Only a club that's not winning much in the present talks about their history.
I'm not saying football isn't about the past, cos it is, it's great to look back at goals, games, players, teams, managers and trophies won from the past, but, ultimately, the truly successful team is the one that is focused on the team here and now and what we're winning at the moment.
I'd much rather be living through history, and creating it, than wallowing in past glories to try and claim our superiority. United were a much better team than Liverpool in 1994, and still are now, and the fact the Scousers had to bring up their history to try and get at us shows they knew this.
Well, now we're close to equalling these coveted '18 titles' that they've been going on and on about, does it mean we're finally going to knock them off their perch? I'd argue it doesn't because we knocked them off their perch a long time ago when we got so much better than them and confined them to the title wilderness (they've got better in recent years, but still not good enough).
I've been lucky enough to have only lived through United's dominance, and never through Liverpool's, and I bet a lot of the younger Liverpool fans have either never seen them win the league or don't remember it. If I was a Liverpool fan, that'd make that history seem pretty hollow for me. And if I was an older fan, that history would only make me feel a bit depressed seeing how far short we fall of it now.
Maybe when we reach 18 titles, or even 19, Liverpool fans will finally stop living in the past. We'll have done them a favour if that's the case.