Is Solskjaer an attacking manager?

Aouer-United

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2019
Messages
270
5 games win in 22 games, two winners from a penalty goal

2-1 West Ham - Pogba two penalty goal. 1-0 Leicester City - Rashford goal

Chelsea game may be debate as we scored a penalty and didn't concede a goal but has scored 3 goals from open play.

This is damning stats, we should never rely on a penalty to win the game.

Ole claimed that we should have gotten the penalty against Arsenal because of handball and a penalty against AK. He's a delusion and tired of his excuses
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RAVred

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 7, 2016
Messages
598
He has no strategical style at the moment. He's someone whose still very new management, so defining him in a style doesnt really make sense.

Just like assigning him to rebuild manchester united when he hasnt even defined or developed his coaching philosophy
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
United clearly had issues in defence and Solskjaer has done something about it this summer. Not his fault that the Glazers did not give him more money for creative players that we also clearly need! Feck it took 4 months to negotiate deals for 3 players!

We have to look at what squad Solskjaer has right now, with only Pogba as the only creative player in midfield. How are we supposed to play a attacking fluent football? And with half of the few attacking players we have beeing injured also, what do people expect? miracles? Even Ferguson couldnt make this current team a PL winning team.

Atleast Solskajer does not park the bus like Mourinho did when we were leading 1-0.
Sorry but there are teams worse than United who still manage to play attacking football and have shots on goal.

We barely have any shots on goal, and you cannot blame the players ONLY for this. The manager has to in training coach them how to attack.

AZ Alkmar have players worse than United and looked like they were the only team looking to score a goal.

Our passing is as if we are playing a pre season friendly.
 

Mr Anderson

Eats, shoots, leaves
Joined
Jul 6, 2009
Messages
24,298
Location
Ireland
He talks about attacking and entertaining fans, but it seems he can’t implement it on the pitch. He is sadly a bit out of his depth - which you’d expect as even David Moyes has more managerial experience than Ole.

Ole isn’t the only inexperienced manager to take a big role, but other clubs had the framework and support from above to help out. Ole never stood a chance in the long term.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,420
Location
left wing
It's not really clear what he is trying to implement because he's failing so completely in doing it.
 

André Dominguez

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
6,374
Location
Lisbon
Supports
Benfica, Académica
We all know the squad is not a world beater, but we still have a top 5 squad. We should had been doing much better performance wise.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
Please give me any examples of us parking the bus at 0-0?

None of the games we played in premier league have we parked the bus that ive seen.
Not registering a single shot on target and time wasting against mighty AZ?
 

AlexUTD

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
3,929
Location
Norway, smashing the F5 button. LUHG
Sorry but there are teams worse than United who still manage to play attacking football and have shots on goal.

We barely have any shots on goal, and you cannot blame the players ONLY for this. The manager has to in training coach them how to attack.

AZ Alkmar have players worse than United and looked like they were the only team looking to score a goal.

Our passing is as if we are playing a pre season friendly.

We clearly need better players. Of course the manager and coaches have som blame too in this but blaming the manager solely for not playing good with a mediocre squad i feel is wrong. Why are not more poeple looking at the Glazers? they put us in this mess.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,160
Not registering a single shot on target and time wasting against mighty AZ?
Did Greenwood not have a shot saved?
Not to disagree with the overall sentiments, but surely that was a shot on target?!
 

AlexUTD

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2014
Messages
3,929
Location
Norway, smashing the F5 button. LUHG
Not registering a single shot on target and time wasting against mighty AZ?
Did you even see the game? Greenwood had a shot on the keeper, Rashford should have gotten a clear penalty and AZ was time wasting areound 70th minute. Only reason de Gea was times wasting the last minutes was because Lingard got injured and we were 10 men in the end.
 

devilish

Juventus fan who used to support United
Joined
Sep 5, 2002
Messages
61,683
I love his interviews though. They are so so positive. He reminds me of benigni in life is beautiful
 

Andersons Dietician

Full Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2016
Messages
13,235
If so, what's the evidence? His football is just as dull as Mourinho's.

When given money, his first instinct was to spend the bulk of it on two defenders. One of the two is a defensive FB - a position which in modern football is demands more attacking output than defensive nous.

So what makes you believe he is an attack minded manager?
I think it’s hard to be anything given how thin the squad is and how little general quality there is in it.

You also have to build attacks from a solid base to allow your players to go forward with less fear and at the start of the season that was there with Shaw and Bissaka pushed right up but given the limitations of our midfield I can see why fullback positions have been toned down a bit.

My main concern is in pre-season we pressed high and ferociously and there has been very little evidence of that sort of intensity which again I guess could be down to how light the squad is but if you knew you were going in to the season by gutting and clearing out what you didn’t want why train for a style which requires numbers and high energy. It also happens to increase the chance of injuries.

Personally I think he is an attacking manager but at the moment we really don’t have the squad or players to do anything other than what we are doing.
 

MisterLupus

New Member
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
505
Location
Bollocking about fluently.
I've learned not to listen to anything Ole says. He claimed Pogba and Rashford were 100% fit after the Arsenal game after Sky Sports brought it up as a potential explanation for their performances. A few days later we're told Pogba has been carrying a foot injury since the Southampton game.
Which report though? I've heard a lot of people repeating this but nobody seems to be able to produce a source. Press conferences are of course bullcrap always been that way but this sounds like bullcrap too. Also talking about injuries is one thing you don't want to disclose weaknesses in public - talking transfers towards the end of a season though? Why lie?
 

Garethw

scored 25-30 goals a season as a right footed RW
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
16,998
Location
England:
He has no strategical style at the moment. He's someone whose still very new management, so defining him in a style doesnt really make sense.

Just like assigning him to rebuild manchester united when he hasnt even defined or developed his coaching philosophy
He’s not new to management though. He’s been a manager for about ten years. He’s just not very good and should never have been given the job in the first place.
 

SteveCoppellFan

Full Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2014
Messages
863
Its easy to blame the manager and I suppose he has to take a lot of criticism in how we are playing.

At the end of the day he is responsible for our style of play and we are playing god awful football at times.

Saying that, the line ups im seeing lately has to be the worst ive seen in many a year and the squad is in a terrible state, Im really not sure any manager could be successful with this bunch.

How it has got to this? you will have to look upstairs for the ineptness, giving players new deals when they are so obviously well past their best and not replacing them with hungrier better players is beyond me.

Poor old Ole may have been in the wrong place and the wrong time, sure he gets to live the dream as United's manager but it may well turn out to be a nightmare job for him and a lot of the issues were not his making.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Schneckerl

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2016
Messages
2,704
I'd like to see what kind of attacking output is possible if you lost 2 out of 3 of your best goalscorers without replacement.
People here are focusing on the wrong problem.
 

Abhinav

Full Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2017
Messages
873
Sorry but there are teams worse than United who still manage to play attacking football and have shots on goal.

We barely have any shots on goal, and you cannot blame the players ONLY for this. The manager has to in training coach them how to attack.

AZ Alkmar have players worse than United and looked like they were the only team looking to score a goal.

Our passing is as if we are playing a pre season friendly.
It is easier to create chances when you setup to defend and then exploit the space through counter attacks. Trying to create openings in a congested space requires players to be at the top of their game, with consistency and creativity. Reason why we were able to do well in our run of wins last season was that teams were not afraid to play out against us and we were devastating on the counter.

Managers of smaller clubs will not be criticised if they setup the team to defend deep and play counter attacking football, you can’t do that with a club of Man United’s standing, as Jose found out.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
Did you even see the game? Greenwood had a shot on the keeper, Rashford should have gotten a clear penalty and AZ was time wasting areound 70th minute. Only reason de Gea was times wasting the last minutes was because Lingard got injured and we were 10 men in the end.
Which one? The one that was blocked in the first half before reaching the keeper?

AZ were more threatening and generally the “attacking” side of the two.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,648
Did Greenwood not have a shot saved?
Not to disagree with the overall sentiments, but surely that was a shot on target?!
I honestly can’t remember Greenwood having a shot on target. There was a shot blocked in the first half but that isn’t counted as one.
 

GBBQ

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2012
Messages
4,808
Location
Ireland
I'd like to see what kind of attacking output is possible if you lost 2 out of 3 of your best goalscorers without replacement.
People here are focusing on the wrong problem.
There can be more than one problem. The owners and CEO may need replacing but that doesn't excuse Ole's general lack of management skills. Consistently this season we are struggling against mid table sloggers who are far from setting the world alight. We look clueless and we have no plan B.

Also Ole's comments suggest he had the chance to sign strikers but didn't believe they were the right fit so it might not all be on the board if he chose to trust youth over a new striker.

Have you honestly seen anything in the way United have played since Ole signed the contract that would suggest a definite plan or approach? Seems to be a very vague counter attacking approach mixed with being clueless when we're in possession. For all their faults at least you knew the kind of football LVG and Mou were playing.
 

Nickelodeon

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
2,327
Atleast Solskajer does not park the bus like Mourinho did when we were leading 1-0.
The amount of times we have lost a 1-0 lead because we didn't follow through on our initial football points against that. Without going to much into the past, we have ceded 1-0 leads against Arsenal, Wolves, Southampton and Rochdale in this very season.

For some reason, the default response to going ahead is thinking that we wouldn't definitely score again in a proactive manner, so no matter which team it is, we go into a counter-attacking mode and hand the emphasis to our opponents. Don't think this is a much better approach than Mourinho's.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
It is easier to create chances when you setup to defend and then exploit the space through counter attacks. Trying to create openings in a congested space requires players to be at the top of their game, with consistency and creativity. Reason why we were able to do well in our run of wins last season was that teams were not afraid to play out against us and we were devastating on the counter.

Managers of smaller clubs will not be criticised if they setup the team to defend deep and play counter attacking football, you can’t do that with a club of Man United’s standing, as Jose found out.

Yeah I agree but Jose was his style and he does that wherever he goes. With Ole the problem is he keeps saying the Manutd way and when he used to play.

Utd played counter attack away from home but at home we used to dominate games, teams were scared of coming to Old Trafford. Right now fans are scared for Utd in EVERY game as to what will happen.
 

Schneckerl

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2016
Messages
2,704
There can be more than one problem. The owners and CEO may need replacing but that doesn't excuse Ole's general lack of management skills. Consistently this season we are struggling against mid table sloggers who are far from setting the world alight. We look clueless and we have no plan B.

Have you honestly seen anything in the way United have played since Ole signed the contract that would suggest a definite plan or approach? Seems to be a very vague counter attacking approach mixed with being clueless when we're in possession. For all their faults at least you knew the kind of football LVG and Mou were playing.
No, you're right - it doesn't look like Ole is the manager going forward. However, there are multiple threads focusing on Ole, while getting just a new manager will paper over the again.

Get a DoF - it's been way overdue for years - and strengthen the squad with at least 3 players (especially a striker).
Try to not get a caretaker manager or the next-best guy currently available.


Also Ole's comments suggest he had the chance to sign strikers but didn't believe they were the right fit so it might not all be on the board if he chose to trust youth over a new striker.
That might have been his biggest mistake if that was indeed his decision. Possible he wasn't backed, but couldn't say so publically.
 

Irrational.

Full Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2011
Messages
32,919
Location
LVG's notebook
Does Ole even have a style? I don't see anything. It's neither offensive nor defensive. Everything is off the cuff, aimless football. The players seem to have nonsense of direction or instruction from the 'coaching' staff. It seems to be the same message every game - 'go out there and have fun', which may have worked for the greatest man-manager of all time in Sir Alex, but Ole does not have anywhere near that personality.

Compare that with Pep, a manager that pays attention to the smallest minutiae of the game. Every player has strict instructions (with the exception of one or two), and if they aren't followed they're out of the team.

Ole should never have started this season as manager.
 

Josep Dowling

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
7,655
No fans have silly perspective about attacking football and what constitutes it's reputation. Even when we was on our winning run the team was not playing attacking football, we transitioned the ball from back to front quickly which provided opportunities to score. Never once under Ole have we looked dynamic in phases / patterns of play. There's never been any progressive movements from our attacking players to indicate any significance in instructions / coaching. We never string more than three passes together to score. You don't need 11 Ronaldo's to move the ball around the field that's why even if the glazers gave Ole 400 million the team would still be struggling. Ian Holloway's Blackpool had more attacking impetus than anything under Solskjaer in the league. Paul Pogba having a purple patch is what got Ole the job, there's no merit in his influence on the team whatsoever.
Absolutely. Everything was great when Pogba was played as a number 10 when Ole first took over. I am amazed we didn’t go for a DM in the summer to allow Pogba to play just behind the striker.

Our form dipped once Pogba moved back to the midfield two and he had less influence on our forward play. I am not blaming our terrible form just on Pogba, but he is the only player that can pass through the defence and actually takes a gamble on a forward ball rather than safe possession.

Last nights game was a perfect example on why we are so rubbish. Matic-Fred-Gomes.

Matic - passed sideways all game
Fred - can’t actually pass, he lost possession so many times
Gomes - too much expectation on a youth player to pull the strings
 

Alabaster Codify7

New Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
6,553
Location
Wales
No, he isn't. He's essentially very similar to Moyes, in that he's been honed in very traditional, old-fashioned coaching methods and values.

These type of tactics and methods will work just fine in the likes of the Norwegian league, where the talent level is relatively poor and he's not going up against top-class coaches or opposition players. But they will not shine in the better leagues in Europe.
 

Ziggy Starduster

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2019
Messages
136
I think Ole wants to be an attacking manager, but doesn't know how to implement it.
When he was at Cardiff, there is a clip of him shouting at players and telling them to shoot and have attempts at goal, but if your forwards aren't getting any service, then they can't shoot. Our attackers don't get the ball in anything like an attacking area on the whole.
It's not all on Ole though. What are the rest of the coaching staff doing? Why are we persisting with a formation that doesn't match or compliment our players?
We said similar under the last few manager though. Our players are poor.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,557
I think Ole wants to be an attacking manager, but doesn't know how to implement it.
When he was at Cardiff, there is a clip of him shouting at players and telling them to shoot and have attempts at goal, but if your forwards aren't getting any service, then they can't shoot. Our attackers don't get the ball in anything like an attacking area on the whole.
It's not all on Ole though. What are the rest of the coaching staff doing? Why are we persisting with a formation that doesn't match or compliment our players?
We said similar under the last few manager though. Our players are poor.
Our players might be poor but they are no way worse than AZ players, Rochdale, West Ham, Crystal Palace.

The main problem is our football is played at two speeds. Slow and stop.
 

Eckers99

Michael Corleone says hello
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
6,117
Ole is to management what Woodward is to chief executives. As if we've got both of them at the same club.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,943
Another way you can look at it is him v Lampard. We beat them 4-0 first game and slowly regressed. Lamps has got them playing better and winning with an attacking stylex which you can see. Ole is a shambles in comparison
 

padzilla

Hipster
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
3,393
Not to cruel but you could remove the word "attacking" from the thread title and it would still be a fair question.
 

hn4manunited

Full Member
Joined
Aug 23, 2016
Messages
931
Look, if Ole thinks the boards going to spent 300-400m for him, he's naively stupid. If ole thinks his strikeforce is adequate then he's naively stupid, if Ole thinks Lukaku/Sanchez are so bad he won't ever gonna need them ever in case of injury or form then he's naively stupid.

I've said before, coming in as a new manager (let alone interim manager) and acting Django selling the deadwoods are a sign of naive manager, especially if 3 mths onwards he's left with bare bone squad. Stupid from his part.

He has 10 months with the team, he should have known what Gomez, Chong, Greenwood are capable of. He should have had a clear vision of how he wants to play, which player he needs, how much budget he has, how to stretch the budget to try and plug every hole. He should have known Pogba's best position in 10 months, if he doesn't know he can ask him directly. Carrick/Mckenna has been with us for 4 years, what input do they have?

If blaming ed / jose / moyes makes us feel better and keeping that glimmer of hope (or delusion) alive, then we too deserve this situation.

Moyes should have taught us, if he walks talks coach like a midtable manager, chances are he is a midtable manager
this is spot on. Experienced managers won’t do that. Especially the players we moved on. Those were not even the ones we needed to get rid of first. The manager essentially have to be smart enough to avoid being in the situation that he’s put himself in.