Understood. It is right that any soundings off from inside the camp are unwelcome, and that the club and fans tolerating them from some while not from others (when nobody is pulling up trees) is asking for trouble later on. However I've got no comments to make on how the club and the fans should ideally react to player dissent, I'm talking about the reality of the situation from the perspective of United fans. Pogba's conduct has caused hot debate, with points being made for and against on Pogba v Jose and his place in the team going forward, Shaw we have doubts over but we're largely happy with as our LB going forward and Martial is our best number nine. I wouldn't say any of them have had a completely free pass, not least Pogba who has been bagged online, in the media and at OT itself, but most fans can see their value if we are to avoid complete disaster on the pitch this year so what happened largely under Jose's tenure has been parked despite them struggling in our first team.
On the other hand we have why oh why comments from three blokes who were dropped from the same struggling team due to their own failings. Again I agree no dissenting remarks are good, putting up with some but not all can lead to difficulties and all the people we're discussing are multimillionaires who are essentially pissing in our faces but there is no mystery for me why Pogba, Martial and Shaw's situations are debated and to a certain degree tolerated while Lukaku, Sanchez and to a lesser extent Matic are laughed out of the building.