Is Fred the worst regular starter for United in living memory?

Amadaeus

Pochémon Fan Club Chairman
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
9,234
Location
Amongst footballing managerial 'Gods'
Thos stats reflect exactly what we saw (what I saw anyway). Started extremely badly - with some awful early brain farts - then went on to have a solid performance. As I said in another thread, people just see what they want to see with Fred.
Exactly.

Scapegoat. Not sure why Mods haven't closed this embarrassing thread yet.

Sure Alex Ferguson had midfield 100x worse than fred and what we have now, yet he still managed to win title.

I have to nominate this as one of the worse thread this year.
 

Varane around town

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2021
Messages
345
One thing I noticed about Fred for the first time- despite it being obvious to anyone who can see- is that Fred is really short and doesn't win any headers. So teams who don't fancy their chances vs Varane and Maguire can try and stick it on Fred.

Personally, I'm a big McTominay fan and I hope when he comes back into the pivot we'll look much more solid.
 

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,103
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
So Fernandes up front?

Where do Ronaldo and Cavani play then?



I'm sceptical about it myself to be honest.
Bruno, Ronaldo/Cavani +1 up front? I don't know. We've been doing transfers without much planning so we have to find some solution.
The only thing I do know is even Ronaldo up front isn't going to help if we can get xG=0,6 (like against Wolves).
 

scottw

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 1, 2018
Messages
116
Supports
ManUtd and AtlantaUtd
Donny watching him from the bench must be close to a mental breakdown. I’d be straight into the office with a transfer request.
I agree 100%, he is an idiot for staying and losing his spot to mcfred, never even given a real chance. Donny should be in there NOW and Fred on the bench... If you look at stats, Fred on paper isn't bad at all, but you watch him on the field and you want to turn the channel from his stupid passes it drives you insane. Ole, PLEASE give Donny a fecking chance or let him go b/c you are killing this kid..
 

noodlehair

"It's like..."
Joined
Apr 1, 2004
Messages
16,376
Location
Flagg
Matic is pretty terrible aswell
This. He's not even the worst midfielder who regularly starts, in our current squad. He's also trying to do the entire midfields job on its own when mctominay isn't there. The only player on earth who can do that even half competently is Kante.

Although in fairness I was half expecting an announcement that there was a lost child on the pitch yesterday.
 

swissgenius

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
552
The worst starter in living memory? holy overreaction...

Fred had an awful game and we don't need to discuss that. He had a lot of those when he had to deal with the midfield all by himself (paired with Pogba) but he also had some MOTM performaces when paired with McTominay in the big games and no one claimed he was the best footballer in living memory.

He should not be a starter in this team, that's right. In an ideal world, he'd be an MF backup who offers good and high energetic service when needed, especially against the ball.

Some of you must be pretty new to football if you've never witnessed a worse ManUtd regular...
 

BrilliantOrange

Full Member
Joined
Sep 13, 2018
Messages
1,341
Supports
Ajax Amsterdam
Fellaini
Phil Jones

Come to mind...

In terms or 'how they performed for United' (so not how good they were in general) Lukaku should also be in there..
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,485
Bruno, Ronaldo/Cavani +1 up front? I don't know. We've been doing transfers without much planning so we have to find some solution.
The only thing I do know is even Ronaldo up front isn't going to help if we can get xG=0,6 (like against Wolves).
I don't know the answer but I don't see how Bruno, Ronaldo, Cavani, Rashford, Sancho, Greenwood and Martial fit into 3 spots.

If we can't come up with a way for Bruno to play in a midfield 3 then I think we just need to get midfielders capable of playing in a 2 at a high level and allow Bruno to play where he has been operating.
 

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,103
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
I don't know the answer but I don't see how Bruno, Ronaldo, Cavani, Rashford, Sancho, Greenwood and Martial fit into 3 spots.

If we can't come up with a way for Bruno to play in a midfield 3 then I think we just need to get midfielders capable of playing in a 2 at a high level and allow Bruno to play where he has been operating.
Once we have fully fit McFred I think we will be fine. But until then I think we need to find compromise. Rashford is out, Martial and Cavani are barely match fit, and Sancho looks a bit overwhelmed so I think it won't be that difficult to pick a front 3.
 

passing-wind

Full Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2013
Messages
3,041
Fred is not good enough for where this club supposedly intends to be. If the team wants to hobble around 4th he's the ideal candidate. It seems even pundits have spoken vehemently about the quality of the midfield. If Fred was half as good as many make out, the central areas would not be identified as a weakness / priority.

As soon as a defensive midfielder is signed Fred will no longer have any use in the team. He only offers balance in a double pivot, brings little qualities outside of this description. I also think there's shortfalls in the management which causes him to be less versatile tactically. If the team maintained possession more effectively from the coaching side of things, Fred would likely be more useful but this is hypothesis not reality.
 

choccy77

New Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2008
Messages
6,059
Fred is not good enough for where this club supposedly intends to be. If the team wants to hobble around 4th he's the ideal candidate. It seems even pundits have spoken vehemently about the quality of the midfield. If Fred was half as good as many make out, the central areas would not be identified as a weakness / priority.

As soon as a defensive midfielder is signed Fred will no longer have any use in the team. He only offers balance in a double pivot, brings little qualities outside of this description. I also think there's shortfalls in the management which causes him to be less versatile tactically. If the team maintained possession more effectively from the coaching side of things, Fred would likely be more useful but this is hypothesis not reality.
Look at the players Man City did not buy

Fred, Sanchez

Enough said.
 

Mr.Plow

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 10, 2012
Messages
596
Lingard and Welbeck for me.

Gibson too but I guess he was a semi-regular at best.
 

AFC NimbleThumb

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,363
Lingard and Welbeck for me.

Gibson too but I guess he was a semi-regular at best.
The mans played significant roles in cup wins ffs! give your head a wobble.

By the fact you named Gibson there are vastly inferior players in your time watching United.

Lingard :lol:
 

WR10

Correctly predicted France to win World Cup 2018
Joined
Jul 19, 2009
Messages
5,644
Location
Dream
He was monumental last season whether you like him or not. This season he’s clearly exhausted from his Brazil commitments. He needs a few weeks off.

Time for Van de Beek to grow into his role
 
Joined
Jan 15, 2016
Messages
3,094
Location
Salford
It depends upon who qualifies as a regualr starter. In fairly recent memory, Schneiderlin and Djemba-Djemba were horrific. However, those of us who grew up with 1980s United saw far worse: Peter Davenport, Peter Barnes, Russell Beardsmore, Billy Garton, Graeme Hogg (og), to name just a few, as regulars. Yes, it really did happen. Players like those were in the team most weeks when my dad first started taking me to matches. Bad times.
 

KennyBurner

New Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2018
Messages
4,673
Location
ATL
Fred has been terrible recently but it’s quite ridiculous that he is getting so much stick when the problem is due to the managers team selection. It’s been clear for some time that pogba isn’t good enough for us in a pivot. There is also the issue of the Ole being content with both our midfielders getting overrun.
Fred is our best progressive passer. Both him and matic are the only midfielders willing to pass through the middle. He is pivotal to us getting the ball forward very quick. Let’s lay off these silly threads.
 

LDUred

Full Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2019
Messages
1,874
He's been good at times but you wouldn't want him as the mainstay of your midfield and more as a squad player or utility player.

I think the issue is also that other options in that position like McTom aren't exactly brilliant either. We're actually quite reliant on Fred at the moment, and yet he's probably a weak link in the team.
 

cyril C

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2017
Messages
2,658
Maybe. Like said already, some players just become the focus and people convince themselves that replacing them fixes issues that are far more entrenched. What I genuinely don't understand is if it is so obvious, why does Ole play him. If losing costs you your dream job, why would anyone pick a player that's gonna cost you it? What we do on forums is an opinion, what Ole does is factual.
According to some stats, Fred is as good as Jorginho. I am not a fan of Jorginho, but some press claim he is 1 of the best in EPL. By mathematical equation, Fred is 1 of the best.

Honestly speaking, don't think Ole has any choice. He needs someone very mobile to cover for Pogba (mistake), someone who can pass, and someone who can intercept and block. His only options are Matic and Fred, hence Fred.

The original question should be asked, why did we buy Fred, instead of ..... Whether foreign or domestic.

IMO, Fred is short. Not just physically, but short in passing, short in shooting, short in header of course, short in physical challenge / tackle.
 

UpWithRivers

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2013
Messages
3,662
Fred is another victim of the united curse. And that is not setting up players to succeed. Mata best number 10 when we bought him then played him RW. Rashford and Martial playing number 9 but better on the wing. Pogba all over the place, last seen as a holding midfielder. Lingard is a number 10 mainly played RW, last seen LW. McTominay and Fred as holding midfielders which neither of them are. Look at the Wolves game. Sancho starts on the LW and James on the RW. Yes they can both play there but surely Sancho was bought for RW and James is better as a LW. Could be that James was in to try stopping Adama but I didnt see him do that at all. Point being that yes we can rotate but in general players need to be not only in their right position but also tactically set up to succeed. Its no coincidence our payers play better away from United - Lingard at West Ham, Pogba for France, Fred for Brazil etc. James will be better for Leeds than he ever was at United. Not that we should have kept him.

We can go on and on. Fred is not good enough but he's a good player when he is used correctly. Hence he gets MOTM performances fairly regularly. Dont forget Pogba was trash at West Ham so was Bruno etc
 

ivaldo

Mediocre Horse Whisperer, s'up wid chew?
Joined
Nov 15, 2012
Messages
28,699
How has this reached 9 pages? Horrendous thread.
 

NinjaZombie

Punched the air when Liverpool beat City
Joined
Dec 7, 2011
Messages
10,168
I watched the game. Fred played in central midfield. A position where nobody, at any level, can a receive a ball and ask another player where to pass it before releasing the ball. Never mind in a PL match where the opposition has had one of the most intense high presses of any team in the league so far this season.

91% of Fred’s passes found their target. This has nothing to do with any other player. If you think Pogba was somehow operating Fred like a ventriloquist dummy you’re out of your fecking mind.
Passing accuracy stats cam be misleading. A player could complete their pass, but if that pass was to a team mate who was being marked and lost the ball immediately after receiving it, it would still be a completed pass.

All these passing completed percentages shouldn't distract you from the fact that he made two mistakes that led to goal scoring chances in the first 4 minutes alone.
 

Deery

Dreary
Joined
May 21, 2019
Messages
18,590
Passing accuracy stats cam be misleading. A player could complete their pass, but if that pass was to a team mate who was being marked and lost the ball immediately after receiving it, it would still be a completed pass.

All these passing completed percentages shouldn't distract you from the fact that he made two mistakes that led to goal scoring chances in the first 4 minutes alone.
He has a habit of zipping balls into forwards at much to strong a rate and the forwards just can’t control them. I’m not sure who’s told him this is a good idea but I see it happen all the time.
 

Borys

Statistics Wizard
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
9,103
Location
Bielsko Biala, Poland
We would be better off if Pogba played the DM position. Both are shit at positioning and tackles but at least it isn't that easy to outmuscle him, and he'd win a few headers.

Playing Fred at DM is a disaster, no surprise he struggles as this role requires all the attributes he doesn't possess. I still think he's a decent all round supporting CM.
 

Ash_G

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2010
Messages
7,402
Fred has been terrible recently but it’s quite ridiculous that he is getting so much stick when the problem is due to the managers team selection. It’s been clear for some time that pogba isn’t good enough for us in a pivot. There is also the issue of the Ole being content with both our midfielders getting overrun.
Fred is our best progressive passer. Both him and matic are the only midfielders willing to pass through the middle. He is pivotal to us getting the ball forward very quick. Let’s lay off these silly threads.
I more or less agree. I think we could certainly upgrade on Fred but in reality the bigger issue is who plays alongside him as I think he offers more in most games than Matic/McT and as you say the issue is more the other midfielder. If it's McT/Matic alongside Fred, then Fred is our best CM which isn't great (but with our attack I think it's something we can work with) and if it's Pogba how he played against Wolves (albeit 2nd half was better from him and the team in general) we're leaving ourselves exposed as Pogba doesn't want to do the hard work that comes with playing there and we compound the situation by how high we push the attacking players to try and beat the offside trap.

I personally don't think there's any midfielder who on their own could cover as much ground as we were asking Fred to cover against Wolves, he certainly made mistakes but the biggest issue for me was the tactics. I don't think it's impossible to have Pogba there either in a lot of games but not if we're going to push the attack so high and therefore leave so much space in midfield.
 

Levenstein

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jan 19, 2018
Messages
200
Poor tactical choices for him in those last two games. Never played well with Pogba or Matic. I would like to see him with Van De Beek if McTominay is injured.

Will score a banger soon.
 

LoneStar

Full Member
Joined
Jun 25, 2017
Messages
3,558
He truly baffles me. Sometimes he can play great games against top opposition. But in other games, he can't seem to pass a ball 5m to his teammate. I do think it's harsh playing him as a sole DM along with Pogba (last game), but that doesn't excuse the passes (or rather misplaced passes) he was doing.
 

Real Madras

Full Member
Joined
Nov 30, 2016
Messages
1,068
Location
London
Supports
Real Oviedo
Daley Blind was class on the ball and completely comfortable sitting in front of the back four. He would have been perfect for this side.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,412
I’m not a fan, I think the minimum attributes needed for a United midfielder are being able to control the ball under press and pass forward, however he’s nowhere close to being the worst.

He isn’t helped by having Bruno play as a second striker at times, barely any teams play with number 10 that high, as well as two very attacking wide forwards. It’s the reason we can’t control a game, beat a press and have huge gaps defensively in midfield.

At times in the second half against Wolves he was covering at left back and you just look into midfield and there is a giant hole. Serious teams don’t allow that kind of space consistently.
 

Juansar_07

Full Member
Joined
Apr 5, 2014
Messages
407
Neither was Blind worse than Fred nor is Fred the worst regular player. Our memories for past years are often clouded by the more recent events. There were quite a few dreadful players in the past decade that precede him. You named one of them.

He was quite effective in some games last season and often performs better with McT around him. However, we need to do better than him. It was appalling with how that beast kept shoving him aside throughout the first half.