Thiago is the first player, where I genuinely struggle to see that he does anything useful at all. I guess now I know how all the people felt, who consistently criticized Schweinsteiger and Kroos for "passing sideways".
For any ManUnited fan, who doesn’t frequently watch Bayern matches: Thiago is a bit like Pogba just without all the highlights. There is little left. Thiago usually does nothing despite having incredible freedom. He hardly ever scores/assists and he is also not a play-maker. He is not carrying the ball forward and he is not the central figure who distributes the ball. His defensive contribution is okay, but nothing special. He is just tagging along doing nothing most of the times. He looks tidy while doing so; I have to give him that. I’d also add, that he played quite a bit last year, but he was never a central/important player for us (despite Pep….).
He is now injury-free, he isn’t overstrained and he has all the freedom in the world on the pitch. We need him to step up, but sadly I don’t see it at all.
The Götze and Thiago transfers didn't work out.
As I said above, it's strange - my perception is just different than yours seems to be. I'm not saying Thiago doesn't need to improve or that he didn't have some terrible performances, but I don't see at all how these should overshadow what I perceive to be, quite regularly too, decent to excellent performances.
These good performances might happen more often with weak opposition, but isn't that true for many such technical midfielders? As if Kroos, for example, doesn't have his instances of being completely overrun and/or weak and invisible?
I realize that both perform different roles and with varying success so the comparison might be off, but if we're talking about influence or impact in tough games I find it harsh to single out Thiago as clearly.
Anyway, both of you seem to view Thiago's contributions fundamentally different than I do and that's not something I can brush aside. I can't be sure whether my view is accurate or right, especially since I'd usually subscribe to pretty much all posts of the two of you. I don't know. Maybe I rate highly him mainly because I want to. But I still do.
If we don't beat Leverkusen this weekend, the criticism will get really loud.
Should be a fun season.
IIRC you were somewhat speaking out against a Carlo appointment, because of his uninspired and boring football, right? Well the current picture seems to confirm your reservations.
With the way we play recently, I'm reminded an awful lot of the 2014/15 Real, for example in the semis against Juve - more possession, 'attacking' most of the game, but no meaningful connection between midfield and forwards, a lot of mindnumbingly futile crossing and no clear plan to create chances.
We were dominant away at BVB too, after all, which is not that easy to do, but it was a dull kind of dominance.
Strangely we did look far more sharp, creative and incisive in some moments the begining of the season, even in the first, say, 20 minutes of the Atletico away game we ended losing.
Bad individual form of players who were reliable for years plays a part of course (Boateng, Müller, Lahm, even Alaba), yet an accumulation of several individuals in simultaneous bad form may hint at something not working either in the coaching approach or somewhere in the team environment.
This may include, yes, some kind of hangover from Pep's intensity, with Carlo's supposedly relaxed, fatherly approach underwhelming the players (funny enough how journos and commentators, also the little bitch Ribéry himself, were saying how the squad was 'liberated' by Carlo, what a load of bollocks). It might include some sort of saturation or burn out after many successes, it might be temporary or more deep seated. I don't feel able to tell.
But I'm not going to worry too much either way. We've gotten used to winning everything domestically just like that, we'll have to get used again to the fact that this is not normal.
And personally I won't worry too much about Carlo being the right man either. I'll just be content that he is our coach and that's that.
I'm going to put it this way:
If it's inevitable that we are going to have a weak season or two after several years of consistency at the top (maybe not win the league after unprecedented 4 in a row etc) -and it seems to me it might be inevitable-, I'd still argue that Carlo might be the best manager to have during that 'crisis'.
Not because he averts it, but because the club doesn't turn nasty and hysterical as easily.
And I fail to see whom else we could have gotten to succeed Pep who wouldn't get into trouble much more easily. Again, it might have to with me simply liking Ancelotti as a person very much.
One more thing however: Ever since the treble, people in Germany (ironically not just Bayern fans but also those who are against Bayern domestically) kept obsessing about the CL and the need/expectation to win it. IMO there's some kind of nationalist yearning for appreciation weaved into this, which FC Bayern apparently has to fulfill even for anti-Bayern BuLi fans. Hence also some of the more irrational and over the top anti-Pep outbursts, blaming him for 'ruining' Jupp's team and 'failing to win' in Europe.
This obsession dragged many down to the point they couldn't realize or appreciate the exceptional period of success and great football we did have with Pep, especially in a league that was by no means easy or weak -not a perfect period, not without flaws and low points, maybe not topping the 12/13 perfect storm, but still exceptionally great.
Now, many seem to 'tolerate' the much lesser defined, and somewhat lesser consistently successful, playing style under Carlo since they still seem to firmly expect Carlo to deliver what Pep couldn't. 'CL specialist' and so on.
I want to say very clearly that this is foolish. We might very well have to tolerate not winning the league and crashing out of CL early.
Because one thing I know for sure: you can't plan or expect a CL win, least of all when your team has stagnated in individual quality compared to the competition. We won't win the CL this year, we're frankly not good enough.
I repeat once again how baffled I am at the fact that we can't sub on a decent backup striker when we need a goal.
People pointed out we might have been very well erring on the frugal side in recent windows. Suarez was deemed too expensive in 2013. De Bruyne was deemed too expensive in 2015, (btw curious and really problematic matter if we think KDB was turned down and went to Pep's already decided future destination while he was still our coach, similar with Gündogan).
This attitude is very tricky to maintain for a club that has the self-concept of being a European elite club.