European Super League

Do you want the ESL to happen?


  • Total voters
    1,921
  • Poll closed .

Pep's Suit

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
1,705
Well a lot of clubs hit the wall in how much they can increase their income so I understand why they want this (Italian clubs and Barca once they lose Messi) but clearly this is from Perez + US owners of PL clubs who have different ideas about sports. And to some extent I can't blame them. They need £600m income for £15m profit. That's absolutely ridiculous but maybe instead they should have worked towards wages limit because let's be honest 95% of players are idiots, no chance they could get a job where they earn even 2-3% of their current wages.
 

Devil_forever

You're only young once, you can be immature f'ever
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
11,010
Location
Head of the naval division of lolibfascon
What happened to all the talk of kicking us out? Why offer the clubs a way back? Could it be, that without Real, Barca, United, Liverpool and Juve, your product (let’s be real that’s what the CL and EL are to UEFA) is worthless to TV and sponsors?

This is the same gutless UEFA that’s allowed City and PSG to circumvent FFP with ease and showed the world that in court, they couldn’t even enforce their own rules.
 

wilkie1990

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 2, 2019
Messages
25
So the founding teams never get relegated or removed from the league regardless of performance. Whats to stop them just sending out the reserves each time and collecting the paycheck? What are the goals for the players? Winning the league and the champions league? Not anymore dont need to worry about winning the league or finishing top 4 as they are guarenteed into the ESL each season. Imagine United sitting 7th in the League at Xmas, whats the incentive for the players to go out and put everything on the line each week? Then the money associated with it all as well, the rest of the league cant compete with the sums these teams are allegedly making. Then for any future transfers the price will be extorinate for these super clubs (and arsenal).
I would highly doubt they would be sending reserve teams out, they dont do that in the champions league so why would they start in its replacement? The Super League would not be happy with that, as it would have an affect on the money coming in, so that would simply not happen. The goals for the players would be the same as they are when participating in the champions league, to win the competition. Teams and players are not suddenly going to not care or not want to win the league just because they are in a new european competition. The league will be just as important as ever. Teams that are not founder teams will want a piece of the pie if this does go ahead, so will do all they can on the field to qualify. People seem to skip past the fact that there are open spots for teams to qualify and participate in this competition.

Personally, I think if this does go ahead, we will see some rework to the openness of the competition to appease fans.
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
I doubt that as it seems Woody and the Glaziers are apparently running the show. United pulls out and it’s all over, so yeah I hope they do.
I have no doubt that the Glazers are in contact with FSG. These are major franchise owners in the USA. They have to have held talks
 

FrankDrebin

Don't call me Shirley
Joined
Aug 25, 2019
Messages
20,471
Location
Police Squad
Supports
USA Manchester Red Socks
Joel Glazer and Perez are like dogs with a bone. They wont give this up and the others will gain confidence from that. The b*stards.
 

Pep's Suit

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 7, 2013
Messages
1,705
They know this collapses without the English clubs. City and Chelsea will drop out I think.
Yeah, City and Chelsea only joined because they didn't want to be left behind and also looks like Atleti don't like this much.
 

Devil_forever

You're only young once, you can be immature f'ever
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
11,010
Location
Head of the naval division of lolibfascon
I doubt that as it seems Woody and the Glaziers are apparently running the show. United pulls out and it’s all over, so yeah I hope they do.
The Glazers have shown that public opinion isn’t something that will sway them, I can’t imagine any owners dealing with the amount of abuse they got from 2005-2012 and still being here but they are. If anyone blinks first it won’t be them.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,816
I'm no admirer of UEFA and I thought their plans for the CL were stupid and they clearly didn't address what the big clubs/markets needed. They did indeed forget who is paying for the party. That said, this SL concept is far worse.
Thing is, I can't really think of a realistic CL reform that would appease the Greed Gang. As long as the possibility to miss out on the competition exists, these bastards won't be satisfied.

I said it elsewhere but I'd have supported the ECA - the whole ECA, mind you! - coming up with a plan for its own European competition, where the participating clubs get ALL the TV and sponsorship money, with complete transparency and without the middlemen that is UEFA. But obviously that's not acceptable to the Glazers, Perez, and the other leeches because the revenue streams still aren't guaranteed.
 

VP89

Pogba's biggest fan
Joined
Dec 6, 2015
Messages
31,645
What happened to all the talk of kicking us out? Why offer the clubs a way back? Could it be, that without Real, Barca, United, Liverpool and Juve, your product (let’s be real that’s what the CL and EL are to UEFA) is worthless to TV and sponsors?

This is the same gutless UEFA that’s allowed City and PSG to circumvent FFP with ease and showed the world that in court, they couldn’t even enforce their own rules.
Of course if a U turn was made then we can forget this all happened and move on. It would be daft if the clubs made a U turn and they were still banned from CL/UEFA, that doesn't help the fans or the revenues.
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,431
But you said the only problem is the lack of relegation for founder teams, I read that as you saying it's a minor issue. You also said you want to see more exciting matches in European competition, how do you propose that happens?
To start with it should be not a 36 team tournament. Present format is bloated already and the new format makes it even more boring. Maybe have more knockout matches before starting group matches to make the groups more competitive. ESL actually gets one thing correct that most want European football to be more competitive. If they didnt have founding member being permanent feature, this would be much more acceptable to all ( i mean more competitive games). After all, despite all the hue and cry, only Everton (in 2005) and Leicester ( after they won the league) made it to CL apart from the 6 who are part of ESL.

They need to find a balance and provide much shorter version of European cup competition. Also I want strict rule that no club is allowed infusion of capital from its owner if their turnover is beyond certain amount. For smaller clubs certain percentage of turnover can be allowed to be infused from owner but only for a certain period of time. This would have solved most of the problem clubs are facing already as the inflation due to super rich owners have made business unsustainable for clubs which rely only on their revenue.

Hopefully a system which rewards shrewd investment and academy of football club is proposed and accepted. This alongwith competitive European cup games would be my ideal choice.
 

Bob Rivers

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Feb 17, 2021
Messages
98
Supports
Chelsea
The not so king has spoken, although big respect to Milner for having the balls to come out and say it.
Milner's 35 and has one year left on his contract, so he literally has nothing to lose by speaking his mind.
 

LilyWhiteSpur

New Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
12,370
Location
Northern Ireland
Supports
Tottenham
Why? They're as big a driver of this as anyone. They're owned by Fenway Sports Group. This was their goal since buying them.
It may well have been, but I think with the way their fans are, the way their manager is and their players already saying "they don't like this" they have a lot to lose, they are seen as the model of club ownership. The Glaziers and Woody are already hated by the majority of United fans.
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,682
Location
Chesterfield
I think City and Chelsea will go, I think the backlash from clubs going will prevent others from putting their name to it.

I say think, I mean hope.
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,667
I voted "YES" for the ESL because:

1. I'm sick of VAR, the lack of consistency of English referees. I'm honestly tired of being frustrated with the lack of accountability with refereeing

2. I lost interest in watching Manutd games against the likes of Granada, Burnley, Cyrstal Palace, etc. I find myself always scrolling through Instagram during these small team games. During big games against the likes of City, Liverpool and Chelsea, however, I'm fully emotionally invested. And I like that feeling. So hopefully the ESL can bring back my passion for football

3. I'm sick of paying multiple telecommunications hundreds of dollars per month for sports coverage. The ESL can solve this issue by having its own network or partnering up with leading streaming companies such as Netflix, Hulu, or Disney. I do not mind for paying affordable streaming services. Currently, I'm subscribed to Netflix and Disney.

From a football fan perspective that does not reside in UK, I don't see any downside to the ESL. I notice that is a lot of talk of "English Pyramid", "Coaches jobs", "Stadium infrastructures investment", "UK tv rights", etc. Not to be insensitive, but none of those are a concern to global football fans that just want to watch the best players compete against each other in a convenient platform at bargain prices.

The stuff that excites me most about football:

1. Watching the best team which also means best players and managers competing against each other

2. Transfer market. Imagine trading Bruno Fernandes for Harry Kane. I know it sounds ridiculous, but I think that is what us younger fans want to see. Shocking and exciting transfers. Changing team dynamics, etc

I think the ESL can provide an outstanding product. I will probably receive backlash for this post. But this is my geniune opinion, and I cannot wait for football to be exciting again. I want to be emotionally invested week in and week out, and that can only happen if the best players in terms of skills and branding are pitted against each other.
So you wish to consume Entertainment or Reality TV, not a Sport. Gotcha.

The fact that a fan can opine that the game isn't exciting enough but wants to artificially make the game more exciting by having more transfers is the reason why I stand by my opinion that the worst part of football is the "fans".

This is a never-ending cycle that will end in mid-season transfers being voted for by twitch stream viewers and players moving between teams like a fecking X-Factor phone-in. Us old-fashioned (34) sods must be so out of touch that we find the game exciting enough without the need to turn. I don't think we need to pander to children who have the attention spans of goldfish due to their unrelenting diet of YT, IG, and Twitch where you need to consume more and more, quicker and quicker. It is all very dystopian.

My advice would be, just watch e-sports mate.
 

Siorac

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
23,816
The people leading this have gone into hiding, are saying nothing and are letting the players and managers face the media.
Yeah but the tweet says it's execs who feel like they've been hung out to dry.

And to be fair, Florentino Pérez, chairman of the whole shoddy business, did ramble on about saving football.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,838
The way this appears to be heading I don't think the 14 in the PL (or UEFA) can, no, it's the only leverage they have. The six English clubs involved in this super league probably owe the rest of football hundreds of millions in staged payments on transfer deals relating to appearances in these competitions. If they're kicked out for breaching the rules then suddenly all of the clubs owed money have serious recourse for litigation and claiming these transfer payments under breach of contract at a time when the 6's income will be badly impacted while the ESL is being set up. The UK broadcasters will want to sue somebody...whoever they initially go after, the lawsuits will ultimately end up at the feet of these six PL clubs. Likewise, if you ban players from tournaments that puts them at direct odds with their clubs. Are Nike going to pay Harry Kane all of his sponsorship deal if he's not at the Euros etc? In that scenario you then have Harry Kane and his agent at odds with Tottenham's board and pushing for compensation from them potentially. Suddenly the £300m gift payment isn't so attractive. If the 14 in the PL and UEFA ceed ground at this point and allow them to remain in the competitions then their leverage is severely diminished and the six will find a way to go at their convenience, we've already seen that they have no regard for the other clubs involved. I hope any Utd fan that's against this backs the PL14 in kicking them out and not take it personally.
As a United fan, I am fully on board with the other teams attempting to kick the top six out. The club as an institution should not suffer for the decisions of it’s owners in an ideal world, but if this is the only way for them and Woody to feel the consequences of their actions, then so be it. Let the club burn.
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Of course if a U turn was made then we can forget this all happened and move on. It would be daft if the clubs made a U turn and they were still banned from CL/UEFA, that doesn't help the fans or the revenues.
We can move on but I certainly hope we wouldn't forget what happened. I would want reforms to be put in place. And by "reforms" I don't mean the sort the big six were looking for, I mean the sort that would stop them from pulling a stunt like this again.

And if they wanted to level further punishment at the clubs who created this shit show then that'd be fine by me too.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,797
On what grounds will the 14 actually kick them out? They dont want to participate in CL and want to play in their own league. Other 14 are free to play in CL organised by UEFA. Nothing is changed in domestic league. If they try to kick out, courts will overrule them and most of the litigation will actually end up on these 14 clubs.
So there’d be six teams hanging around in the league stinking the place out with their extra money and star players, not even having to qualify for anything while the others all battle it out for CL places, relying on these selfish 6 pricks not to field weakened teams against their rivals etc. it will make a mockery of the league and totally against the fair sporting principles of finishing to qualify for international tournaments. I can’t see anyway they could stay in the PL
 

duffer

Sensible and not a complete jerk like most oppo's
Scout
Joined
Jun 24, 2004
Messages
50,410
Location
Chelsea (the saviours of football) fan.
I think City and Chelsea will go, I think the backlash from clubs going will prevent others from putting their name to it.

I say think, I mean hope.
You'd imagine they're the most likely, given the financial circumstances.

The deserve zero credit if they do however. All the teams that signed up for this should be equally ashamed.
 

Devil_forever

You're only young once, you can be immature f'ever
Joined
Apr 28, 2007
Messages
11,010
Location
Head of the naval division of lolibfascon
Of course if a U turn was made then we can forget this all happened and move on. It would be daft if the clubs made a U turn and they were still banned from CL/UEFA, that doesn't help the fans or the revenues.
Just yesterday he was saying there’s no way back and it’s war. Make UEFA follow through for once or have them admit that they’re absolutely powerless. I lost faith in UEFA completely after the City CAS case.

Same with the clubs in the Premier league threatening the likes of Liverpool and United, without these two teams in the league, the premier league loses TV money overnight.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,317
The people leading this have gone into hiding, are saying nothing and are letting the players and managers face the media.
Gone into hiding? Have they ever not been in hiding? They all sit silently in their massive mansions counting their billions and pulling the strings of the league. Abramovich is the only one who ever had a public facing persona, and that's only so Putin couldn't off him.
 

Zlatan 7

We've got bush!
Joined
May 26, 2016
Messages
11,797
What happened to all the talk of kicking us out? Why offer the clubs a way back? Could it be, that without Real, Barca, United, Liverpool and Juve, your product (let’s be real that’s what the CL and EL are to UEFA) is worthless to TV and sponsors?

This is the same gutless UEFA that’s allowed City and PSG to circumvent FFP with ease and showed the world that in court, they couldn’t even enforce their own rules.
Your point? To let them make their own league?
 

pratyush_utd

Can't tell DeGea and Onana apart.
Joined
Aug 30, 2017
Messages
8,431
So there’d be six teams hanging around in the league stinking the place out with their extra money and star players, not even having to qualify for anything while the others all battle it out for CL places, relying on these selfish 6 pricks not to field weakened teams against their rivals etc. it will make a mockery of the league and totally against the fair sporting principles of finishing to qualify for international tournaments. I can’t see anyway they could stay in the PL
Argument was whether it is legal to kick them out which despite my limited understanding, doesn't look likely. Morally and Ethically it is wrong and we can all agree on that but i am hopeful certain compromises which benefits the league as a whole can be reached.
 

spiriticon

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2013
Messages
7,446
I don't get why it is illegal for the FA and UEFA to ban clubs and players from their own competitions. It's their competition, they make the rules surely? They ban whoever they like.

It's like Perez making the rules of the Super League up as he goes along, starting Madrid on 13 titles and all that crap.
 

Cloud7

Full Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2016
Messages
12,838
So you wish to consume Entertainment or Reality TV, not a Sport. Gotcha.

The fact that a fan can opine that the game isn't exciting enough but wants to artificially make the game more exciting by having more transfers is the reason why I stand by my opinion that the worst part of football is the "fans".

This is a never-ending cycle that will end in mid-season transfers being voted for by twitch stream viewers and players moving between teams like a fecking X-Factor phone-in. Us old-fashioned (34) sods must be so out of touch that we find the game exciting enough without the need to turn. I don't think we need to pander to children who have the attention spans of goldfish due to their unrelenting diet of YT, IG, and Twitch where you need to consume more and more, quicker and quicker. It is all very dystopian.

My advice would be, just watch e-sports mate.
Man I’m 28 and I’m just like....am I really that old? Is this really what the generation below me wants?

It just sounds like these people don’t actually enjoy football, and are trying to turn the beautiful game into some more appealing to themselves. It’s disgusting.
 

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,527
So will there be CL and EL football next season? Does top 4 matter? Also, what will happen to the big 6, will they be punished by the PL/UEFA/FIFA? So many questions so little answers