pauldyson1uk
Full Member
Now that I will agree with.I think that Nev was a better leader, he could drift in CB if needed and he was better defensively.
However I do agree with the Irwin > Gaz idea
Now that I will agree with.I think that Nev was a better leader, he could drift in CB if needed and he was better defensively.
However I do agree with the Irwin > Gaz idea
I sayHad a debate at work with someone who said that Ashley Cole was way better than Irwin.
What's the Caf's (unbiased of course) view on this?
In a thread that defines Irwin as better than Neville - and where 99% of the posters confidently state that Irwin was better - this post is a bit funny.I dare to say he was even better then Gaz.
stats are a wonderful thing do look them upCole is better attacking than Irwin was
I thought it was pretty common knowledge that Cole is the greatest left back in Premier League history.Had a debate at work with someone who said that Ashley Cole was way better than Irwin.
What's the Caf's (unbiased of course) view on this?
It's a decent comparison.I thought it was pretty common knowledge that Cole is the greatest left back in Premier League history.
He'd probably cost 15m and 90k per week in wages in today's market. Assuming City didn't hijack the bid.Neville picked Irwin as the best in his autobiography.
Damn shame Irwin didn't marry a (wannabe) pop-star and constantly complain about his contracts to court publicity or perhaps he'd have been more widely known in the 24 hour media/internet era.I thought it was pretty common knowledge that Cole is the greatest left back in Premier League history.
Yes I grew up watching Irwin, but don't really judge a defender on set pieces although it is obviously a plus point for Irwin, Already said I think Irwin was a fantastic full back one of the best left backs in the PL era, and Neville was without question the best RB of the PL era so not thinking one is miles better than the other or even preferring Neville is not really that weird mate.Did you even watch Irwin play? Do you realise how many free kicks and penalties he scored, not to mention the odd cracker from open play. Irwin was a better overall player than Neville.
Irwin 529 appearances 33 goals
Neville 602 appearences 7 goals
People seem to focus more on those things rather than his footballing ability. You could say he's actually more underrated than Irwin.Damn shame Irwin didn't marry a (wannabe) pop-star and constantly complain about his contracts to court publicity or perhaps he'd have been more widely know in the 24 hour media/internet era.
Cole is a damn good left back but his media personality has gained him a huge publicity that has allowed him to be seen. Irwin never had that platform, nor did he crave it, or he would have been rated far much higher around the world. Look at how overrated Carlos was - simply because he was Brazilian, scored that riduculous goal, and had a huge public profile.People seem to focus more on those things rather than his footballing ability. You could say he's actually more underrated than Irwin.
Who said it was weird? Irwin was just as competent at defending as Neville was with probably a lot less high profile errors in his career. Not to mention the fact he could play both RB and LB and on top of that the set pieces and penalties he scored from and assists he created, all a lot more than Neville.Yes I grew up watching Irwin, but don't really judge a defender on set pieces although it is obviously a plus point for Irwin, Already said I think Irwin was a fantastic full back one of the best left backs in the PL era, and Neville was without question the best RB of the PL era so not thinking one is miles better than the other or even preferring Neville is not really that weird mate.
A poor man's Patrice Evra.
Cole is an excellent LB, but he cannot even kick a ball with his right foot. It is arguable whether he was better than Irwin at LB, but freekicks, penalties, corners an ability to play RB as well as he could play LB, imo puts him well ahead of Cole in so many aspects.Had a debate at work with someone who said that Ashley Cole was way better than Irwin.
What's the Caf's (unbiased of course) view on this?
Sorry, I disagree. On his day Cole is an exceptional full back.cole is overrated
Now this, I like.Cole is a damn good left back but his media personality has gained him a huge publicity that has allowed him to be seen. Irwin never had that platform, nor did he crave it, or he would have been rated far much higher around the world. Look at how overrated Carlos was - simply because he was Brazilian, scored that riduculous goal, and had a huge public profile.
And to think SAF only paid about 600k for him. What a bargainI was just browsing devilish's either/or thread and it seems that Irwin gets the nod over Gary Neville by most of the posters. Although Gaz was a fantastic player, the result wouldn't be surprising for anyone who remembers Irwin's performances for us.
In my view he was a world-class player. He had everything a full-back should have: solid in the tackle, read the game well, positional sense was spot on, he was quick and a good crosser. He also took a mean peno & was handy at free kicks.
If he had been Italian people would have creamed themselves over him.
What he said.To me it doesn't matter, this G Nev v Irwin talk.
G Nev played right, Irwin left so why the debate?
At least one of us gets their hands on the league ha....Should try! Denis is very approachable! Lovely guy! Always stops for a chat!He is Goa, India right now along with the premiership trophy at a Youth festival. Too bad I cant get in because you need to be in college to get an entry to the event.
This just isn't true.Bloody Revisionism, we all wanted him sold every season he was here.
SecondedBest left back and right back that every played for Sir Alex.
Quite simply the most consistent and selfless player I've ever seen. Looked like an accountant and played the game so effortlessly that most people failed to notice how bloody good he was.Best left back and right back that every playedfor Sir Alex.