Pacificgi
Full Member
- Joined
- Oct 22, 2017
- Messages
- 628
He was confident and read the game well, it was good to see. If he plays against arsenal, sanchez will be a proper test for him and where hes at at the moment
Can't spell victory without Victor
YeshLouis, is that you?
I strongly disagre with your take on aerial ability, but I doubt either of us will convince the other. It's somewhat similar to goalies. You can make up for a lot with a good leap and timing; however, there are cases where you simply will struggle if your reach is shorter than that of others. There's a reason why most great centre backs throughout history have been fairly big, except for the likes of Cannavaro. Look at how often Smalling wins the ball in front of the attacker when long balls are hit from deep within opposition half; our other defenders don't do that nearly as successfully.I don't know why you're listing heights, as great heading has more factors to it than that by a long shot. Remember Tim Cahill? One of the best at timing his movement, leap and head placement to generate some magnificent headers that either went clean through into the net, or left his marker looking like he had lead in his boots. Karl-Heinz Riedle, and many others the same thing. Richarlson is a proper threat in the air because he's sharp and reads the flight of the ball quickly and acts succinctly off the back of that.
You're talking about a specific type of header(er) who uses brute force up against the CB to win the header, whilst actually being a threat on goal - the league doesn't have many of those anymore, Benteke being the best at it and perhaps a game where you need a specialist in the air to deal with him.
Deeney is about brute force, not being particularly good in the air. You obviously put your strongest most physical defender on him as a general matter of common sense, not because he'll destroy you in the air, but because he's looking for any physical advantage he can get.
Morata is about movement and timing, not smashing into CB's. Linedlof has not shown himself to be good at judging the flight of balls yet, which is more the reason to not put him on Morata than anything to do with physical strengths, height or incompetence at actually heading the ball.
1-on-1, Smalling is very good, but he's also tremendously grabby, and he really does get away with a lot when it comes to fouling via shirt tugging or wrapping his hands around players in the box. I really wish he would cut that out because it's a 50/50 pen everytime and a matter of whether the ref feels like giving it rather than it not being one, which is tenuous to say the least.
Anyway, in short, aerial strength is not as important as it once was. I wouldn't forgo superiority on the deck for it in this day and age and I wouldn't worry about it until we were faced with a team who were notoriously strong in the air from both open play and set pieces, which, you're rarely going to find in the league these days.
Think he should to be honest, no need to knock his confidence by dropping him as soon as a big test comes along. Looked very solid against Watford and read the game as good as anyone yesterday.Real happy for him. I do wonder if Mourinho will reward his performances by starting him against Arsenal and/or City? Would be a huge test for him.
Don't think there's anything wrong with calling it how you see it and commenting on performances that have just happened.Or fans should cut knee jerk reactions and have some patience (myself included when it came to Lindelof).
Pretty sure he was meant to stick to Alexis and considering I seen a lot of Alexis he didn't do a great job.Bump.
If I'm honest, I didnt really notice him much v Arsenal. Rojo and possibly Smalling were worse.
Evidence enough that yes he is improving?
He could only do it in certain situations, usually when Sanchez was playing in around our right hand channel, he was able to push towards him and stay tight, and he did it well in those circumstances. Having a centre back man mark a playmaker who drops deep for a full 90 would be tactical suicide as it would pull us all over the place and leave huge gaps in the back line. It really is the job of a midfielder if it's going to be done. It wasn't anything like Herrera on Hazard, for example. Sanchez was everywhere and Lindelof wouldn't have been in a position to shadow him all over the pitch. If Mourinho wanted to do that, it definitely would have been Herrera.Pretty sure he was meant to stick to Alexis and considering I seen a lot of Alexis he didn't do a great job.
I think we may have bought him to play 3 at the back.He's fine in a back 3. I'll be more assured when he starts performing equally as well with just one other CB.
And you can’t spell Scunthorpe without C...
And you can't spell Arsenal without...
I don't know about you but it always leaps out whenever they come up on Soccer Saturday.And you can’t spell Scunthorpe without C...