g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Wasn't the case with Caicedo though. We were there but just couldn't be fag to do the complex paperwork.https://www.redcafe.net/threads/brentfords-data-driven-moneyball-success.474808/
Both clubs are run very similarly. Essentially, data > opinion.
Also their whole model is based on finding these guys, so they'll aggressively go for them, while clubs like United need the best of the best and can't fill their squad with a bunch of wonderkids, but need a blend of the top players and then some of the wonderkids. And a lot of these won't develop into top players without the environment like Brightons.They’ve kinda got the Dortmund model. Young players are more inclined to join them over a bigger club with more pressure and less opportunity like us.
I think we do scout these players but are finding it harder to persuade them to join us because they know the route to first team football just isn’t there. So while it’s easy to moan that we scouted them when they went for £3m and now they’re worth £60m, the truth is that we can’t make the same promises to them as a club like Brighton can.
Yeah that’s kinda the point I was making but thanks for expanding on it if that wasn’t clearAlso their whole model is based on finding these guys, so they'll aggressively go for them, while clubs like United need the best of the best and can't fill their squad with a bunch of wonderkids, but need a blend of the top players and then some of the wonderkids. And a lot of these won't develop into top players without the environment like Brightons.
Genuine question, are most of their signings already highly rated within FM?SELECT *
FROM fmDatabase
WHERE pa > 180
Yeah, ive said before but im convinced if Caicedo had joined us, he wouldnt have been playing as much as he did for Brighton ,and its likely we would have loaned him a lot (and maybe even ended up selling him after stopping progression).They’ve kinda got the Dortmund model. Young players are more inclined to join them over a bigger club with more pressure and less opportunity like us.
I think we do scout these players but are finding it harder to persuade them to join us because they know the route to first team football just isn’t there. So while it’s easy to moan that we scouted them when they went for £3m and now they’re worth £60m, the truth is that we can’t make the same promises to them as a club like Brighton can.
And they have feeder clubs in other leagues that they loan them out too, and if they do well they come back to Brighton. E.g. Mitoma at Union SG and some other guy that returned this summer from there too.Look at the number of players they sign every summer.
They've signed 9 players this summer, 11 last summer and 14 the year before. They roll the dice on undervalued players and trust the data that's telling them, there's some star quality in at least a few of them.
In principle, we've got enough holes across the team, whether a multipurpose RB (I like AWB, don't get me wrong) to a 6 and an 8, to CF to a definitive RFW, that you'd think one or two would back themselves.They’ve kinda got the Dortmund model. Young players are more inclined to join them over a bigger club with more pressure and less opportunity like us.
I think we do scout these players but are finding it harder to persuade them to join us because they know the route to first team football just isn’t there. So while it’s easy to moan that we scouted them when they went for £3m and now they’re worth £60m, the truth is that we can’t make the same promises to them as a club like Brighton can.
Title was Click Bait but the Video did a good job in explaining Brighton's Model . It is mentioned that most of the Brighton's unknown gems weren't so unknown and how they take lot of low priced punts but they do better job of farming them , developing them and finally integrating them .How many wonderkids or wunderkinds did they find?
Caicedo wasn't a find that only Brighton knew about, United tried to sign him before them.
Who else is a wonderkid that they signed?
Simon Adingra - who posted much better numbers there last season than Mitoma did when he was there.And they have feeder clubs in other leagues that they loan them out too, and if they do well they come back to Brighton. E.g. Mitoma at Union SG and some other guy that returned this summer from there too.
Caicedo, Enciso, Adingra, Mitoma, Ferguson, Sanchez, Ben White.How many wonderkids or wunderkinds did they find?
Caicedo wasn't a find that only Brighton knew about, United tried to sign him before them.
Who else is a wonderkid that they signed?
You would have to assume that other clubs are aware, but either don't follow through or Brighton get in there first. Mitoma in fairness they seemingly pulled out of nowhere.How many wonderkids or wunderkinds did they find?
Caicedo wasn't a find that only Brighton knew about, United tried to sign him before them.
Who else is a wonderkid that they signed?
No. Brighton have a clever recruitment team that people want to downplay, but they have fully earned their success by doing things correctly. Nobody knew who Mitoma was before Brighton signed him. Caicedo was probably the highest rated young player they signed as he was known by a few other clubs including Utd. That Tifo video tries to oversimplify things acting like every team knew about these players in advance, but it's nonsense. Big teams like Utd have scouts all over the world who scout huge amounts of teams and players. They'll have seen loads of players but if they don't have any intention to sign them they don't deserve any credit. Brighton found these players, relying largely on data and correctly assessed which ones were likely to make it. Despite what that previous poster said, not one of Brighton's signings were even close to having 180+pa in FM when they were signed. Most were average potential players.Genuine question, are most of their signings already highly rated within FM?
Gotta think agents have a big say in that too. As an agent I'd imagine you'd be more incline to move your client to a bigger club with a bigger fee, rather than for peanuts. For example caicedo to Chelsea for 115 mil is obviously better than caicedo to Chelsea for 3mil. Should the client come good it be hard to move them on again in a big money move, so youve lost out in millions.They’ve kinda got the Dortmund model. Young players are more inclined to join them over a bigger club with more pressure and less opportunity like us.
I think we do scout these players but are finding it harder to persuade them to join us because they know the route to first team football just isn’t there. So while it’s easy to moan that we scouted them when they went for £3m and now they’re worth £60m, the truth is that we can’t make the same promises to them as a club like Brighton can.
I think if you constantly prioritize your profits over the interests of your clients, many will hesitate to join you. Raiola for instance always claimed that the wish of the player was priority #1. Of course that doesn't have to mean much and there will be many bad apples in the basket but in general, I guess the agent will act in the interest of the player. And most of the time this will lead to future revenues as well.Gotta think agents have a big say in that too. As an agent I'd imagine you'd be more incline to move your client to a bigger club with a bigger fee, rather than for peanuts. For example caicedo to Chelsea for 115 mil is obviously better than caicedo to Chelsea for 3mil. Should the client come good it be hard to move them on again in a big money move, so youve lost out in millions.
We have a chap called Facundo Pellistri who's been knocking the door for years and we hardly ever give a run out to.In principle, we've got enough holes across the team, whether a multipurpose RB (I like AWB, don't get me wrong) to a 6 and an 8, to CF to a definitive RFW, that you'd think one or two would back themselves.
A lot of it is recruitment just not being canny enough to identify and hone in and then deal with any agent fee issues (work out details on percentages-it would still save us so much money longer term, even if only one out of three deals works out) . There might also be a not-altogether inaccurate perception that the manager is too cautious to play them, particularly since he has certain favourites -all managers do, but as noted elsewhere, it's striking how much he veers towards people he's worked with before, like a sophisticate's Redknapp or something.
I think reorientating ourselves as a club that backs the 'best' potential, ala Dortmund but with more historical 'prestige', against City's doped monolith and our own difficulties around ownership is the best way to go, short-term, in terms of footballing and 'brand' strategy alike. A lot of us understand if it's going to be difficult to win the league in the next couple of seasons, but a challenge founded upon a young side with playing foundations along the lines of what Brighton are doing stylistically would be the next best thing.
SELECT *
FROM fmDatabase
WHERE pa > 180
I find Tifo not very good compared to some other channels tbh, they seem half arsed compared to some others. This guys voice though, is horrific.
This is a much better video looking at Brighton's recruitment. As per usual, Tifo oversimplify things, making it sound like all of Brighton's signings are already well-known and downplaying how good Brighton's recruitment actually is.
51% of the transfer profit shown on the table at the beginning of the video is from Cucurella and Caicedo, who were sold to Chelsea.
This is a bit like thinking one of your local drug dealers is really good at business when one of his clients is simply a bigger addict.
Well, hence, 'There might also be a not-altogether inaccurate perception that the manager is too cautious to play them, particularly since he has certain favourites'... It would take ETH 9or his replacement if needs be) adopting a slightly different strategy too. Though I'm not sure Pellistri is quite 1st choice level either (I like him as a squad option, tbf, and think ETH should be giving him more time against Antony etc).We have a chap called Facundo Pellistri who's been knocking the door for years and we hardly ever give a run out to.
You could make the argument neither Sancho nor Antony has shown something meaningful for 6+ months despite being signed for massive fees. If we signed young players for reasonable fees we have the option to loan them too if they aren't good enough for the 1st team. So far, we've really not given any of the young players we've signed cheap a chance. Pellistri's done well anytime he's come on yet never gets any chance to show what he can do as a starter. Same with Diallo (obviously injured right now but all signs point to us wanting to send him out on loan before that injury anyway, even after he proved himself last season).Several posters said it but this kind of model can hardly be replicated for bigger clubs, who need instant improvement and quality.
They can nurture a few talents, but there’s no room for young but raw talents in every position.
Even Caicedo had a hard time when he arrives at Brighton. He had 6-months in Brighton, didn’t play that much, had to be loaned in Belgium, and was recalled in January due to injuries in Brightons midfield, even then he only played after a couple months. It was only last season that he found a good level that made him a 100m prospect.
And that was in an environment where he had close to no pressure, and luck played its part in getting him his first starting games.
Now let’s imagine if we had played someone like Amad or Mainoo and they failed to show something meaningful for 3 months, let alone 6-months…
Exactly. The pressure to perform is massive at United compared to Brighton. It is very important to play first team football at the age of 19-22.Also their whole model is based on finding these guys, so they'll aggressively go for them, while clubs like United need the best of the best and can't fill their squad with a bunch of wonderkids, but need a blend of the top players and then some of the wonderkids. And a lot of these won't develop into top players without the environment like Brightons.