I don't remember him getting a touch so there can't have been a significant one. All I remember is wondering whether Sancho actually came on.
I understand why Southgate benched him. With perhaps one exception against farmers, he's been turning in solid 5/10 performances for us since he first got called up. Whether the system is having an impact on him is hard to say, but it's equally clear that he's either not willing or not able to apply himself to it.
Any semblance of a system had gone out the window by the time Sancho came on last night anyway. All he had to do was use his copious pace and stamina to press like a bulldog for the final 20 minutes of a match. I was disappointed by his apparent lack of ability and inclination to do so in an important match (a second consecutive NL finals is not major, but also far from nothing).
Kane, a player renowned for not being particularly agile and who had already played the full match with muscular fatigue and the fear of more to come, was running around like a madman for those last 10-20 minutes. Kane may not have had anything like his best match but good god, you could tell he cared about its outcome. I suppose that's why he's the captain and Sancho is on the bench.
It's early days still for the dream of a rotating Kane/Sterling/Sancho(/Rashford/Greenwood) front 3 but the auguries haven't been promising. Sancho hasn't even looked like supplanting Rashford, who tries hard but is clearly still the "weak" link in our very strong starting trio.
Last edited:
