Jules_T
Full Member
Wind forward 5 years. Who will be the better player and why?
Why?No contest. Garnacho.
I see a potential superstar in Garnacho. I don't see that in Pellistri. I think Garnacho looks a lot more likely to become a very productive player. It might not seem a big deal due to both being very young, but Garnacho is two and a half years younger than Pellistri. You'd like to think by then, he will be much further along than the latter is now. I'd argue that he already is ahead of him as it is. The only issue Garnacho has is that he's competing for a spot in the side against a potential legend of the club, Rashford.Why?
Not really. In that case also include Antony. Garnacho is only 18, it is very unfair to try and include Sancho, a 22 year old.I think Sancho should be included here all in the same age bracket.
I see it like this.
1. Garnacho
2. Amad
3/4 Pellistri & Sancho
Well, Pellestri is 21 and Amad is 20. 22 year old Sancho doesn’t really stand out — except for the fact that he’s an experienced player with a few top seasons behind his belt.Not really. In that case also include Antony. Garnacho is only 18, it is very unfair to try and include Sancho, a 22 year old.
Mind-blowing. You've seen enough about him that suggests he has the intelligence, technicality and vision to be like Mata? Wow. Can barely recall a single clever pass through the lines or through ball from him. If anything he usually fluffs those under pressure.Facundo.
He's by far the most intelligent of the three and doesn't rely on speed and trickery.
Could be made a top Mata like player.
What makes you think this? To me Garnacho looks the more composed and quick thinking.Facundo.
He's by far the most intelligent of the three and doesn't rely on speed and trickery.
Could be made a top Mata like player.