.I think that's unfair.
There's a huge difference between applying for residency or citizenship through legal procedures and crossing borders illegally, especially in the 100,000s. If one travels to the US without a visa he/she get stopped at the immigration desk and sent home. Racism? Nationalism? Britain First? Nothing but simple rule of law.
European countries have every right to defend their borders from illegal entrance. Moreover, it would be highly irresponsible from any administration to open its country's borders and allow uncontrolled migration.
Well said.He's been way more unfair to these other migrants.
I think he's a hypocrite the ways he's been going on in here and if anything these people need it more than him as he's just an economic migrant which obviously are all horrible people.
I see where holy red is coming from but the fact is Botond hasn't just been talking in terms of legality, from what I've seen in here he's been trying to smear a whole bunch of desperate people with often misleading and sometimes factually incorrect propaganda.Well said.
@botond is an economic migrant calling out other economic migrants for being economic migrants. It's economic migrant-ception. I don't think they're economic migrants myself, they are refugees. It's just a bit double standards/hypocritical him saying that for this thread.
Trust hr red to try and change this around, as always.
nazi swedes make refugees walk to the supermarket
Norway it is then, you fecking cruel Swedes.
It's not legality alone though. There's also an economic cost to assimilation of so many people. Judging by the stats in their countries of origin it would be reasonable to assume many of them would not be qualified enough to settle smoothly in the European job market. The numbers involved don't make it any easier, and I think that dismissing the cultural differences is also hypocritical. Accusation of racism when people point at the real security issues is both unfair and dishonest.I see where holy red is coming from but the fact is Botond hasn't just been talking in terms of legality, from what I've seen in here he's been trying to smear a whole bunch of desperate people with often misleading and sometimes factually incorrect propaganda.
just ignore , your a left wing nazi if you dare to point out some of those issuesIt's not legality alone though. There's also an economic cost to assimilation of so many people. Judging by the stats in their countries of origin it would be reasonable to assume many of them would not be qualified enough to settle smoothly in the European job market. The numbers involved don't make it any easier, and I think that dismissing the cultural differences is also hypocritical. Accusation of racism when people point at the real security issues is both unfair and dishonest.
There is an economic cost and also an economic opportunity especially for countries like Germany with an increasing average age.It's not legality alone though. There's also an economic cost to assimilation of so many people. Judging by the stats in their countries of origin it would be reasonable to assume many of them would not be qualified enough to settle smoothly in the European job market. The numbers involved don't make it any easier, and I think that dismissing the cultural differences is also hypocritical. Accusation of racism when people point at the real security issues is both unfair and dishonest.
Addressing these issues objectively is a far bigger challenge than calling a person for a career move.
yeah tell those 54 sharia law districts in swedenThere is an economic cost and also an economic opportunity especially for countries like Germany with an increasing average age.
The assimilation stuff is vastly overblown.
First paragraph of this article (ignoring that a blog written by an American living in Sweden isn't the best source anyway):yeah tell those 54 sharia law districts in sweden
http://swedenreport.org/2014/10/29/swedish-police-55-official-no-go-zones/
What? Are you being purposefully dense? These are engineers, teachers, well to do people who've had to abandon everything, including 90% of their wealth in order to preserve their life. I don't know what kind of backwards idea you have of these people, that they're all born and raised in a gutter or something? They are educated, professionals, and now because of Bashar and IS, they've had to leave all of what they've accumulated and owned so that they can live to see another day. So, stop talking shite.It's not legality alone though. There's also an economic cost to assimilation of so many people. Judging by the stats in their countries of origin it would be reasonable to assume many of them would not be qualified enough to settle smoothly in the European job market. The numbers involved don't make it any easier, and I think that dismissing the cultural differences is also hypocritical. Accusation of racism when people point at the real security issues is both unfair and dishonest.
Addressing these issues objectively is a far bigger challenge than calling a person for a career move.
It would only be natural if recently immigrated (or even second generation) European Muslims and Christian European varied in opinion on how overblown that issue was.There is an economic cost and also an economic opportunity especially for countries like Germany with an increasing average age.
The assimilation stuff is vastly overblown.
You'll have to expand on that point.It would only be natural if recently immigrated (or even second generation) European Muslims and Christian European varied in opinion on how overblown that issue was.
European Muslims are more likely to favour mass immigration of Muslims to Europe. European Christians are more likely to be nervous about the cultural differences, and changing demographics.You'll have to expand on that point.
only 50% percent is syrian and the % is falling ,http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/regional.php, give asylum to the syrians with controlled registration , no problem , leave eu broder open for uncontrolled and unregistered mass migration is a no goWhat? Are you being purposefully dense? These are engineers, teachers, well to do people who've had to abandon everything, including 90% of their wealth in order to preserve their life. I don't know what kind of backwards idea you have of these people, that they're all born and raised in a gutter or something? They are educated, professionals, and now because of Bashar and IS, they've had to leave all of what they've accumulated and owned so that they can live to see another day. So, stop talking shite.
So? These are secular countries.European Muslims are more likely to favour mass immigration of Muslims to Europe. European Christians are more likely to be nervous about the cultural differences, and changing demographics.
Watch out they have muslamic ray guns too.just ignore , your a left wing nazi if you dare to point out some of those issues
its not the cost of assimilation because there is little assimilation if any at all , when the belief is above the state law\constitution . the cultural differences are to big
You haven't addressed what I said - my point still stands. hr red is talking shite about them not being able to hold down a job in the 'European market' which is absolute nonsense. As if teaching algebra is suddenly harder once you cross a border into Europe. It's just nonsense.only 50% percent is syrian and the % is falling ,http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/regional.php, give asylum to the syrians with controlled registration , no problem , leave eu broder open for uncontrolled and unregistered mass migration is a no go
I was referring to varying opinions here rather than the official policies of European countries. Despite being officially secular, I would expect these to democratically reflect the worries of many among the Christian majority. These worries are a mix of cultural, economic and security issues.So? These are secular countries.
Botond is not engaging in an honest discussion he's posting regularly misleading propaganda and he's a massive hypocrite.I was referring to varying opinions here rather than the official policies of European countries. Despite being officially secular, I would expect these to democratically reflect the worries of many among the Christian majority. These worries are a mix of cultural, economic and security issues.
Is there a racist element involved? I'm sure there is, and some would oppose the integration of Muslims even there were only a couple of dozens of them. Since we're talking about potentially millions of people I think this warrants an honest discussion/debate rather than calling people names and digging their biographies for cheap shots.
My in-laws are Romanian. They deserve every ounce of suspicion for Mămăligă alone.A lot of people are unfairly suspicious of Romanians too, should we take heed of their bigotry (botondry)?
I am really uncomfortable with this argument for various reasons. It links the acceptance of refugees to their economic value. That is inherently against the idea of seeking asylum. The acceptance of refugees derives from their situation of need -the physical danger in their homeland- and not from anything else.There is an economic cost and also an economic opportunity especially for countries like Germany with an increasing average age.
The assimilation stuff is vastly overblown.
So you actually ignored that @botond , I for one am surprisedFirst paragraph of this article (ignoring that a blog written by an American living in Sweden isn't the best source anyway):yeah tell those 54 sharia law districts in sweden
http://swedenreport.org/2014/10/29/swedish-police-55-official-no-go-zones/
"It should also be made clear that this report refers to criminal gangs seizing control; the kind of shariah-ruled, muslim-only enclaves Steve Emerson was talking about in Britain and France do not exist in Sweden"
But hey, keep up your selective posting of videos in this thread, great contribution and all that...