That's again nonsense. Yes, you don't need to play for goals/xG when you're in the lead but Dortmund could or almost should already have been behind when they scored their first and it was a natrow one goal lead until the 55th, at which time they also had fewer chances/xG. Leverkusen actually didn't create that much xG after the second goal. So your argument of is pointless yet a bit funny considering that you've been guilty of the very same mistake you accuse me of quite often - but I guess these kind of detail isn't all that important when it comes to analyzing games of teams you dislike
IF you want to take xG so literally you should be aware that .55 xG at the time of Dortmund's goal doesn't really come close to "should have been behind" and that Leverkusen was at .82 xG at the time of Dortmund's second goal, so they actually created more than half their final value afterwards. And again: looking at xG that way is pretty questionable: this game even gave us a good example why, since Tapsoba scoring an own goal before Haller could score a tap-in registered at 0 xG. I'll also have you know that it's preposterous to suggest that I dislike Leverkusen. Infact just yesterday I considered signing up for membership, when I saw that there were still tickets to buy for the Dortmund game and it's really quite cheap. If I can find some Köln fans to pool with I may become a fellow Bayer next season.
p.s.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date