Neo_Mufc
Full Member
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2009
- Messages
- 10,162
I'm only speculating because they are a sugar daddy club.Monaco? Doesn't seem like they belong? Maybe I'm not up to date on their history though
A few people keep repeating this about it being a media line that it's the death of football. No sorry, for many of us this would indeed be the deathknell of the game for us, at least as supporters of these teams.I don't like the exclusivity, but I think that will be fixed overtime like it was with the European cup. Let's be honest, even in terms of internationals, UEFA has never shown regard for top clubs. Look at the UEFA Nations League nonsense, who did they consult. Its a power game between UEFA and top clubs, if the FA wants to get involved they can too, as they constantly overreach in terms of punishments and refereeing. Remember how poorly they handled the Cavani incident. The level of arrogance they keep showing towards manager fines for complaints. This is a power play and the media acting like this is the death of football is a narrative.
I'm sure a communistic league would go swimmingly!I hate capitalism.
So you have no problem with how arbitrary this is? 15 clubs decide in 2021 that they are exclusive, they get to form a Super League where they'll never relegate. The other clubs can go feck themselves.You're right. Oh how I saw Arsenal fans mocked for celebrating top 4. I think suggestions that the players will just not bother is absurd.
It's actually showing a lot of fans up. Very few seem to be making genuine arguments about why it's bad for other clubs, I'm not actually seeing any real meat to why it's bad. It's just a giant toddler tantrum at the moment, there's almost no actual discussion. Just posts containing no more than 'I feel like I've been stabbed in the heart'.
People have fallen for the broadcaster rage hook, line and sinker. Neville didn't make any actual points either and I think everyone is just copying him and others like him because he's managed to get them seething and angry at 'the man'.
I actually feel the standard of punditry on this has been a disgrace. Lots of one liners and clichés, no actual derails or substance as to why its bad, not even the remote entertainment that it could be good and that's how you know they are being dishonest. Such a transparent kick off because some very rich people are worried. Rio on BT rambled almost the exact same thing as Neville and not in a good way, not in a 'these guys have points' here way. Rio seemed like he was struggling to remember what he'd been told to say and fell back on just saying what he'd heard Gary say. The broadcasters are shitting themselves and it's for the same greedy reasons that those who want the super league, want the super league. It's not because of the fans, they've been fleecing the fans for years. Sky have been suckling 'the soul' from football for you ars. Propping up the top clubs etc, doing everything they are ranting about now. This is an act of defence and fans have lapped it up.
There are potential positives to at least talk about, there are concerns to be had but its impossible to have a proper discussion amongst all the melodrama.
Oh really? What about when Roman waltzed in some 18 years ago and bought half the planet? Or spent 200 million last year?A few people keep repeating this about it being a media line that it's the death of football. No sorry, for many of us this would indeed be the deathknell of the game for us, at least as supporters of these teams.
Yep and for once, I’m thankful a populist like Boris is in charge because he’s going to eat with pleasure the Glazers and co when he will learn the people don’t want those breakaway leagues, especially since he needs to amend for the Brexit and COVID disasters.Im amazed that most people are totally ignorant about this. Specially the british parliament, since there's no written constitution the parliament itself is the sovereign and pass any law it wanted to.
Yep and for once, I’m thankful a populist like Boris is in charge because he’s going to eat with pleasure the Glazers and co when he will learn the people don’t want those breakaway leagues, especially since he needs to amend for the Brexit and COVID disasters.
The irony of a Chelsea supporter writing this, not to mention the outcry from the UK of all places. I don't want to play the "blame game" but the EPL is THE league who super charged the commercialization of football and people constantly defended constructs like Chelsea, City etc. as well as the various club takeovers of rich owners. Just take a look at which league still spent insane money despite Corona going on....A few people keep repeating this about it being a media line that it's the death of football. No sorry, for many of us this would indeed be the deathknell of the game for us, at least as supporters of these teams.
I think you are overestimating rather...I truly think we are underestimating what the UK government can do here, if the bulk of the population hates this idea.
I just have a feeling he’s not getting much money from a ESL anyway so why not? The point is that he’s unpredictable and that’s good in that situation.
You know that he's a tory right? Money before anything.
I guess we might see.I think you are overestimating rather...
I've been trying to say this all night! Why do players bother for Southampton? Sheffield United? Birmingham City? Preston North End?Well said.
The other obvious point is that league games being “meaningless” if you weren’t in the title chase or threatened with relegation is...how football worked for a very very long time. And yet players still played hard, fans enjoyed the sport, and the sky didn’t fall.
You're underestimating the fact that the tories and Johnson's goverment especially have been trying to Americanize the UK's political environment for years. This was probably part of the American trade deal.I truly think we are underestimating what the UK government can do here, if the bulk of the population hates this idea.
- At the same time, if, say Leicester or Everton, were to qualify and actually win it - despite everything being skewed against them - they would earn around half the amount Barca or Real would be guaranteed JUST FOR COMPETING IN THE GROUP STAGE. Essentially this has been devised by a cabal of greedy, stupid and desperate individuals who care nothing about football, competitiveness or the sustainability of the game.
I do have a problem with the exclusivity. I don't like it. It's anti competition, it would create a whole lot of dead rubbers, and it could create a bubble where someone like us or Arsenal are really just shit and we just end up being a relegation fighting PL club still getting thrashed in the SL in a few years.So you have no problem with how arbitrary this is? 15 clubs decide in 2021 that they are exclusive, they get to form a Super League where they'll never relegate. The other clubs can go feck themselves.
Would you have agreed with a Super League in 1980 including Nottingham Forest who had won back-to-back European Cups?
I can't go that far down the rabbit hole....You're underestimating the fact that the tories and Johnson's goverment especially have been trying to Americanize the UK's political environment for years. This was probably part of the American trade deal.
It's basically the Cosa Nostra.Taken from James Corbett on twitter, who claims to have seen a copy of the "Super League Document".
- The plan would guarantee massive income to a 15 club elite and cement financial gaps not only between those competing in the Super league and those not, but within it. The plan envisages one off payments of up to €350 million to the fifteen founder members, but only six clubs would receive the full amount with five of the initial members receiving just €100 or €112.5 million.
- The 15 breakaway clubs have generously deigned to allow 5 merit based qualifiers each season. But the system is totally skewed against them. They have no say in running the Super League and are entirely excluded from a commercial pot worth 15% of income. Moreover, there is an 'equal' share of revenue that is not equal at all. The qualifiers are excluded from half of this pot of money (worth around €1.85 BILLION)
- At the same time, the organisers have shown their contempt for rewarding sporting success. You get given a ton of money for playing (about €180m for the group stage), but prize money is quite small - worth perhaps €30m extra for winning it. Which is small change, really. If you win the Champions League, by contrast, you earn about €120million - or 300% more than just making the group stage
- At the same time, if, say Leicester or Everton, were to qualify and actually win it - despite everything being skewed against them - they would earn around half the amount Barca or Real would be guaranteed JUST FOR COMPETING IN THE GROUP STAGE. Essentially this has been devised by a cabal of greedy, stupid and desperate individuals who care nothing about football, competitiveness or the sustainability of the game. It will kill domestic football and create a boring spectacle skewed in favour of a Super League 'big 6
It could be played on an aircraft carrier out in the Pacific Ocean.Hey- what makes you think that all the games will actually be played in Europe ?
The Super League final could be played in New York, Miami or Beijing
JesusTaken from James Corbett on twitter, who claims to have seen a copy of the "Super League Document".
- The plan would guarantee massive income to a 15 club elite and cement financial gaps not only between those competing in the Super league and those not, but within it. The plan envisages one off payments of up to €350 million to the fifteen founder members, but only six clubs would receive the full amount with five of the initial members receiving just €100 or €112.5 million.
- The 15 breakaway clubs have generously deigned to allow 5 merit based qualifiers each season. But the system is totally skewed against them. They have no say in running the Super League and are entirely excluded from a commercial pot worth 15% of income. Moreover, there is an 'equal' share of revenue that is not equal at all. The qualifiers are excluded from half of this pot of money (worth around €1.85 BILLION)
- At the same time, the organisers have shown their contempt for rewarding sporting success. You get given a ton of money for playing (about €180m for the group stage), but prize money is quite small - worth perhaps €30m extra for winning it. Which is small change, really. If you win the Champions League, by contrast, you earn about €120million - or 300% more than just making the group stage
- At the same time, if, say Leicester or Everton, were to qualify and actually win it - despite everything being skewed against them - they would earn around half the amount Barca or Real would be guaranteed JUST FOR COMPETING IN THE GROUP STAGE. Essentially this has been devised by a cabal of greedy, stupid and desperate individuals who care nothing about football, competitiveness or the sustainability of the game. It will kill domestic football and create a boring spectacle skewed in favour of a Super League 'big 6
If this is indeed true, and it's a big if, I can't see it going forward and actually becoming a thing. Absolute disgrace.Taken from James Corbett on twitter, who claims to have seen a copy of the "Super League Document".
- The plan would guarantee massive income to a 15 club elite and cement financial gaps not only between those competing in the Super league and those not, but within it. The plan envisages one off payments of up to €350 million to the fifteen founder members, but only six clubs would receive the full amount with five of the initial members receiving just €100 or €112.5 million.
- The 15 breakaway clubs have generously deigned to allow 5 merit based qualifiers each season. But the system is totally skewed against them. They have no say in running the Super League and are entirely excluded from a commercial pot worth 15% of income. Moreover, there is an 'equal' share of revenue that is not equal at all. The qualifiers are excluded from half of this pot of money (worth around €1.85 BILLION)
- At the same time, the organisers have shown their contempt for rewarding sporting success. You get given a ton of money for playing (about €180m for the group stage), but prize money is quite small - worth perhaps €30m extra for winning it. Which is small change, really. If you win the Champions League, by contrast, you earn about €120million - or 300% more than just making the group stage
- At the same time, if, say Leicester or Everton, were to qualify and actually win it - despite everything being skewed against them - they would earn around half the amount Barca or Real would be guaranteed JUST FOR COMPETING IN THE GROUP STAGE. Essentially this has been devised by a cabal of greedy, stupid and desperate individuals who care nothing about football, competitiveness or the sustainability of the game. It will kill domestic football and create a boring spectacle skewed in favour of a Super League 'big 6
You do realise that the PL is threatening legal action against all of these teams so think the drama is warrantedso many drama queens on this, they are just proposing to replace midweek CL football with a new super league, the sky isn't falling down.
If Fred is playing then they need a separate ship to store all the balls to replace the ones lost in sea.It could be played on an aircraft carrier out in the Pacific Ocean.
Don't be ridiculous. Ole has played him this year in games fans themselves have gone mad about because it's a dead rubber or he should be rested for the next game.Rashford will be on the bench rested by the manager to preserve him for the super league game midweek.
You underestimate how stubborn we can be.We can all say we won't watch but it's football. C'mon which one of you weak ass football slave will be strong enough to resist ? Curiosity will get the best of most of you (myself included)
What's exciting about it? It's just a business move from these clubs because they wanted more money than that offered by UEFA. It's a competition with no relegation and every team will receive ton of money regardless of results. Whoever wins it won't matter much for these clubs boards. The target is achieved.I do have a problem with the exclusivity. I don't like it. It's anti competition, it would create a whole lot of dead rubbers, and it could create a bubble where someone like us or Arsenal are really just shit and we just end up being a relegation fighting PL club still getting thrashed in the SL in a few years.
Also don't like that non-permanent winners would get way less of a prize money. Also, we don't yet know any criteria by which the rotating members will be both promoted and relegated. All of that is in flux.
That being said, if this is going to go ahead, it doesn't necessarily have to necessarily stay that way. Sure there are permanent members now, but over time if certain members hold the other clubs down they'll be cut off. Similarly if clubs outside the SL become really successful and possibly rise out of the shadows of the traditional big clubs and become "big" themselves, they'll be invited in. After all when the original European Cup started it was also quite exclusive. That changed over time, so this could too.
Overall, I'm not happy about this, but I think people are being a bit dramatic about the "end of football" thing. I think you could actually look forward to this massive restructuring of football as possibly an exciting thing.