fps
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 22, 2018
- Messages
- 5,514
Fair enough, plus I believe it says a lot of Jose's mindset to criticise the younger players, not the senior pros who didn't make the difference (Or in Azpilicueta's case, did....)
Fair enough, plus I believe it says a lot of Jose's mindset to criticise the younger players, not the senior pros who didn't make the difference (Or in Azpilicueta's case, did....)
New manager on a team that just came from a transfer ban and sold their best player.Feel free to delete if there is one, I searched but didn't find one.
With the fickleness of the owner as we know it too be...how long with he last?
Big gamble, but the bad start doesn't help at all.
He'll be a Champion of Europe by then.Be gone by next Saturday.
Bollox. True.He'll be a Champion of Europe by then.
No chance, the 15/16 squad was significantly worse.Thought they played pretty well overall. But that's a horrid Chelsea side, worst they've had since 2011. He'll be a victim of it.
Funny thing was that he didn't seem to even know who he was despite him being one of the best players in their academy when he was manager there. Kind of sums up Jose's approach to management, the opposite to Fergie who knew every single player in the academy and all their family.If MM was 29 year old, JM wouldnt say a thing.
Chased out of town? Is he even allowed in at the moment?New manager on a team that just came from a transfer ban and sold their best player.
He's not getting sacked. Not unless the Oligark wants to be chased out of town by a bunch of offended Londoners with pitchforks. Frank Lampard is God at Stambrigde.
After asking for help remembering his name he basically said him and Tammy had weak performances and that Willian should have played even if he wasn't properly fit.What did Jose say about Mason Mount? I missed that.
I mean, we lost 4-0 but I didn't think they were anywhere near our worst players.After asking for help remembering his name he basically said him and Tammy had weak performances and that Willian should have played even if he wasn't properly fit.
Disagree, with a bit better finishing they could have gone in 2-2 at half time. Martial missed a great chance for United too.Can't blame him much, with a bit of luck Chelsea could've put game to bed in first half.
If you are youngster you are basically invisible in his world, even in pre match, he went on something about good reasons and bad reasons of Lampard picking younger players, dont remember exactly, who cares anyway.Funny thing was that he didn't seem to even know who he was despite him being one of the best players in their academy when he was manager there. Kind of sums up Jose's approach to management, the opposite to Fergie who knew every single player in the academy and all their family.
I think he was going for something along the lines of 'you don't win anything with kids (you need 30 years old cloggers)'. Kind of justifying his own approach to football.I mean, we lost 4-0 but I didn't think they were anywhere near our worst players.
Excellent might be a stretch but Azpi, Zouma and Pulisic (to a lesser extent) cost them the gameMount was excellent for Chelsea.
Random fact, my sister used to have her hair done by one of Mason's family. Can't remember if it's his mum or sister though.
In the context of being a young lad playing a huge premier league game at old Trafford is what I mean. He faded in the second half but you can see he's got something.Excellent might be a stretch but Azpi, Zouma and Pulisic (to a lesser extent) cost them the game
He's a talent for sure, won the best player at the u19 Euro a couple of years back. I've followed him through youth football. Bit of an end product player though, his all round game isn't the best but he's a real goal threat either scoring or creating with crosses and set pieces.In the context of being a young lad playing a huge premier league game at old Trafford is what I mean. He faded in the second half but you can see he's got something.
I don’t. He had a far more experienced squad to choose from that could have seen the game out comfortably but it was naive to say the least.Felt bad for him but better him than Ole.
Can’t wait for City to regain that status;after all,they are the modern ChelseaHis tenure marks the Arsenalisation of Chelsea. Unlucky for him but also signalled by his appointment is their re-decline to a lesser position in the European and domestic game. It's a correction in status long overdue at Chelsea.
Unfortunately, City's ownership is structurally deeper. City are the knocked down and rebuilt plaything of a state regime that is likely to provide financial support until the regime itself either fails or passes onto a generation disinterested in football. Chelsea on the other hand are owned by an individual resource plunderer who kneels before his President in all respects other than the governance of his hobby sporting institution. The whore yacht follows the family yacht until he wants to invest his money in something else. That time is coming. Bye bye Chelsea.Can’t wait for City to regain that status;after all,they are the modern Chelsea
Unfortunately, City's ownership is structurally deeper. City are the knocked down and rebuilt plaything of a state regime that is likely to provide financial support until the regime itself either fails or passes onto a generation disinterested in football. Chelsea on the other hand are owned by an individual resource plunderer who kneels before his President in all respects other than the governance of his hobby sporting institution. The whore yacht follows the family yacht until he wants to invest his money in something else. That time is coming. Bye bye Chelsea.