Some points:
How was Pedro in his prime with 23?
So you lot are saying that Spain had better players? Well, of course they have had them, but that hasn't changed, has it? It's one way of saying Lahm and Schweinsteiger are in their prime now, but in 2010 they were the same age as Iniesta was for example and older than the likes of Ramos/Pique and much older than Busquets, Fabregas. The other way could be that this is their (Lahm and Schweinsteiger's) last chance to win the WC with Germany. Spain having better players hasn't changed, so if you apply the logic to 2010, you could apply ot now as well. The quality is still not comparable. Are for example Özil/Götze so much better than Isco who hasn't even made their 30-men list? Are Schürrle/Draxler really much better than someone like Muniain who also hasn't made the 30-men squad? Anothe way of looking at it is that Bayern broke their transfer record for one of Spain's national team player who so far hasn't even managed to be a regular for them. Same with United/Mata.
So Spain having better players won't change, not in the WC 2014 and also not int he next few years. Will you guys have the same reasons then again if you fail to beat them?
And I am not putting down your performance against for example England, but that England team was a joke which barely managed to come 2nd in a piss poor group in 2010. Despite what the media says and despite me rating some of the English players, they are just not a team, are tactically extremeley behind the top 10-15 nations and the way they play they don't deserve anything. Whereas Germany I see as a more serious and competent team in tournaments so I have higher standards for them to judge. These Standards however haven'n been met in recent tournaments for various reasons. And one reason probably is that the players were not good enough (yet) in 2010, but then for me that gap still applies. They still are not good enough compared to Spain (and maybe on par with Brazil).
Sorry I meant to write Villa, not Pedro.
Schweinsteiger and Lahm both also were in their prime at that tournament but that's 2 world class players for Germany against like 6 world class players in their prime for Spain. Add to that the fact that Spain's additional players were mostly better as well.
It definitely has changed. Not in the sense that Spain's squad has gotten worse but in the sense that Germany's squad has heavily improved. I rate Germany's squad highly but I still agree that Spain's is by far the best in the tournament. But saying that Germany hasn't been anywhere close to being successful these last years and that they haven't improved at all is just wrong. Löw might still have his brainfecks at times, I'm sure that hasn't changed. But the player pool has gotten so much better.
I don't see your point in the whole discussion to be quite honest. You're agreeing that Spain had and still has the better players (despite Germany's squad probably being at #2 or 3 maybe), yet you say Germany's recent tournaments have all been failures. Wouldn't the fact Germany's squad isn't the very best mean that winning the tournament isn't a must? Getting 3rd in 3 of the last 4 tournaments and 2nd in the other surely isn't anywhere close to being a failure.
Also who gives a sh*t about the German sports media? I don't read it, most of my friends don't either, and the ones that do, don't base their opinions on what the media says. The media only says what they can sell, and ridiculous statements or stories are always gonna look better than downplaying the own abilities. What would you sell if you were working in the media? "Lets get to the Quarters and see from there on" or "5 Reasons Why Germany can win the World Cup"
The only reason why the pressure on the team is so high is that we've come so close everytime and people are thirsting for going the full way now. If you're being honest at least half the nation doesn't rate Löw, the people who know their football stuff anyway, and most will say that Germany isn't the out and out best team in the world. They will only say that we have to win it now because German teams in the past have done so and we've kept coming extremely close.
Also I think everyone agrees that England in 2010 wasn't at its best. Still it's an incredible feat to beat them 4:1 with a team of unknown youngstars with no experience and without their talisman player who's been the national team's star player for 8 years straight. Lets not forget Ballack, despite not having the greatest flair, always was the media's darling while playing for Germany and the hype around him being the man was so big, that nobody knew just how Germany would do in the World Cup. Now a German team with no experience beating an English team with lots and lots of experience that was called a golden generation as well isn't anything you can downplay is it? 4:1, England's biggest ever World Cup defeat! Afterall Germany vs England is always a historical duell and it doesn't even matter who the teams field, the pressure will always be on and the winner will be applauded, the loser will be laughed at.
I don't think it matters for your reasoning if you personally rate Argentina or not because almost everybody in the world would've agreed that Argentina's squad (which beat Germany just prior to the World Cup) is better than Germany's. Argentina, who had scored the most goals in the World Cup ahead of Germany prior to the game, had Messi, Agüero, Tevez, Higuain and Germany had Klose. Yes Maradonna was always suspect, everybody thought that, but the fact that Argentina playing with all their strikers and Di Maria and Maxi Rodriguez can't even get a single chance against Germany over 90 minutes (Germany was playing with Friedrich and Boateng in defence) is absolutely incredible. There's no denying that it was an incredible performance of the German team.
These Standards however haven'n been met in recent tournaments for various reasons.
So basically this quote isn't one I can't agree with at all. Yes the game against Italy in 2012 was ridiculous, but aside of that Germany has been punching well above its weight ever since 2006. This German generation has arguably played the best football Germany has ever played in its history (on technical footballing level) and has had great games in all of the last 4 tournaments:
2006: Ecuador, Sweden, Argentina, Portugal (arguably even Costa Rica)
2008: Portugal
2010: Australia, England, Argentina
2012: Netherlands
Basically Germany has had a tendency of performing better at the World Cup than at the Euros this century, but they've still had highlights in each of the tournaments since Löw has been around (as an assistant and as a head coach)
Germany has furthermore had the best young player and the top scorer in both of the last two World Cup. They have completely changed their style from a physical side that somehow wins their games to an attacking side with lots of intricate passing that has scored the most goals in qualification for this World Cup. The last qualification game they have lost, be it for World Cup or Euros, was in October of 2007. In 2010, despite you thinking they haven't performed that well, Germany has scored 16 goals. The next best team scored 11, Spain scored 8.
So you lot are saying that Spain had better players? Well, of course they have had them, but that hasn't changed, has it?
This quote is the other one that I find weird. Nobody here denies the fact that Spain still has the very best players in the game. But you're completely neglecting that Germany's players have gotten so much better. You keep making these head to head comparisons between Spain and Germany, when the last time the two met, as we've been discussing, Germany had by far inferior and less proven players.
Nowadays players like Friedrich, Tasci, Trochowski, Marin, Kiessling, Cacau and Jansen can't get anywhere near the top players in Germany.
So no, Spain hasn't degressed, people are just hoping they've lost their hunger, which nobody really knows.
But one thing that is certain is that Germany has improved tenfold, and there's no denying that.
peace