This is a strange position to take. This is a forum to discuss such matters. Players, their values and how they would fit in. Why leave cost/value out? There are several examples of us overpaying on a player and others where we are robbing the selling club. Countless other overpayments by other clubs. Carroll? Do you think spending 35M on him was normal? I bet that stopped them buying a few others for a while. Take a look at the current title thread as another example!
If we spent crazy money on a player we'd have a United tax added to every player after that.
There seems to be some people on here who genuinely think that the club havent got the forsight to plan what they do going forward - as if its football manager and there'll be no budget left to bring in another player later on in the window. Its as if they think the highly paid executives are going to accidently blow the full budget on one player and have their trousers taken down.
The club will have every idea what players they want, what areas they need to address and what they will pay for each player. If they choose to go a bit over what they wanted to pay for a specific player then they must think he's worth it - and that's good enough for me.
Fans have no idea what's going on behind closed doors, but I'd rather have a player in the manager wants and who he thinks will improve the side for a bit more than the clueb expected than be like Arsenal - making bids that aren't going to be accepted and seemingly leaving it at that.
At the end of the day the blokes running the financial side of things at the cluub seem to know what they're doing, so as a fan I'd trust the club to spend sensible amounts on the players they want, hopefully giving the manager the players he feels he needs to kick on.