It's got his pudgy finger prints all over it, hasn't it?A name immediately springs to mind.
With one defector, the "left behind" teams in the PL would count for 75% of the votes in Premier League. Which Im told is significant.Hopefully Spurs isnt the 1 defector, as the other 5 wont give a shite
Why is it so difficult for our players when others have?They are not freedom fighters. This notion that they should go against their employers publicly is just naive and stupid. No one here will do it. Not sure why it is expected of players and managers
They can choose not to. As I told they are not revolutionaries. This expectations is unrealistic and unfair.Why is it so difficult for our players when others have?
We're not selling or cancelling anyone's contract because they speak out. They might get a bollocking but so fecking what.
I read you need 14 member votes in the EPL to make a decision which they already haveWith one defector, the "left behind" teams in the PL would count for 75% of the votes in Premier League. Which Im told is significant.
I’m not saying all of them are lying. You saw last night when Neville and Carragher were talking about everyone coming together to fight it and unity. None of the media want it and they all want to stop it so I wouldn’t immediately rush to believe what they come out with.If you think so. However, I'm not going to disbelieve all of the journalists in the UK.
Not as drastic as this, mate. And it’s being wilfully ignorant to suggest this is even remotely similar to what’s happened in years past.That process starred decades ago mate. I still support my team but I’ll never think of it as the same.
From City’s perspective I can only imagine, as someone pointed out, it’s a FOMO thing. Possibly also to gain exposure, of course they are much bigger since the takeover but no doubt there are plenty of people in the world (my mum being one of them up until I had to educate her ) who still have only heard of one team from ManchesterThis is my entire problem with the whole situation.
Perez talks about this concept as if it's saving the game? From who? Himself? For being completely unable to manage a club within it's means? For removing equality in his own league?
Then there's our lot, are we saving the game from owners who pile mass amounts of debt onto a club? Or those who run clubs as a second rate organisation, and cry poverty when the performances on the pitch aren't on the same level as they achieved under the greatest manager in football history? A manager who achieved his success in spite of these parasites.
I could do this for practically every club in this "league". But we can all see through it, we all know his has been set up to create a bottomless well of guaranteed cash. Cash to help circumvente the billions these clubs have pissed up the wall through their own incompetence.
Which begs the question, why in the feck are City in here? They are the only Club that is "sustainable" from this who's who of organisational incompetence. They should be the ones who break off, they have absolutely nothing to gain and everything to lose.
I'd love it if Ole used the word feck in his presser.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Thus why I said started.Not as drastic as this, mate. And it’s being wilfully ignorant to suggest this is even remotely similar to what’s happened in years past.
Burnley 17/18 ChampionsThat's pretty embarrassing tbh.
Yep. Doubt Perez has the power to change the rules of world football to be honest. 12 are struggling to get the job done as we stand.He didn’t mean that, he was just chatting to a mate wasn’t he @cyberman ? Obviously nothing will change and football is going to be bigger and more exciting than ever!!
If we moved our stadium and no longer based ourself in Manchester, are we still going to call ourself Man Utd, or just something like Red Devil’s United?And now they're called Las Vegas Raiders. Keep this shameless Americanization and all their name/stadium shenanigans out of football.
The story had just broken but it was before the announcement wasnt it and certainly before all the furore. He was able to deflect it as nobody really had much info.Same with Solskjaer on sunday.
Fecking hellTweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Serie A Assembly: "With this much extra money we can't possibly compete with Inter, Milan and Juventus", to which Agnelli replied with: "I see no change, we've been winning for 80 years".
This has already been debunked by Stoney. He is far more reliable than Sky Sports
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
He doesn't have to change the rules of world football. That is the entire point of this.Yep. Doubt Perez has the power to change the rules of world football to be honest. 12 are struggling to get the job done as we stand.
Yip.The “who will risk €12bn in a multi year broadcast deal” question has Amazon written all over it.
Red Devil Raiders sponsored by Wallmart and brought to you by BudweiserIf we moved our stadium and no longer based ourself in Manchester, are we still going to call ourself Man Utd, or just something like Red Devil’s United?
It’s like playing PES without licensing patch.
It's different asking someone who works to put foodon the table to stand up and asking people with millions in the bank to do it.They are not freedom fighters. This notion that they should go against their employers publicly is just naive and stupid. No one here will do it. Not sure why it is expected of players and managers
He's right though. The Champions League has been a key driver of massive inequality in the European domestic leagues. The ESL is just following the path that UEFA laid out to its logical end.Takes some doing to come out of this as the biggest cnut but Agnelli is putting in great work on that front.
They are choosing to withdraw themselves from Europe. No way they will move from EPL. There is no compulsion to play CL if you play in EPL. So there are no grounds to remove them. Even UEFA can't do anything.the more you read and listen to all the views the more I come to this conclusion;
If the shithouse 6 do go ahead with their plans to form a superleague, they will not remain part of the EPL.
It says in this article Sky pay nearly £1.2b per season for PL rightsHard to say, it would obviously worth less, but never 10%. The rights are currently around £1.5bn per year... you'd probably be looking at half I think, as the EPL brand alone would still be a thing and a big deal.
Looking locally...
Sky pay £200m per year for Prem rights.
They pay roughly £120m per year for Championship rights.
So it certainly won't be 10% locally at least.
Agree we are the worst of the lot. Liverpool and Arsenal owners second and third .Its sad that if it crumbles, you know full well our owners will be clawing desperately to make it happen. We're the worst.
Sky also have a vested interest in it not happening hence why their entire media operation is currently screaming greed and taking the game from the working man without any self-awareness.This has already been debunked by Stoney. He is far more reliable than Sky Sports
So let’s just let it roll now then? It’s started. Someone didn’t speak up ten years ago? feck them it’s already started.Thus why I said started.
Sky will try anything to destabilise this, BBC have said otherwise and I know who I'm trusting. If the clubs existed they'd name them to sow discord. Sky are essentially trying to take down the Super League with wishful thinking.
It is arrogance, but it is also the truth. The only thing that changes is the illusion that these other teams can compete (long term).
The amount of arrogance is staggering