" "Cultural differences" can range from choice of primary carbohydrate to whether you believe people of a certain ethnic group have a right to exist. It's not grounds to accept anything on its own. "Another one to add to a long list of shit analogies in this thread. You just compared hard labour and genital mutilation to what is essentially a term of endearment in Cavani’s home country. Well fecking done pal This is as bad as the guy in page 10 calling Jews stingy.
Which is why he is likely to get at worst a one game ban.Anyway, to address your first point, I do not know why Uruguayans and South Americans in general compliment black friends with the word negrito. Naturally, I do not agree with it due to the history of the word. However, Cavani is one in 432 million people who use this word without repercussions. Most likely, considering he’s just come, he doesn’t even know the word is frowned upon in England. In fact, his perception of England could be that it is a racist country considering one of the few times he’s come over with PSG, a black man got pushed off the metro by Chelsea fans. Because he likely used it a few times in Italy and France without consequences, he could believe that England is a bloody free-for-all. Again, it’s wrong but it’s possible.
What I said was that the FA are more racist than Cavani should they ban him, not racist. Imo, if Uruguayans come here and use that word how they want to, as long as it has good intentions unlike Suarez, we shouldn’t embrace it, but we shouldn’t punish them either. When it comes to a topic as sensitive as racism, clearly we have to agree to disagree as we’re not changing each other’s minds, but for me, the English should stick to not being racist their way, and the Uruguayans should do likewise. It’s good for peace as well if we don’t impose each other’s beliefs on the right way to behave on the other party." "Cultural differences" can range from choice of primary carbohydrate to whether you believe people of a certain ethnic group have a right to exist. It's not grounds to accept anything on its own. "
Please read the full post before commenting next time. It's exceptionally dull that I have to point out that those were more egregious examples to highlight the underlying fault in your logic.
Let me spell this out as clearly as possible for you; if we decide that something is unacceptable, it's not inherently racist to prevent people from other cultures doing those things while here and holding them to the same standards as everyone else.
Which is why he is likely to get at worst a one game ban.
Do you know what the word racist means? You are using it as if you know.What I said was that the FA are more racist than Cavani should they ban him, not racist. Imo, if Uruguayans come here and use that word how they want to, as long as it has good intentions unlike Suarez, we shouldn’t embrace it, but we shouldn’t punish them either. When it comes to a topic as sensitive as racism, clearly we have to agree to disagree as we’re not changing each other’s minds, but for me, the English should stick to not being racist their way, and the Uruguayans should do likewise. It’s good for peace as well if we don’t impose each other’s beliefs on the right way to behave on the other party.
Yes I doDo you know what the word racist means? You are using it as if you know.
Suarez didn't get in trouble for saying that word. Suarez answered the question "why did you kick me" withNot sure why I triggered such a response but thanks for the education on things I didn't know. With that being said, I do find it hard to believe that he didn't know that the English come down hard on that word. Not one ounce of me thinks he was being racist. But I'm also pretty sure that he would have known about his country man who got in trouble for using that word before. Mind you, I'm pretty sure Suarez probably said "f*cking" before the N Bomb and that takes it into a whole different territory
And thenMr Suárez replied "Porque tu eres negro". Mr Evra said that at the time Mr Suárez made that comment, he (Mr Evra) understood it to mean "Because you are a nigger". He now says that he believes the words used by Mr Suárez mean "Because you are black"
At the time Suarez denies this (lied) and said that he used the word negrito and not negro which contextuallly doesn't make sense. Later he admitted that he said negro but "only once" but only in a friendly manner. Evra said he used it five times and considering his surprised reaction by the word usage, having been kicked by Suarez eralier and the proceeded to be pinched during the altercation, Suarez was not being friendly. United's statement after the match was consistent and corraborated by 5 different players. Suarez statement after that match was that nothing happened and the only thing he said to Evra was that he was sorry about kicking him.Mr Evra said that he followed up Mr Suárez's reply "Because you are black" by saying "Habla otra vez asi, te voy a dar una porrada", which means "Say it to me again, I'm going to punch you". Mr Suárez replied by saying "No hablo con los negros". Mr Evra said that, at the time, he understood this to mean "I don't speak to niggers", although he now says it means "I don't speak to blacks".
I'm honestly baffled by his last post, I was willing to write a reply initially but after reading it I have written off the exchange.Do you know what the word racist means? You are using it as if you know.
I don't think you do at all, as that is not the right word to be using. If you wanted to indicate your point more accurately, you could have said the FA are "culturally ignorant" or "lacking in knowledge of international differences"Yes I do
I've only got 4 posts in this forum left today and won't be wasting it on this topic, it can only go one way from here.I'm honestly baffled by his last post, I was willing to write a reply initially but after reading it I have written off the exchange.
Suarez kicked an opposing player because he is black/negro/dark skinned. Doing something to somebody because of the color of their skin.Suarez called Evra that because of Evra’s skin colour.
What about Pablofer2222 ? Did Cavani use it referring to the guy’s skin colour?
I'm afraid this would be beyond their level of reasoning. This is in no way, close to the Suarez situationSuarez kicked an opposing player because he is black/negro/dark skinned. Doing something to somebody because of the color of their skin.
Cavani called (apparently) his friend an endearing nickname.
And by the way, the word negro in Spanish means black, which is in no way racist because contextually it's fine and accepted.
FA should have a chat with the person Cavani called negrito and ask him/her if they found it insulting, racist, or derogatory. If the person didn't find it insulting, racist, or derogatory....then case closed. No harm done.
So if I work in German and My indonesian somehow had a racist equivalent in german I have to erase it?Basically yes, because once it's on Instagram he's not just saying it to his mates, he's shouting it out in front of his 7.8 million followers and it's not an English standard, it's an international standard.
To compare this to the Suarez/Evra incident, as some have is ridiculous, Suarez's comments were found to have been purposefully derogatory, Cavani's clearly are not. But Instagram is an international public platform and if people find it offensive, which I understand, then I'm afraid it needs to be called out and dealt with as publicly as it was posted. Cavani is not an idiot, if he had thought for just a moment about what he was writing he probably could and would have said something else.
This is probably taken the lead for the most pathetic post in this thread now.Geez, so many people are so butthurt and sensitive so much so "wanting" to making racism out of everything even the things that are not racist-now-turned-racist.
Won't surprise me people finding this post racist for "not" arguing against Cavani's post, because contexts is not important.
Also using black color fonts will be a racist thing to do in future, turning this two long sentences into white color is whitewashing
Of course. You would go to another country and use a word that is deemed offensive, and just continue to use it just because you're not from there?So if I work in German and My indonesian somehow had a racist equivalent in german I have to erase it?
If a british national working in Cambodia says something they deemed racist would you stop using that harmless word?
Benardo Silva got one match ban with his case to Mendy (his friend). Like I said before, I would like to know Cavani's friend skin colour, I think he can get away with nothing if that guy's skin colour is not black.Suarez kicked an opposing player because he is black/negro/dark skinned. Doing something to somebody because of the color of their skin.
Cavani called (apparently) his friend an endearing nickname.
And by the way, the word negro in Spanish means black, which is in no way racist because contextually it's fine and accepted.
FA should have a chat with the person Cavani called negrito and ask him/her if they found it insulting, racist, or derogatory. If the person didn't find it insulting, racist, or derogatory....then case closed. No harm done.
It's also a terrible suggestion as well, right? Because there are a whole host of reasons why someone might say they weren't offended by something even if they were, or they weren't offended by something because they've been exposed to a system that has desensitised them to it.I'm afraid this would be beyond their level of reasoning. This is in no way, close to the Suarez situation
He'll likely to be asked if he would like to provide a statement.Does this pablofer222 person get asked as part of the FA process?
Wait? What? So If I work in German I can't reply to my IG buddies in Indonesia? In a daily word everyone use?This is probably taken the lead for the most pathetic post in this thread now.
Congrats
Of course. You would go to another country and use a word that is deemed offensive, and just continue to use it just because you're not from there?
Is that your point?
Anyway, this thread is an indication that a lot of people need to read: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Longer-Talking-White-People-about/dp/1635572959
We can never have race discussions with people who just dismiss it as being "butt hurt" or similar terms. Feck it, thread is a dumpster fire...
You just said if there's a racist term used, "can I not use it"?Wait? What? So If I work in German I can't reply to my IG buddies in Indonesia? In a daily word everyone use?
It shows a complete disregard and intolerance on the part of the FA...which should be zero surprise to nobody with any knowledge of how the FA conduct their business.It's also a terrible suggestion as well, right? Because there are a whole host of reasons why someone might say they weren't offended by something even if they were, or they weren't offended by something because they've been exposed to a system that has desensitised them to it.
It's 2020, whether it was meant well or ill, received well or ill, there's no reason to be using terms of affection based on someone's skin colour. I'm sure if this is pointed out to Cavani he would likely agree with it because he seems like a decent guy and this could clearly be resolved with them just having a word with him but asking someone "are you offended by this?" is and always will be an absolute cop out and a terrible idea. Not only does it put unnecessary pressure back on the individual but "no harm done" to them doesn't mean "no harm done" to others because of this.
What happens then if he says that not only is he not offended, but that the whole being is blown out of proportion?He'll likely to be asked if he would like to provide a statement.
This is just dumb though. Something being culturally acceptable in one place doesn't even make it okay for you to do it there let alone anywhere else. Lots of unpleasant things that are culturally acceptable shouldn't be.Wait? What? So If I work in German I can't reply to my IG buddies in Indonesia? In a daily word everyone use?
I'm defending common sense from absurdityYou just said if there's a racist term used, "can I not use it"?
Is that not the question?! It's not exactly clear as your post has grammatical errors.
If so then yes, there is no common place for using a racist word. I really am worried if that's what you're trying to defend here.
Context, but not the context of racial divisions and language used to suppress black people?It shows a complete disregard and intolerance on the part of the FA...which should be zero surprise to nobody with any knowledge of how the FA conduct their business.
In 2020, we all still need context, an open mind, and above all, respect and education of other cultures and backgrounds. Just because men can traditionally marginalize women and their rights in the middle east because it's a cultural norm doesn't mean that can be done in a country such as the United States at the same level. Context is everything. Forcing someone like Cavani to "change" his ways is suppression at its finest. There's nothing malicious about his comment to his friend. Wasn't even being cheeky like Silva was towards Mandy. And Suarez lying to the FA and kicking out at Evra because he is black is an entirely different situation.
The problem is that's according to you, to the spanish it isn'tThis is just dumb though. Something being culturally acceptable in one place doesn't even make it okay for you to do it there let alone anywhere else. Lots of unpleasant things that are culturally acceptable shouldn't be.
The question is, is using racially derived terms of endearment something we should be okay with? The answer is obviously no, they're unnecessary, even when meant well.
The question is how to address it, likely pointing this out to Cavani would be sufficient, but the correct response to the inevitably heavy handed response by the FA isn't to pretend it isn't an issue.
I'm defending common sense from absurdity
So if I work in German and My indonesian somehow had a racist equivalent in german I have to erase it?
If a british national working in Cambodia says something they deemed racist would you stop using that harmless word?
In your example you just said so-and-so word is racist, so you yourself are even saying it's a derogatory word.
I'm not talking about Cavani here. I'm talking about what you just asked.
I think you should take that analogy and argument back to the drawing board as you're not making any sense here
Here's an example of recent similar event.Simply put, 네가 (ni-ga) can be directly translated as “you” and is used with a verb when “you” are either the subject or object of the action being taken. Some examples would be 네가 해 (You do it) or 네가 옳아 (You are right). It is important to understand that this word is differentiated from the “너” (nuh), also meaning “you” but this time as a nominative or objective pronoun. In multiples cases, the two are used interchangeably.
내가 (ne-ga) can be directly translated as “I” and is also used in constructing a basic sentence with verb, for example in phrases such as 내가 샀어 (I bought [it]) or 내가 만난 사람들 (the people I met). Here, the equivalent of “너” is “나” (na), also meaning “I” or “me”.
I hope that this answers your question, but encourage you to check out more professional explanation if you are interested in understanding the complex sentence structures of the Korean language.
You're absolutely right tbh. I meant it in a way that the F.A might not bother doing much investigation and just punish him without a little bit of common sense.It's also a terrible suggestion as well, right? Because there are a whole host of reasons why someone might say they weren't offended by something even if they were, or they weren't offended by something because they've been exposed to a system that has desensitised them to it.
It's 2020, whether it was meant well or ill, received well or ill, there's no reason to be using terms of affection based on someone's skin colour. I'm sure if this is pointed out to Cavani he would likely agree with it because he seems like a decent guy and this could clearly be resolved with them just having a word with him but asking someone "are you offended by this?" is and always will be an absolute cop out and a terrible idea. Not only does it put unnecessary pressure back on the individual but "no harm done" to them doesn't mean "no harm done" to others because of this.
You don't have to erase anything, you just don't, as a well followed celebrity, say it on platform that will reach millions of people around the world.So if I work in German and My indonesian somehow had a racist equivalent in german I have to erase it?
If a british national working in Cambodia says something they deemed racist would you stop using that harmless word?
Mate your argument is crap, you haven't explained it at all and if that was your point you should have said it from the start.Here's an example of recent similar event.
How do you expect a Korean not to use the word so common, just because it resembles the N word?
If it's a very peculiar word you could have a point, but an everyday word? Maybe you should ask the KPOP to stop using the words "you" in their song because that's racist.
The FA are not us. They are going to be the culture police and the bullshit righteous police and probably rule against Cavani. They have zero right to punish Cavani when context is examined. His isolated comment to a friend has zero connection to an us v them discussion of racial divisions.Context, but not the context of racial divisions and language used to suppress black people?
We force people to change their ways all the time. It's suppression of the use of terms which have invariably been drawn from a time when their purpose was to draw a line between "us" and "them".
Things don't have to be malicious to be harmful.
Millions of International people, not just English. It's a massive platform but it's not exclusive to English speaking nation, hence your insistence to erase it by applying "English" standard is insulting. You're insinuating Spanish people should stop using their words, their culture and their daily communication word because it sounds offensive in EnglishYou don't have to erase anything, you just don't, as a well followed celebrity, say it on platform that will reach millions of people around the world.
Personally, I am not offended by what Cavani has said and am sure he meant it harmlessly, but I am not black and another poster has written very well on here a bout why diminutive terms about colour are clearly offensive to many people. So if you use a massive platform to use that kind of language you have to expect repercussions.
No it didn't.The spanish language exist long before slavery
WordI am Uruguayan, same as Cavani, and probably the other person he is talking too...
Is England the law about how everyone in any country should communicate?
I mean, England will teach the world about not being racist? really?