- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 36,967
Without sounding harsh, when you act like a cnut for so long, players and manager won't tolerate it forever.
With Real, definitely but again no one can compete with that Real side when it comes to personnel. With Chelsea, the difference is the competition. His Chelsea competed in a league that Leicester could win and managers like Rogers and Pellegrini. That makes a huge difference to a league campaign.Im not going into a great level of detail. We can spend hours and hours talking about what he did wrong. One thing I will say though is if you compare our Utd side to his Chelsea and Real sides, we are seriously lacking in quality despite spending a ton of money
Noticed that nobody addressed this postThe last five PL winning managers list is interesting.
Pep
Conte
Ranieri
Jose
Pelligrini
So yeah, I guess high intensity pressing attacking football is what wins the EPL
This was his third season, they extended his contract earlier this year. They clearly didn't want to sack him. Would you have given him more time? Or am I reading this wrong.United havent ‘stood’ by ONE manager in three since Fergie uttered those words. Why? Two reasons:
1. The club had no real succession plan
2. The club is not prepared to stick with long term decisions
I have NO respect for these owners or this board. They have NO respect for this club or it’s fans.
He did the exact same thing in second Chelsea stint. He’s notorious for creating an unworkable environment, throwing everyone under the bus if he runs out of ideas and wants his severance money.This is absolute bollocks, do you also think he went to his squad of professional footballers and said “Listen, guys, I fancy a pay off here, so please play shite for a few months”?
And why does everyone point to him living in a hotel as if it’s a bad thing? If I had a highly stressful job I can’t think of anything better than living in a luxurious hotel suite, with all cleaning and meals taken care of. That’s much better than rattling around in a massive house on my own.
Pretty much, he had no ability to bend or accept compromise and work with a situation he might not be completely happy with. It ultimately end up in him self destructing. For what it is worth I think tactically he's one of the best. A team in his image going up against a top team I'd always expect a chance of a result.I'm going to give my opinion first:
He refused to change his ways. The guy is proper middle aged man now and was still behaving like a 28 year old prima dona in press conferences. He still was trying to go for quick success without any focus on truly building a team. As for quick success? He got it totally wrong with almost all his transfers.
His arrogance was just too much for him to accept in changing his ways. I believe the fact that he picked players like Matic and Lukaku till the very end was him being stubborn just waiting for them to come good so we could all shut up about it.
To summarize, he refused to adapt and build Man United in a different way than what he knew. I still maintain he is a great manager but a very limited one. A manager that is great under certain circumstances and conditions.
Fair comment. I just dont think we should all pin 100% of the blame at Jose's door. Many players in that squad are not good enough, and it will take a long time to rebuild (again), but even more worrying how much time will it take to recoach these guys. People expecting that we will just flick a switch and start playing attacking footballWith Real, definitely but again no one can compete with that Real side when it comes to personnel. With Chelsea, the difference is the competition. His Chelsea competed in a league that Leicester could win and managers like Rogers and Pellegrini. That makes a huge difference to a league campaign.
And fans, press etc. The guy just looks miserable as sin 90% of the time and created a horrible atmosphere around the club.Without sounding harsh, when you act like a cnut for so long, players and manager won't tolerate it forever.
Yeah forgot club too. He should have been sacked after Sevilla game press conference.And fans, press etc. The guy just looks miserable as sin 90% of the time and created a horrible atmosphere around the club.
Would also say, it appears he just wants ready made players and doesn't coach players to any kind of decent level.
That's when my opinion changed. Still wanted him to succeed but wasn't arsed if he went.Yeah forgot club too. He should have been sacked after Sevilla game press conference.
Pretty much.He spat his dummy out at the beginning of this season because he wanted certain players and went the extra mile to try and prove he was right even sabotaging our team constantly shuffling the defence and playing midfielders there to say "I told ya so".
Then obviously wanted out and was kicking up a fuss left-right-centre.
That's what I thought in february 2016, I was still willing to welcome him and as hopeful as anyone else but to me there were question marks over his head. He has the wrong mentality for clubs that are expected to be at the top, basically Juventus, Real, Bayern, Barcelona, United and now City and PSG. He is probably perfect for perennial outsiders, he creates a mental siege for a couple of seasons achieve something deemed special for this club and then leaves because everyone is tired to be treated like minnows, he has continuously failed to go from outsiders to assumed favorites and it's demonstrated by his tactical approach during big games and when his team is on top, he will retreat in the fetal position.Personally I disagree with pretty much everything he said. I'm not favorable to Mourinho, because I think that he acts like a coward against big teams, I also think that the siege mentality isn't suited to mid to long term plans, that mentality puts too much pressure on the players psyche and finally I think that his relationship with Mendes can be toxic if we don't have a DOF to temper it.